Recommended Posts

:crazy: Graaa! Chad did you edit mine? Some mod did and they did not do it the right way! :laugh: they only took half the code off :rofl: Oh well when I made that post it had been too big but I had shrank it, I am pretty sure it was not oversized anymore.....oh well  :ninja:

585904613[/snapback]

Yes. It was larger than the guidelines.

  • 2 weeks later...

I just got a warning but my signature isnt even over the limit...

See Preview...

back8mb.gif :crazy:

Your warning level has been raised. I removed you sig file as it violated the rules. If you insist on placing it back again, you will be profile restricted and unable to edit your signatures at all. Please abide by the rules.

Armeck

Super Mod

I just got a warning but my signature isnt even over the limit...

See Preview...

back8mb.gif  :crazy:

Your warning level has been raised. I removed you sig file as it violated the rules. If you insist on placing it back again, you will be profile restricted and unable to edit your signatures at all. Please abide by the rules.

Armeck

Super Mod

585971880[/snapback]

I bet that yellow image put you over the KB limit for sigs. It's 50KB total.

I just got a warning but my signature isnt even over the limit...

See Preview...

back8mb.gif  :crazy:

Your warning level has been raised. I removed you sig file as it violated the rules. If you insist on placing it back again, you will be profile restricted and unable to edit your signatures at all. Please abide by the rules.

Armeck

Super Mod

585971880[/snapback]

post-22586-1117112570.gif

Not complaining, but I thought the rules said no flashing avatars or sigs.

If the avatar/signature is overly distracting, ie. bright flashing colors, animated sigs (i.e. GIF's/Flash)

I see a lot of these, so maybe that part of the rule has changed..if so, maybe it should be edited to reflect such change. I mean NO disrespect to any mods/admins or Neowin users. Just trying to clarify this.

Again, no disrespect meant here. but I think

av-57577.gif

is "bright flashing colors" if it isn't what is? Please danellis, don't take this personal.. it's nothing against you. I'm just trying to find where the line is. Granted I know you can disable all avatars and sigs, but I like seeing most of them. And it says, in that part that I quoted from the rules, "animated sigs", that's pretty cut and dry. Yet I see a lot that have moving text..and images in them, isn't that what animated means? Moving? I don't want to sit here and point them out. I only used danellis because Joel said it was (Y) . And I'm not questioning the Mods or Admins, just trying to make sure I understand what's allowed and what's not. :ninja:

Again, no disrespect meant here. but I think

av-57577.gif

is "bright flashing colors" if it isn't what is? Please danellis, don't take this personal.. it's nothing against you. I'm just trying to find where the line is. Granted I know you can disable all avatars and sigs, but I like seeing most of them. And it says, in that part that I quoted from the rules, "animated sigs", that's pretty cut and dry. Yet I see a lot that have moving text..and images in them, isn't that what animated means? Moving? I don't want to sit here and point them out. I only used danellis because Joel said it was  (Y) . And I'm not questioning the Mods or Admins, just trying to make sure I understand what's allowed and what's not.  :ninja:

585976208[/snapback]

lol don't worry about it I have a whole fanclub for my avatar :D. I personally don't see anything wrong with it because it's not overly distracting. If it is getting on too many peoples nerves though I'll remove it :p.

[offtopic]

You should have awards for the most annoying/interesting avatars and sigs.  You can have nominees and then a poll on who the winner is  :laugh:.

[/offtopic]

585977244[/snapback]

That is what the monthly avatar and signature threads are for. Although i agree we should have a contest. Doesnt have to be a prize but just you get your avie and sig shown off :)

That is what the monthly avatar and signature threads are for. Although i agree we should have a contest. Doesnt have to be a prize but just you get your avie and sig shown off :)

585977270[/snapback]

yep well the monthly avatar and signature threads are really to show off your avatar and signature. I wouldn't mind not having a prize but it would be a good laugh :rofl:.

Think seizure-inducing Google ads. That's the idea.

585976944[/snapback]

LOL ok.. thanks for clearing that up. :D

Edit:

I personally don't see anything wrong with it because it's not overly distracting. If it is getting on too many peoples nerves though I'll remove it

No, it doesn't bother me at all. Personally if one bothers me, I just block it. :D so don't worry about it. Guess I'm just playing devils advocate here.

So, Chad, since you removed my signature image as including text + image it was over 170 Pixels.

When will you be removing Stevens image?

At present his (Including image and text) is 196 Pixels high, exceeding the 170 pixels allowed. Picky? nah, you did it with me :/

Steven, this is not a dig at you at all, more of a Question to the staff as to why MINE was removed without notification, yet others are staying. If you can edit my signature then a PM is only 1 click and a few words away, come on, its not that hard. :rolleyes:

Edited by Hypoxiaicon
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!