Recommended Posts

Thanx For the reply

I'm now thinking about a hardware firewall then a corp or enterprise firewall but depending on price i might stick with symantec corp firewall 7 with vpn

http://enterprisesecurity.symantec.com/pro...fm?productid=47

585545407[/snapback]

Are you looking for something with better management features then what the typical free software will do? Are you even looking for specific features.

I don't think I as even aware Symantec made one outside the Norton one. I did know they made the appliances. I guess it only makes sense.

and no one seems to understand I Whant To Know What The Best Corp Or Enterprise firewall ;)

585541905[/snapback]

If you want a corporate/enterprise FW I'd suggest Checkpoint FW-1/VPN-1.

Be prepared to pay for it though, ain't cheap. ( http://www.checkpoint.com )

As a platform for that you might want to consider Nokia IPSO. Naturally, they're not free either. ( http://www.nokia.com/nokia/0,8764,43122,00.html )

edit: edited some text and links added

Zonealarm is GREAT until it STOPS my internet!

destroys download speeds, stops sites loading correctly, all settings configured correctly...

Damn it, i need a different one, i feel gutted for getting the pro version of zonealarm now!

Can we have a poll on this please?

Are you looking for something with better management features then what the typical free software will do? Are you even looking for specific features.

I don't think I as even aware Symantec made one outside the Norton one. I did know they made the appliances. I guess it only makes sense.

585552207[/snapback]

nope just a good hardware and software firewall the best corp or enterprise security u have tryed thats all i whant to know

the best firewal is a hardware firewall.

but what i reccomend is you download software ones and then take the ShieldsUp test.

my u.s.robotics router aced every test, complete stealth mode

585538536[/snapback]

How do you take ShiledsUp test when you have a router? I have one too (dsl nat router) but tests from grc reaches my external ISP ip address only, not my local pc ports. Do you use any 3rd party firewall?

XP SP2 firewall and safe computing here :book:

I use a Watchguard firewall appliance between my network and cable modem and Zone Alarm Pro on my primary desktop to control software that might want an outbound connection. Zone Alarm Pro is good to control machine to machine access behind your point of contact with the internet. I think its good to have a multi-tier approach to protection. THe hardware appliance protects and routes IP packets coming in and software firewalls protect machines within the organization. Zone Alarm detects what is appropriate network traffic and what's not and will ask if there is some uncertainty.

If your looking for a good and fast way to protect your entire network, a hardware solution is the definte way to go, whether its an appliance or a server running ISA or the like. Just my $.02

I'd have to suggest IPCop. It's a spin off of the SmoothWall project, whose main developer has become more interested in advancing and promoting his commercial version. IPCop is all open source, and if you've got a spare PC to run it on, you can grab it from http://ipcop.sourceforge.net/

IPcop looks pretty nice. I'm going to try it over astaro I think. Been using astaro for a while now and it is great.

From what I can tell IPcop has Web caching also. I can't find if it has DNS caching which I also like to have. Also wondering if it has an easy update retrieval setup.

With the addons it looks like anythings possible. The Dan's content filter looks like a good feature for family networks. Looks like you can also addon nessus. :shifty:

I'd bet there are SPAM and virus filters out somewhere also. Wonder if it supports SMP?

i use outpost firewall.. very simple to configure.. none of that in your face balloon pop-ups.. lots of features and you can also download plug-ins for it..

for mine i have the "blockpost" plug in.. basically peerguardian, except without the system resource hogging.

Ok, first up, the reason most people don't read posts is that - what is the best firewall/av - comes up very regulary and ppl just love to debate - or just declare what firewall they use.

Personally I admin a network, but the fw is out of my control. I run a client side personal firewall - za pro, although I am considering za sec suite. I know it has a large footprint - but its the best pfw out there in terms of dumb user configuration.

For a corporate firewall - are you talking about a firewall guarding your network - in which case a hardware firewall, or dedicated linux box running a software firewall. Nearly the same thing really.

Or are you talking about an enterprise wide solution to providing client software on all your machines. If so, then you will need to pay for it. In some cases, this is where symantec and other corporations gain ground. the name is well trusted, and they provide corporate support, unlike many other providers.

  • 1 year later...

Hi there,

I will add another useful resources about personal firewall.

********************

http://www.r-firewall.com/

(freeware)

http://www.agnitum.com/products/outpostfree/index.php

(free version)

http://www.all-internet-security.com/top_1...l_software.html

(detailed review)

**********************

As for me, i use Zone Alarm Pro. One of the best on the market in term of price.

Panda Antivirus 2007 - Terrible Customer Service

When I tried to get some customer support I keep getting emails from Panda that make no sense at all.

I hope this helps.

Jennifer

I've been using Zone alarm pro for quite some time now and found it to be excellent. It warns you when any program is trying to do anything shady, giving you complete protection. That coupled with my hardware firewall, arovax shield and win patrol. With those I don't think anything can really happen to my computer. But I'm a noob so whatever =D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!