Recommended Posts

Even mine's too big with one line of text, and has been for months.

/goes to get rid of the text/

The ironic thing is that if I reply with only one line of text, the minimum height of the space on the left here, is bigger than the signature would have taken up.

But meh, I rarely post one line replies.

is my signature and avatar ok because my signature looks bigger than anyone elses  :blush:

585990020[/snapback]

Width: 530 pixels (maximum allowed 550 pixels) - okay

Height: 160 pixels (maximum allowed 170 pixels) - okay

filesize: 82.63 KB (maximum allowed 50KB) - NOT okay

If you can edit my signature then a PM is only 1 click and a few words away, come on, its not that hard.  :rolleyes:

585983829[/snapback]

If you can view the rules, then editing your sig is only one click away. Come on, it's not that hard to read and comprehend.

I refuse to send a pm to people who blatantly break such an easy rule to follow.

If you can view the rules, then editing your sig is only one click away.  Come on, it's not that hard to read and comprehend.

I refuse to send a pm to people who blatantly break such an easy rule to follow.

585991167[/snapback]

I was not aware that people where been so picky regarding a few extra pixels over the limit. It has been like that for over a year.

It was hardly a mass of ugly bright colours, nor over the allowed file size limit.

Oh, I SEE STEVENS is still not been edited.

Your excuse?

YOU, are not enforcing signature guidline rules, as YOU are only editing certain peoples signatures. If YOU was enforcing the signature guidline rules then ALL sigs over this recently 'Big Deal over a few pixels' thing started up would of been removed.

I was not aware that people where been so picky regarding a few extra pixels over the limit. It has been like that for over a year.

It was hardly a mass of ugly bright colours, nor over the allowed file size limit.

Oh, I SEE STEVENS is still not been edited.

Your excuse?

YOU, are not enforcing signature guidline rules, as YOU are only editing certain peoples signatures. If YOU was enforcing the signature guidline rules then ALL sigs over this recently 'Big Deal over a few pixels' thing started up would of been removed.

585997319[/snapback]

Bottom line is that your signature was noticed and edited. That's all. Calm down. Don't make this to be something it's not.

Why did you change your signature to a mass blob of colors?

585997400[/snapback]

Excuse me? Mass blob of colours?

Ive just got Adobe Photoshop CS2 and went through some Tutorials about this effect.

I can do them in about 35 seconds from scratch now. I'm pretty good at it now, I find your comment a little harsh considering I spent time on it. Just because you can't see it for whats it worth does not mean others can not.

Excuse me? Mass blob of colours?

Ive just got Adobe Photoshop CS2 and went through some Tutorials about this effect.

I can do them in about 35 seconds from scratch now. I'm pretty good at it now, I find your comment a little harsh considering I spent time on it. Just because you can't see it for whats it worth does not mean others can not.

585997421[/snapback]

That sig is Crazy! I Love it! :)

OMG!...

I have re-saw this topic and wanted to be SURE that my sig was again in law...

but danm... I have summited my PNG format of my sig

It was ~120K :|

I have reported some ad-sig and warned some ppl that thier sigs was oversized but mine was oversized in matter of file size... :cry: I was outlaws...

Now I hope it dosn't hurt to mush dial-up users...

Use 30469 bytes now :innocent:

Excuse me? Mass blob of colours?

Ive just got Adobe Photoshop CS2 and went through some Tutorials about this effect.

I can do them in about 35 seconds from scratch now. I'm pretty good at it now, I find your comment a little harsh considering I spent time on it. Just because you can't see it for whats it worth does not mean others can not.

585997421[/snapback]

I apologize but that sig is just to big, you're a cool guy and all but be careful you've been warned numorous times someone might ban you, I hate to see that happen to a person like you.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMAZON needs to take total accountability for this.
    • Server Summit had a heap of announcements, ADCS changes are baller.
    • Nice, hope they *finally* fixed the issue with the NTFS driver where the system would completely brick during large file copies using the built in driver. It's been broken for years requiring me to use the older, slower, NTFS-3G FUSE driver.
    • Windows 11 KB5094126 BSODing, freezing, forcing BitLocker lockout, breaks OneDrive, and more by Sayan Sen Microsoft released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 last week as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. While Microsoft has so far not acknowledged any major problems with the release, some users online are running into problems. These range from OneDrive and Dropbox access issues, BitLocker recovery lockouts, to blue screens and BSODs. The most common one seems to be happening with HP systems wherein affected users say they hit 0xc0430001 BSOD (blue screen of death) error code after the KB5094126 update. We wonder if this could be related to the recent bug we covered on HP devices wherein the ongoing Secure Boot certificate updates are leading to similar issues. While we are not certain, users affected by this issue likely need to ensure that the boot.stl file is included on the installation media (such as a USB installer or ISO), if the above-mentioned dynamic updates are deployed. If this file is missing, computers may fail to boot from the installation media and could display the error 0xc0430001. This STL file is used by Secure Boot to verify that the boot files are trusted, so it must match the same Windows version and system architecture. To ensure the file is included, Microsoft recommends using the Update WinPE script, which automatically updates the image and handles the required files. Alternatively, you can manually copy the boot.stl file from the Windows\Boot\EFI folder on a Windows device and place it in the matching folder on your installation media before deploying the updated image. Aside from blue screening some users also note their systems have been freezing following the update. This could be happening to Lenovo PCs specifically. In the case of the OneDrive and Dropbox access issues, a user figured out that there could be a conflict with UAC. He explained: "Okay, so I did some digging, and in our environment KB5094126 breaks OneDrive and Dropbox in Explorer. I went through all our GPOs and found out that the combination of disabling UAC and having my user being a local admin breaks OneDrive in Explorer. ... If I enable UAC again, then it works, even with KB5094126 still installed." Hopefully, Microsoft will look into these issues. Source: Microsoft forum (link1, link2, link3, link4), Reddit (link1, link2, link3, link4)
    • It is when it's a desktop in my house though for a PC that's lightly used and not really important when it is. If it was a laptop, it would be a different story. The real solution is varied and begins starting at post #22 in that thread.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      197
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!