Recommended Posts

Thanx For the reply

I'm now thinking about a hardware firewall then a corp or enterprise firewall but depending on price i might stick with symantec corp firewall 7 with vpn

http://enterprisesecurity.symantec.com/pro...fm?productid=47

585545407[/snapback]

Are you looking for something with better management features then what the typical free software will do? Are you even looking for specific features.

I don't think I as even aware Symantec made one outside the Norton one. I did know they made the appliances. I guess it only makes sense.

and no one seems to understand I Whant To Know What The Best Corp Or Enterprise firewall ;)

585541905[/snapback]

If you want a corporate/enterprise FW I'd suggest Checkpoint FW-1/VPN-1.

Be prepared to pay for it though, ain't cheap. ( http://www.checkpoint.com )

As a platform for that you might want to consider Nokia IPSO. Naturally, they're not free either. ( http://www.nokia.com/nokia/0,8764,43122,00.html )

edit: edited some text and links added

Zonealarm is GREAT until it STOPS my internet!

destroys download speeds, stops sites loading correctly, all settings configured correctly...

Damn it, i need a different one, i feel gutted for getting the pro version of zonealarm now!

Can we have a poll on this please?

Are you looking for something with better management features then what the typical free software will do? Are you even looking for specific features.

I don't think I as even aware Symantec made one outside the Norton one. I did know they made the appliances. I guess it only makes sense.

585552207[/snapback]

nope just a good hardware and software firewall the best corp or enterprise security u have tryed thats all i whant to know

the best firewal is a hardware firewall.

but what i reccomend is you download software ones and then take the ShieldsUp test.

my u.s.robotics router aced every test, complete stealth mode

585538536[/snapback]

How do you take ShiledsUp test when you have a router? I have one too (dsl nat router) but tests from grc reaches my external ISP ip address only, not my local pc ports. Do you use any 3rd party firewall?

XP SP2 firewall and safe computing here :book:

I use a Watchguard firewall appliance between my network and cable modem and Zone Alarm Pro on my primary desktop to control software that might want an outbound connection. Zone Alarm Pro is good to control machine to machine access behind your point of contact with the internet. I think its good to have a multi-tier approach to protection. THe hardware appliance protects and routes IP packets coming in and software firewalls protect machines within the organization. Zone Alarm detects what is appropriate network traffic and what's not and will ask if there is some uncertainty.

If your looking for a good and fast way to protect your entire network, a hardware solution is the definte way to go, whether its an appliance or a server running ISA or the like. Just my $.02

I'd have to suggest IPCop. It's a spin off of the SmoothWall project, whose main developer has become more interested in advancing and promoting his commercial version. IPCop is all open source, and if you've got a spare PC to run it on, you can grab it from http://ipcop.sourceforge.net/

IPcop looks pretty nice. I'm going to try it over astaro I think. Been using astaro for a while now and it is great.

From what I can tell IPcop has Web caching also. I can't find if it has DNS caching which I also like to have. Also wondering if it has an easy update retrieval setup.

With the addons it looks like anythings possible. The Dan's content filter looks like a good feature for family networks. Looks like you can also addon nessus. :shifty:

I'd bet there are SPAM and virus filters out somewhere also. Wonder if it supports SMP?

i use outpost firewall.. very simple to configure.. none of that in your face balloon pop-ups.. lots of features and you can also download plug-ins for it..

for mine i have the "blockpost" plug in.. basically peerguardian, except without the system resource hogging.

Ok, first up, the reason most people don't read posts is that - what is the best firewall/av - comes up very regulary and ppl just love to debate - or just declare what firewall they use.

Personally I admin a network, but the fw is out of my control. I run a client side personal firewall - za pro, although I am considering za sec suite. I know it has a large footprint - but its the best pfw out there in terms of dumb user configuration.

For a corporate firewall - are you talking about a firewall guarding your network - in which case a hardware firewall, or dedicated linux box running a software firewall. Nearly the same thing really.

Or are you talking about an enterprise wide solution to providing client software on all your machines. If so, then you will need to pay for it. In some cases, this is where symantec and other corporations gain ground. the name is well trusted, and they provide corporate support, unlike many other providers.

  • 1 year later...

Hi there,

I will add another useful resources about personal firewall.

********************

http://www.r-firewall.com/

(freeware)

http://www.agnitum.com/products/outpostfree/index.php

(free version)

http://www.all-internet-security.com/top_1...l_software.html

(detailed review)

**********************

As for me, i use Zone Alarm Pro. One of the best on the market in term of price.

Panda Antivirus 2007 - Terrible Customer Service

When I tried to get some customer support I keep getting emails from Panda that make no sense at all.

I hope this helps.

Jennifer

I've been using Zone alarm pro for quite some time now and found it to be excellent. It warns you when any program is trying to do anything shady, giving you complete protection. That coupled with my hardware firewall, arovax shield and win patrol. With those I don't think anything can really happen to my computer. But I'm a noob so whatever =D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!