Signature Reminder

[Chad]

:crazy: Graaa! Chad did you edit mine? Some mod did and they did not do it the right way! :laugh: they only took half the code off :rofl: Oh well when I made that post it had been too big but I had shrank it, I am pretty sure it was not oversized anymore.....oh well  :ninja:

585904613[/snapback]

Yes. It was larger than the guidelines.

[username]

check on the size too, i hate it when somebody has a 300K sig on some slow server

[pre]

I just got a warning but my signature isnt even over the limit...

See Preview...

:crazy:

Your warning level has been raised. I removed you sig file as it violated the rules. If you insist on placing it back again, you will be profile restricted and unable to edit your signatures at all. Please abide by the rules.

Armeck

Super Mod

[Chode]

Did you remember that text counts towards your total signature size?

[Gowcra]

I know I'm fine. No worries on my end.

[Joel]

I just got a warning but my signature isnt even over the limit...

See Preview...

  :crazy:

Your warning level has been raised. I removed you sig file as it violated the rules. If you insist on placing it back again, you will be profile restricted and unable to edit your signatures at all. Please abide by the rules.

Armeck

Super Mod

585971880[/snapback]

I bet that yellow image put you over the KB limit for sigs. It's 50KB total.

[+unabatedshagie Subscriber¹]

it might be because it's a dynamic sig?

[Joel]

No, it was the yellow animated 200KB+ image.

[Aaron Veteran]

I just got a warning but my signature isnt even over the limit...

See Preview...

  :crazy:

Your warning level has been raised. I removed you sig file as it violated the rules. If you insist on placing it back again, you will be profile restricted and unable to edit your signatures at all. Please abide by the rules.

Armeck

Super Mod

585971880[/snapback]

[Danellis]

Is my avatar OK? At the time of adding it I was told it was fine... Just hoping it still is :).

[Joel]

Is my avatar OK? At the time of adding it I was told it was fine... Just hoping it still is :).

585973563[/snapback]

(Y)

[IceDogg]

Not complaining, but I thought the rules said no flashing avatars or sigs.

If the avatar/signature is overly distracting, ie. bright flashing colors, animated sigs (i.e. GIF's/Flash)

I see a lot of these, so maybe that part of the rule has changed..if so, maybe it should be edited to reflect such change. I mean NO disrespect to any mods/admins or Neowin users. Just trying to clarify this.

[Chad]

There's nothing wrong with flashing avatars or sigs, as long as they aren't overly distracting. If you see something that is pretty bad, just report it.

[IceDogg]

Again, no disrespect meant here. but I think

is "bright flashing colors" if it isn't what is? Please danellis, don't take this personal.. it's nothing against you. I'm just trying to find where the line is. Granted I know you can disable all avatars and sigs, but I like seeing most of them. And it says, in that part that I quoted from the rules, "animated sigs", that's pretty cut and dry. Yet I see a lot that have moving text..and images in them, isn't that what animated means? Moving? I don't want to sit here and point them out. I only used danellis because Joel said it was (Y) . And I'm not questioning the Mods or Admins, just trying to make sure I understand what's allowed and what's not. :ninja:

[Danellis]

Again, no disrespect meant here. but I think

is "bright flashing colors" if it isn't what is? Please danellis, don't take this personal.. it's nothing against you. I'm just trying to find where the line is. Granted I know you can disable all avatars and sigs, but I like seeing most of them. And it says, in that part that I quoted from the rules, "animated sigs", that's pretty cut and dry. Yet I see a lot that have moving text..and images in them, isn't that what animated means? Moving? I don't want to sit here and point them out. I only used danellis because Joel said it was  (Y) . And I'm not questioning the Mods or Admins, just trying to make sure I understand what's allowed and what's not.  :ninja:

585976208[/snapback]

lol don't worry about it I have a whole fanclub for my avatar :D. I personally don't see anything wrong with it because it's not overly distracting. If it is getting on too many peoples nerves though I'll remove it :p.

[Joel]

Again, no disrespect meant here. but I think

is "bright flashing colors" if it isn't what is?

585976208[/snapback]

Think seizure-inducing Google ads. That's the idea.

[Danellis]

[offtopic]

You should have awards for the most annoying/interesting avatars and sigs. You can have nominees and then a poll on who the winner is :laugh:.

[/offtopic]

[Gelob]

[offtopic]

You should have awards for the most annoying/interesting avatars and sigs.  You can have nominees and then a poll on who the winner is  :laugh:.

[/offtopic]

585977244[/snapback]

That is what the monthly avatar and signature threads are for. Although i agree we should have a contest. Doesnt have to be a prize but just you get your avie and sig shown off :)

[Danellis]

That is what the monthly avatar and signature threads are for. Although i agree we should have a contest. Doesnt have to be a prize but just you get your avie and sig shown off :)

585977270[/snapback]

yep well the monthly avatar and signature threads are really to show off your avatar and signature. I wouldn't mind not having a prize but it would be a good laugh :rofl:.

[IceDogg]

Think seizure-inducing Google ads. That's the idea.

585976944[/snapback]

LOL ok.. thanks for clearing that up. :D

Edit:

I personally don't see anything wrong with it because it's not overly distracting. If it is getting on too many peoples nerves though I'll remove it

No, it doesn't bother me at all. Personally if one bothers me, I just block it. :D so don't worry about it. Guess I'm just playing devils advocate here.

[Fred Derf Veteran]

My opinion would be that danellis' AVATAR would be about the flashiest that would still be permitted.

Ediit: :whistle:

Edited May 28, 2005 by fred666

[Danellis]

^you mean avatar? :p

[Matt]

hows my sig? :innocent: ive reported a couple of members with sigs nearly 3 times the maximum size. it was ginormous.

[Steven]

Think seizure-inducing Google ads. That's the idea.

585976944[/snapback]

and annoying Jackpot Casino Music... ugh. :argh:

No Way! :p

[Hypoxiaicon]

So, Chad, since you removed my signature image as including text + image it was over 170 Pixels.

When will you be removing Stevens image?

At present his (Including image and text) is 196 Pixels high, exceeding the 170 pixels allowed. Picky? nah, you did it with me :/

Steven, this is not a dig at you at all, more of a Question to the staff as to why MINE was removed without notification, yet others are staying. If you can edit my signature then a PM is only 1 click and a few words away, come on, its not that hard. :rolleyes:

Edited May 28, 2005 by Hypoxiaicon