Windows XP Worth it? Or Windows 2000


Recommended Posts

I love Windows XP Pro, esp. if you got a free legal copy and bought another won under academic license. Although 2000 ran better on my laptop, faster, and less heat up than XP. Ehh, who cares, I'm still using XP.

Although I doubt I'll be able to run longhorn or blackcomb on my current system.

I say go with 2000. I had many many problems with XP on my system (constant BSOD's) and when i formatted and threw 2k on all my problems went away. No doubt XP is a good OS but it has a LONG LONG way to go before it will be as good as win 2k. And OSMAN people have been pirating windows for years and trust me it won't kill microsoft. Nothing will.

I switched back to win2000 after having XP for a while. I felt like I needed a system thats been out for a while, has bugs etc worked out, (service packs) is the king of stability and does what I want it to do without all the bloat-ness. (no thats not a word) So Im happy running my win2k again

  • 2 weeks later...

Everyone here is crazy.

XP is too bloated to be any good. I have ran it for 3-4 months now and have had to re-format about every month, because of hardware mishaps. Software problems and XP just fcking up again.

I am going back to 2kwithSP3, I love themes but I want a stable system.

Originally posted by 3dfx

Windows XP is great, but with a 3dfx card it sucks, well, finally im gonna get an nVidia card on monday... w00t :devious:

If your still using 3dfx then win 3.1 is the best for you

but as to the post winxp i find is just fine and runs stable as hell

(working on a uptime of 1 month now)

Ive been using xp for a few months now but it does crash more often then i would like it to. Also the 1.5gigs it takes up is too much for mah 8gig harddrive.

im thinking of using win2000 instead wif its stability and all. but will 2000 cut it for games. i know they say its not designed for games but ive heard ppl say it works just fine for games.

So does win2000 run games up to XPs standard at least as in like compatibility and stuff? With the sp2 that is.

thanks

I find with XP's new improvements to the user interface, like the buttons that expand from the taskbar, and the new start menu, I can work much faster than I could with windows 2000.

Plus, if u have a decent PC, you wont notice the slight speed difference with 2000.

And actually, since I got my Athlon XP and GeForce 4400 card, my PC has not crashed once, nor had any of those graphics loops than NVIDIA Cards often have :)

Im a happy bunny :) XP rules!

I found Windows 2000 to be great before xp came out - way better than 98 / ME.

However, for me 2000 had issues with my mouse and so the pointer was going insane.

XP Pro is much better for me - only crashed a few times. XP has a lot of great new features - which means there's more to go wrong - but that seems fair enough :-)

Basically if you can't afford xp don't upgrade - esp since you can get skining prog's to make it look more like xp if you want a shiny shiny OS......

.o(WHY is it that people with XP want to msstyles to change the look - and people with pre-xp windows want theirs to look like the default Luna theme :ditsy: ?

if you can afford it tho make sure you have some decent amount of RAM esp 256mb+ (wish i had 512mb :evil: )

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • In the boot options in the UEFI is set to legacy or CMS? It needs to be set to UEFI if it's not already.
    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      466
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!