Recommended Posts

Just about the very last thing I care about is what my browsers look like! Just so happen to be using IE9 on this screen shot and haven't done a darn thing to it except make the menu bar show up!

Personally,

Tweaking the appearance of almost anything on the computer is a waste of time and usually leads to issues that make people say something "Huh! WTF happened to my s**t"

Man! This is one old a** topic!!

  • 3 weeks later...

Just finished this, it's a custom modification of Speed Dial 2 for Google Chrome, the images were all created by me from scratch which is why it took so damn long.. there used to be a site that had millions of website logos but I can't seem to find it so I decided to create my own.

swVVq.jpg

  • Like 2

I see your your Firefox and I raise you SlimBrowser.

v5VgX.png

There is only one proper response to this. Ladies, gentlemen and hermaphrodites, I present to you: Crazy Browser. With the Colin-UK seal of approval.

crazy.png

There used to be a site that had millions of website logos but I can't seem to find it so I decided to create my own.

I know the one. Userlogos.org, right? I tried going there just now and got a 403 error. Hopefully it's a server issue and the site isn't gone because it had a surprisingly large and dedicated community built around it.

My browser layout is about as simple as they come. I'm using Chrome 21 and have a bookmarks toolbar for my most visited websites. My primary monitor has a resolution of 2560x1600, so websites can appear pretty small when viewed at that resolution (typically I have two browser windows snapped side-by-side).

Desktop:

browserux.jpg

Metro:

browsermetro.jpg

Yes, I'm using a pretty old build of Firefox and yes, I'm still stuck with Windows Vista. The former fits my needs and I don't want/have the time to upgrade, the latter is a pain in the ass that I hope to replace with Windows 7 asap. And yes: I don't give a single **** about "design" or "innovation" on web browser UI and such mundane stuff: I have work to do, not fancy HTML5 effects to howl at during a full moon night :-P

post-431104-0-83594600-1342044108_thumb.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "...a low price of just $340..." I don't think it means what you think it means.
    • This Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 32GB RAM with RGB is a great deal for limited time by Sayan Sen Memory prices have been through the roof for a while, though it seems like things might finally be getting better. If you are in the market for one, then grab this Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5 6000 CL36 kit with RGB for a low price of just $340 (purchase link under the specs table down below). The kit is compatible with both AMD and Intel systems as it supports both EXPO and XMP overclocking profiles, respectively. 6000 MT/s is often the sweet spot for many systems as it provides ample data transfer speed while still being on Gear 1 mode. This Vengeance variant has RGB so if you love bright setups with such lighting, this is a win-win for you. The technical specifications of the Corsair Vengeance memory kit are given in the table below: Specification Value Memory Type DDR5 Memory Size (Total) 32GB Kit Configuration 2 × 16GB Form Factor UDIMM (Desktop) Pin Count 288-pin Speed (Data Rate) 6000 MT/s Speed Rating PC5-48000 Tested CAS Latency 38-44-44-96 Voltage (Tested) 1.35V Performance Profile AMD EXPO & Intel XMP Heat Spreader Aluminum heatspreader Cooling Type Passive (Heatsink) Lighting Ten Zone RGB Software Support Corsair iCUE Get it at the link below: CORSAIR Vengeance RGB DDR5 32GB (2 x 16GB) 6000 CL38 – Gray (CMH32GX5M1E6000Z38): $339.99 (Sold and Shipped by Woot US, Fulfilled by Amazon US) This Woot deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • The very fact that a TPM (v2.0 specifically which is part of the issue I suspect) is now a baseline for any supported Windows installation will naturally mean other vendors will start to leverage it as they know it'll be there. It's called progress, and it's always been the way. A TPM isn't a windows thing, it's just a module designed to securely store keys. Secure boot isn't a Windows thing (although MS are the TCA as I recall hence the upheaval this year as the 2011 certs expire), it's just a way to verify a bootloader is signed. Windows simply leverages them.
    • It's a local account with the ability to reset a password at a very base level. I really don't get the issue that gets whipped up around it But you do you
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      66
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!