Recommended Posts

being spiteful gets you no where, but so be it.

585997631[/snapback]

Thanks for the sig Bang you rock. Yankees in 05! hell 06 and 07 for that matter also!

as for the topic. whats the big deal? sigs are a way of people expressing themself. Now I wouldnt put an annoying sig up but everyone has dif tastes.

Let's settle down now. The sig guidelines are there for YOUR benefit. No one wants a massively gaudy sig distracting from the content of the site. Don't like it? I have some forums for you where you can pretty much put up whatever size sig you want. Go post there.

Just as clear as the sig rules are, the appropriate action for reporting someone is to use the reporting system. Why is this so hard to understand?

Excuse me? Mass blob of colours?

Ive just got Adobe Photoshop CS2 and went through some Tutorials about this effect.

I can do them in about 35 seconds from scratch now. I'm pretty good at it now, I find your comment a little harsh considering I spent time on it. Just because you can't see it for whats it worth does not mean others can not.

585997421[/snapback]

I think we can all see what it is.

Isn't there a way to limit the size of sigs? like some sort of fixed cell that the sig go's in, so that it will look cropped if it's to long or wide. Also limit the file size like you do when we try to post pics in a thread.

Then most of these problems will be solved.

Isn't there a way to limit the size of sigs? like some sort of fixed cell that the sig go's in, so that it will look cropped if it's to long or wide. Also limit the file size like you do when we try to post pics in a thread.

Then most of these problems will be solved.

585998885[/snapback]

Width: 380 pixels (okay)

Height: 120 pixels (okay)

Filesize: 70KB (NOT okay)

I apologize but that sig is just to big, you're a cool guy and all but be careful you've been warned numorous times someone might ban you, I hate to see that happen to a person like you.

585997696[/snapback]

I don't care if i'm banned. I've just about had it with this place these days with the half-ass Moderation. Im sure you guys in real life are great guys, but on the forum... your actions and comments leave a lot to desired.. The last year - 6 months tis site in my opinion it has gone down hill. Plenty of other places to post :)

bunch of freaken tattle tales on this board I swear.

I had to take out my subscriber badge cuz someone around here complained about MY TEXT SIG WAS TOO BIG!?

GEEZ :argh:

585997730[/snapback]

LoL. Thats the 'Rules' for you Steven, sad Eh?

I think we can all see what it is.

585998550[/snapback]

Jolly Good! :laugh:

Whats funny is this:-

You can TURN OFF signatures, smiles and the rest of it. You WOULD do that if you was 56k and also use the lo-fi site, No?

Edited by Hypoxiaicon
I don't care if i'm banned. I've just about had it with this place these days with the half-ass Moderation. Im sure you guys in real life are great guys, but on the forum... your actions and comments leave a lot to desired.. The last year - 6 months tis site in my opinion it has gone down hill. Plenty of other places to post :)

LoL. Thats the 'Rules' for you Steven, sad Eh?

Jolly Good!  :laugh:

Whats funny is this:-

You can TURN OFF signatures, smiles and the rest of it. You WOULD do that if you was 56k and also use the lo-fi site, No?

585999272[/snapback]

I don't understand why you insist on barking about how crappy the moderating is, when in the same breath, you call out someone else on their sig being too large.

Bit hypocritical yourself? I realize the point you are trying to make, but you did it completely wrong. Chad noticed your sig. Not Steven's. Eventually, Steven's would have been noticed.

What drives me nuts is that some members think staff has nothing better to do with their time than 'pick on' certain members. Trust me. I'd like nothing better than not having to deal with members breaking the rules...it would certainly make our lives easier.

Bit hypocritical yourself? 

585999856[/snapback]

Hmmm, If thats making a fuss as to why mine was removed and his wasnt in the same thread where he posted, then yes.

Would you question something and make a fuss if something happened to you, yet the person next to you went un-noticed?

Oh, the drama. It's a signature kids. :argh:

Can't we all just get along? :hug_guy: :hug_girl:

I've gone through everybody's signature that had 4-odd thousand posts and up and they are all now in complaince. Nobody is getting special treatment. Well, except the people with less than 4500 posts because I lost patience in the whole process by about that point.

Hmmm, If thats making a fuss as to why mine was removed and his wasnt in the same thread where he posted, then yes.

Would you question something and make a fuss if something happened to you, yet the person next to you went un-noticed?

585999868[/snapback]

His was removed as well.

Would I question it? Not if I was in the wrong. Would I make a fuss that someone else didn't get the same treatment? Not publically and make a spectacle of myself. The report post does a wonderful job of doing this without derailing a thread.

His was removed as well.

Would I question it?  Not if I was in the wrong.  Would I make a fuss that someone else didn't get the same treatment?  Not publically and make a spectacle of myself.  The report post does a wonderful job of doing this without derailing a thread.

585999898[/snapback]

But I wasnt aware I was breaking the rules and thus in the wrong. Ive read the Signature guidlines, but it was recently changed.

When I checked it last, it just had that blue box saying 'Is your sig bigger then.....' etc.

I thought, aslong as your IMAGE was not bigger then that there would be no problem.

But as above, it was changed and now INCLUDES text.

So yes, I have no problem admitting I was wrong and breaking the rules about my signature, But, I did not know that, hence a PM would of been nice.

But I wasnt aware I was breaking the rules and thus in the wrong. Ive read the Signature guidlines, but it was recently changed.

When I checked it last, it just had that blue box saying 'Is your sig bigger then.....' etc.

I thought, aslong as your IMAGE was not bigger then that there would be no problem.

But as above, it was changed and now INCLUDES text.

So yes, I have no problem admitting I was wrong and breaking the rules about my signature, But, I did not know that, hence a PM would of been nice.

585999971[/snapback]

Sorry, you are wrong on that account. That text you are referring to has been there for a long time now.

But I wasnt aware I was breaking the rules and thus in the wrong. Ive read the Signature guidlines, but it was recently changed.

When I checked it last, it just had that blue box saying 'Is your sig bigger then.....' etc.

I though, aslong as your IMAGE was not bigger then that there would be no problem.

But as above, it was changed and now INCLUDES text.

So yes, I have no problem admitting I was wrong and breaking the rules about my signature, But, I did not know that, hence a PM would of been nice.

585999971[/snapback]

The rules have not changed, they were clarified because some people misinterpreted them but they have not changed.

sigfunny.png

The text says "is your sig bigger than this?"

It does not say "is the image in your sig better than this?"

The original Official Avatar and Signature Guidelines thread from two years ago contains this image:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?act=ST&f=7&t=25368&s=

But I wasnt aware I was breaking the rules and thus in the wrong. Ive read the Signature guidlines, but it was recently changed.

When I checked it last, it just had that blue box saying 'Is your sig bigger then.....' etc.

I though, aslong as your IMAGE was not bigger then that there would be no problem.

But as above, it was changed and now INCLUDES text.

585999971[/snapback]

"Recently" changed? :unsure: I haven't noticed any change in signature guidelines in at least past six months.

I think it's just that moderators decided to be more strict about it from now on.

For example, here's what Armeck said about four months ago, that the sig size should be kept no matter what you have on the sig.

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...#entry585509839

edit/ too late I guess... -o-;;

The last one I read before this was this one:-

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?act=ST&f=7&t=25368&s=

It just says Signature.

Which, was a little vagued.

The one is this post says Including Text

586000000[/snapback]

Look up to my last post. Nothing has changed.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
    • OpenAI is making Codex more useful in Chrome and the cloud by Pradeep Viswanathan OpenAI's Codex now has more than 5 million users, up nearly 4x from earlier this year. To further accelerate Codex's growth among developers, OpenAI today announced that it has agreed to acquire Ona, a company that builds secure cloud execution and orchestration technology for developers. Ona will enable developers to run Codex with persistent and controlled cloud infrastructure for long-running agentic workflows. Right now, most Codex execution happens locally on developers' laptops and PCs, and the agents work continuously for hours. Through Ona, OpenAI aims to make Codex agents keep working for days without being tied to a user’s local machine or an active session. This will be an important capability for enterprises that want to deploy AI agents in production while maintaining control over infrastructure, data, security boundaries, credential scope, logging, and review workflows. Like any acquisition, the deal is still subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals. Until the deal closes, OpenAI and Ona will continue to operate as separate companies. After closing, Ona’s team will join the Codex team to improve developer workflows. Alongside the Ona acquisition announcement, OpenAI today introduced a few Codex updates. Developers can now save Codex rate limit resets and use them later instead of losing them when they are not needed immediately. OpenAI is also adding a referral option where users can invite a friend to Codex and get a saved rate limit reset. OpenAI today also announced a developer mode for browser use in Chrome and the Codex in-app browser. With this mode, Codex can use the Chrome DevTools Protocol to debug web apps, inspect pages, and work more directly with browser-based development workflows. Developers can use this when they want Codex to profile JavaScript, inspect console output and network traffic, examine web page states including the DOM and applied styles, and more.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      186
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!