Recommended Posts

being spiteful gets you no where, but so be it.

585997631[/snapback]

Thanks for the sig Bang you rock. Yankees in 05! hell 06 and 07 for that matter also!

as for the topic. whats the big deal? sigs are a way of people expressing themself. Now I wouldnt put an annoying sig up but everyone has dif tastes.

Let's settle down now. The sig guidelines are there for YOUR benefit. No one wants a massively gaudy sig distracting from the content of the site. Don't like it? I have some forums for you where you can pretty much put up whatever size sig you want. Go post there.

Just as clear as the sig rules are, the appropriate action for reporting someone is to use the reporting system. Why is this so hard to understand?

Excuse me? Mass blob of colours?

Ive just got Adobe Photoshop CS2 and went through some Tutorials about this effect.

I can do them in about 35 seconds from scratch now. I'm pretty good at it now, I find your comment a little harsh considering I spent time on it. Just because you can't see it for whats it worth does not mean others can not.

585997421[/snapback]

I think we can all see what it is.

Isn't there a way to limit the size of sigs? like some sort of fixed cell that the sig go's in, so that it will look cropped if it's to long or wide. Also limit the file size like you do when we try to post pics in a thread.

Then most of these problems will be solved.

Isn't there a way to limit the size of sigs? like some sort of fixed cell that the sig go's in, so that it will look cropped if it's to long or wide. Also limit the file size like you do when we try to post pics in a thread.

Then most of these problems will be solved.

585998885[/snapback]

Width: 380 pixels (okay)

Height: 120 pixels (okay)

Filesize: 70KB (NOT okay)

I apologize but that sig is just to big, you're a cool guy and all but be careful you've been warned numorous times someone might ban you, I hate to see that happen to a person like you.

585997696[/snapback]

I don't care if i'm banned. I've just about had it with this place these days with the half-ass Moderation. Im sure you guys in real life are great guys, but on the forum... your actions and comments leave a lot to desired.. The last year - 6 months tis site in my opinion it has gone down hill. Plenty of other places to post :)

bunch of freaken tattle tales on this board I swear.

I had to take out my subscriber badge cuz someone around here complained about MY TEXT SIG WAS TOO BIG!?

GEEZ :argh:

585997730[/snapback]

LoL. Thats the 'Rules' for you Steven, sad Eh?

I think we can all see what it is.

585998550[/snapback]

Jolly Good! :laugh:

Whats funny is this:-

You can TURN OFF signatures, smiles and the rest of it. You WOULD do that if you was 56k and also use the lo-fi site, No?

Edited by Hypoxiaicon
I don't care if i'm banned. I've just about had it with this place these days with the half-ass Moderation. Im sure you guys in real life are great guys, but on the forum... your actions and comments leave a lot to desired.. The last year - 6 months tis site in my opinion it has gone down hill. Plenty of other places to post :)

LoL. Thats the 'Rules' for you Steven, sad Eh?

Jolly Good!  :laugh:

Whats funny is this:-

You can TURN OFF signatures, smiles and the rest of it. You WOULD do that if you was 56k and also use the lo-fi site, No?

585999272[/snapback]

I don't understand why you insist on barking about how crappy the moderating is, when in the same breath, you call out someone else on their sig being too large.

Bit hypocritical yourself? I realize the point you are trying to make, but you did it completely wrong. Chad noticed your sig. Not Steven's. Eventually, Steven's would have been noticed.

What drives me nuts is that some members think staff has nothing better to do with their time than 'pick on' certain members. Trust me. I'd like nothing better than not having to deal with members breaking the rules...it would certainly make our lives easier.

Bit hypocritical yourself? 

585999856[/snapback]

Hmmm, If thats making a fuss as to why mine was removed and his wasnt in the same thread where he posted, then yes.

Would you question something and make a fuss if something happened to you, yet the person next to you went un-noticed?

Oh, the drama. It's a signature kids. :argh:

Can't we all just get along? :hug_guy: :hug_girl:

I've gone through everybody's signature that had 4-odd thousand posts and up and they are all now in complaince. Nobody is getting special treatment. Well, except the people with less than 4500 posts because I lost patience in the whole process by about that point.

Hmmm, If thats making a fuss as to why mine was removed and his wasnt in the same thread where he posted, then yes.

Would you question something and make a fuss if something happened to you, yet the person next to you went un-noticed?

585999868[/snapback]

His was removed as well.

Would I question it? Not if I was in the wrong. Would I make a fuss that someone else didn't get the same treatment? Not publically and make a spectacle of myself. The report post does a wonderful job of doing this without derailing a thread.

His was removed as well.

Would I question it?  Not if I was in the wrong.  Would I make a fuss that someone else didn't get the same treatment?  Not publically and make a spectacle of myself.  The report post does a wonderful job of doing this without derailing a thread.

585999898[/snapback]

But I wasnt aware I was breaking the rules and thus in the wrong. Ive read the Signature guidlines, but it was recently changed.

When I checked it last, it just had that blue box saying 'Is your sig bigger then.....' etc.

I thought, aslong as your IMAGE was not bigger then that there would be no problem.

But as above, it was changed and now INCLUDES text.

So yes, I have no problem admitting I was wrong and breaking the rules about my signature, But, I did not know that, hence a PM would of been nice.

But I wasnt aware I was breaking the rules and thus in the wrong. Ive read the Signature guidlines, but it was recently changed.

When I checked it last, it just had that blue box saying 'Is your sig bigger then.....' etc.

I thought, aslong as your IMAGE was not bigger then that there would be no problem.

But as above, it was changed and now INCLUDES text.

So yes, I have no problem admitting I was wrong and breaking the rules about my signature, But, I did not know that, hence a PM would of been nice.

585999971[/snapback]

Sorry, you are wrong on that account. That text you are referring to has been there for a long time now.

But I wasnt aware I was breaking the rules and thus in the wrong. Ive read the Signature guidlines, but it was recently changed.

When I checked it last, it just had that blue box saying 'Is your sig bigger then.....' etc.

I though, aslong as your IMAGE was not bigger then that there would be no problem.

But as above, it was changed and now INCLUDES text.

So yes, I have no problem admitting I was wrong and breaking the rules about my signature, But, I did not know that, hence a PM would of been nice.

585999971[/snapback]

The rules have not changed, they were clarified because some people misinterpreted them but they have not changed.

sigfunny.png

The text says "is your sig bigger than this?"

It does not say "is the image in your sig better than this?"

The original Official Avatar and Signature Guidelines thread from two years ago contains this image:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?act=ST&f=7&t=25368&s=

But I wasnt aware I was breaking the rules and thus in the wrong. Ive read the Signature guidlines, but it was recently changed.

When I checked it last, it just had that blue box saying 'Is your sig bigger then.....' etc.

I though, aslong as your IMAGE was not bigger then that there would be no problem.

But as above, it was changed and now INCLUDES text.

585999971[/snapback]

"Recently" changed? :unsure: I haven't noticed any change in signature guidelines in at least past six months.

I think it's just that moderators decided to be more strict about it from now on.

For example, here's what Armeck said about four months ago, that the sig size should be kept no matter what you have on the sig.

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...#entry585509839

edit/ too late I guess... -o-;;

The last one I read before this was this one:-

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?act=ST&f=7&t=25368&s=

It just says Signature.

Which, was a little vagued.

The one is this post says Including Text

586000000[/snapback]

Look up to my last post. Nothing has changed.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know The ONLY thing I need to know is the price, which I know will be way higher than I (and most people) are willing to pay for a phone... so basically nothing here I need to know. PS: Nice job getting that Apple reference to a non-existent and unrevealed product as "competition" in there. Cheque is in the mail.
    • Well I really think the repasting helped if your higher clocks have returned, maybe the next thing to look at is if there is a problem with your case airflow? I guess this because your 3080 has returned to optimal state, but is still staying too warm, which might suggest it was thermal throttling before you repasted, of which the only logical conclusion could be outside factors.
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know by Hamid Ganji Galaxy Z Fold 7 - Image via Samsung The next generation of Samsung foldables is set to be unveiled next month at the second Unpacked event of the year. Samsung’s 2026 foldables are not expected to offer significant upgrades over their predecessors, with the Korean firm instead focusing on design refinements and conventional upgrades such as faster processors and better cameras. However, Samsung is reportedly planning to unveil an all-new passport-style foldable this year to rival Apple’s first foldable iPhone, which is expected to debut this September. Here’s a roundup of everything we know about Samsung’s upcoming foldable devices ahead of their official debut. When can we expect Samsung’s new foldables? The Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 series were unveiled in July, and Samsung is expected to maintain this timeframe in 2026. Based on previous reports from Korean sources, Samsung will hold its Unpacked event on July 22 in London, UK, to pull back the curtain on the Galaxy Z Fold 8 series. The devices are also expected to hit the shelves a few weeks after launch. However, Samsung has yet to announce an official date. A new naming scheme? One of the most interesting changes we might see this year is a new naming scheme for Samsung’s latest foldables. SamMobile reported that since Samsung is expected to unveil three foldables this year, it has adopted a new naming strategy to simplify product identification for customers. Accordingly, the standard Galaxy Z Fold 8 will reportedly be called the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and will serve as the direct successor to last year’s Galaxy Z Fold 7. The “Ultra” suffix suggests the phone could feature higher-end specifications, such as additional rear camera modules. Samsung’s new passport-style foldable is expected to carry the Galaxy Z Fold 8 name without any suffix. This model is reportedly equipped with two rear cameras. No major changes are expected for the Flip model. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 anticipated specs Rumors over the past few months suggest Samsung is preparing several upgrades for its upcoming foldables, although the devices may continue to rely on larger batteries and faster charging speeds rather than dramatic design changes. The primary focus this year is expected to be the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and its wide-screen design. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here are the anticipated specifications for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra based on previous leaks: 6.5-inch outer display and 8-inch inner display, 120Hz refresh rate, and 2,600 nits peak brightness Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, paired with 12GB or 16GB of RAM and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB of storage 4.1mm thickness when unfolded and a weight of 210g 200MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, 10MP or 12MP telephoto camera, 10MP cover camera, and 10MP selfie camera 5,000mAh battery with 45W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 As for the Galaxy Z Flip 8, the device is not expected to be a major departure from its predecessor, although it could become slightly slimmer. Expected specifications include: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600 processor 12GB of RAM with 256GB and 512GB storage options 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X inner dispaly and 4.1-inch Super AMOLED outer dispaly 50MP main camera, 12MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera 4,300mAh battery with 25W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 Samsung’s foldables are also expected to launch with Gemini Intelligence, Google’s AI suite for automating tasks in Android ecosystem. Moreover, given current memory and component costs, some Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 variants could see a price hike. Galaxy Z Fold 8 adopts a wide-screen design The centerpiece of the upcoming Unpacked event could be the Galaxy Z Fold 8, previously rumored as the Galaxy Z Fold Wide. This model adopts a passport-style form factor and is expected to compete directly with Apple’s iPhone Fold. Galaxy Z Fold 8 official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here’s what to expect: 7.6-inch primary OLED display and 5.4-inch cover display, 120Hz refresh rate, 2,600 nits peak brightness, and 4:3 aspect ratio Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, 12GB or 16GB of RAM, and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB storage options 4,800mAh battery with 45W wired charging 50MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera Android 17 and One UI 9 The three new foldable phones are unlikely to be the only devices unveiled at Samsung’s Unpacked event. The company is also expected to introduce the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 and the Galaxy Watch 9 series.
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      141
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      89
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!