Would you ever go back?


Recommended Posts

Not trying to start a fanboyism, so no flaming plz, this is just a harmless question. And admins, if this is somehow a repeat of a past post (dont think it is) then you can close it with no problems.

Ive used knoppix, gnoppix, and ubuntu so far. Im currently on ubuntu, and Ive only been on linux for about 2 or 3 weeks. During this short time, I have found an immense love for linux. Its just so much more controllable, and open ended, compared to windows which has so many restrictions. I keep a dual boot with windows though, because of games, VB class, and quicktime web videos (anyone know a command to install a plugin to get totem to view web videos like this one?). If it wasnt for these things, I would go full linux. I havent had any problems so far caused by spyware or viruses, (lol just me crashing the system with my n00bism, but how else am i gonna learn). If it wasnt for the lil things i listed above, i would never go back to windows.

what are your thoughts on linux at the moment, and would you ever go back to only windows?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/308692-would-you-ever-go-back/
Share on other sites

I use both, OSX and Solaris.

Why? Because they all get the job done in different aspects of computing. So no, I would not go back to any of them, since I never left them.

Linux is good, Linux is nice, it's developing but it has several issues that are part of how the system is built and the core design behind it that I do not personally like. Issues that cannot be fixed without going back to the drawing board and completely building an OS from scratch - on new hardware without any of the legacy constraints of todays antiquated computer technology and thinking.

Same goes for Windows and OSX tho'.

I stopped using Windows about 2? years ago, after dual-booting for around 6 months.

I enjoy the freedom and the administrative power Linux gives me over my PC. It is problem-free for me, and 'just works'. My wife uses Windows, and my kids play a wide variety games, so they use Windows now (they were on Linux, but I didn't want to deal with wine, so bought Windows for them). I have also learned alot> more about computers using Linux than I have ever learned from using Windows.

There is nothing I do that requires Windows, so I have no need to consider going back.

Not going back to windows here, i went back to it after a dissappointing experience with Fedora Core 3, although that was my fault not Fedora's. Ubuntu has made me very pleased, its like being introduced to computers for the first time again and being amazed. I'm still learing the command line and just learned how to succesfully install Nvidia drivers (just look at how many threads i've made. Everyone says keep a windows box around jsut for gaming, but the older i get the less games are entertaining. Although i'm still a big fan of quake i haven't go that working yet ;)

bottom line, NO i won't go back to windows, when longhorn is released i will be building a decent budget rig at that time to experience that OS first hand. Then if i'm not impressed with it i'll just sell the system.

I use both linux and windows. Why? I'm a gamer, and I like to keep up on the latest titles. Sure, I still play Raven Shield, or Ghost Recon, but I also want SWAT4, Battlefield2, and whatever else is in the pipe. Cedega doesn't really cut it.

But for the day to day stuff? I'd say the two platforms are about even.

I use Windows only for MS Money, as my bank needs me to use it (or Quicken) for on-line banking. Other than that, the security, no BSOD, freedom to configure as needed, no EULAs, no defragging, updates that cover every program on my computer, not just the OS, and the multitude of Linux flavors does it for me.

I would think of more stuff, but it is time for dinner.... mmmmmmmm :)

Barney

I "still" get a kick out of the Linux users who are so in love with this operating system and yet still "keep" windows around to play games and program. Man, it's a hypocriticle jungle out there......

585776684[/snapback]

Please make sense, and clerify.

I "still" get a kick out of the Linux users who are so in love with this operating system and yet still "keep" windows around to play games and program. Man, it's a hypocriticle jungle out there......

585776684[/snapback]

People keep it around because they have to. Unless they're playing Doom 3 or UT2004 (or some other games), they need windows in order to play those games. I'm sure that most of these people would get rid of windows completely given the oppurtunity.

I "still" get a kick out of the Linux users who are so in love with this operating system and yet still "keep" windows around to play games and program. Man, it's a hypocriticle jungle out there......

585776684[/snapback]

What? Complaining about Linux distros or Apple's systems not running games extensively designed for Windows is like complaining about not being able to run games exclusively designed for your X-BOX on your Nintendo GameCube. Point?

At least in many instances painstakingly difficult work has gone into getting some Windows stuff to work under Crossover Office, Cedega, and WINE.

I used Gentoo for a long while, but ultimately, no matter how much configuring and how many different WM's I tried, it still felt like beta software, to be honest.

I kept it around, because it worked well enough for everything, and I liked using it, but one day, I came back to windows, and haven't left since.

I doubled my framerate in UT2004 when I switched to windows. That says a whole lot about Linux Gaming, even when games are designed to run on it. (And yes, I'm sure it wasn't just my driver configuration, etc)

I "still" get a kick out of the Linux users who are so in love with this operating system and yet still "keep" windows around to play games and program. Man, it's a hypocriticle jungle out there......

585776684[/snapback]

Trollllllllllllllllll :no:

I'm Linux-only and don't intend to ever look back - not really, that is. OTOH, I'm into game development, and while Linux is a great development platform, you have to ensure Windows compatibility if you plan to make a dime (except if you're into console-only development, in that case it doesn't really matter whether you use Windows or Linux)...

Everything I need is available for Linux (and that's quite a lot of stuff), and to play a game once in a while, I prefer my PS2 or Gamecube anytime - except for KOTOR2, which works perfectly with Cedega, and Doom? and UT2004, both available for Linux anyway.

BTW, anyone checked the recent news on KDE's Tenor technology? That's the type of stuff I simply love about Linux: it would be next to impossible to introduce and deploy a framework like that at a large scale on any proprietary operating system (no, Apple's Spotlight or WinFS doesn't cut it - Tenor is even more advanced than Beagle, and will be deeply rooted in the KDE framework).

I "still" get a kick out of the Linux users who are so in love with this operating system and yet still "keep" windows around to play games and program. Man, it's a hypocriticle jungle out there......

585776684[/snapback]

*cough*

Just because we "keep" Window$ to play games that dont run in Linux, or with Cedega, or winex, means we don't like Linux? Man, it's a judgemental jungle out there...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Those are some popular multiplayer games. But hardly "all". Just those that don't work on Linux currently due to specific anti-cheat implementations. I think it's also fair to point out the literally thousands of games that don't work on the PS5. And it's not locked at 1080p. That's the default, which you can change.
    • Ubuntu Livepatch arrives on Arm64 to eliminate system reboots for kernel updates by Paul Hill Canonical has just announced that its Livepatch service now supports computers with Arm64 processors. For those who are not familiar, Livepatch allows users to apply important kernel updates without any service interruption or rebooting. While home users will benefit from this, it’s even more important for critical machines that absolutely should not be going offline at all. The feature is available as part of Ubuntu Core 26 for Arm64 and Ubuntu Core 20 and onwards for AMD64. According to Canonical, this will improve the security of systems that aren’t security-maintained daily or weekly, and it helps organizations work towards Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) compliance. If you are familiar with Ubuntu, you probably know that most packages can be updated without having to restart the system. There is one big exception to this, and that’s the kernel; it typically requires you to reload the system to boot into the new kernel. With Livepatch, Canonical has done something so that you don’t need to restart to begin using the new kernel. Aside from Ubuntu Core 26, users with Arm64 chips running Ubuntu 26.04 LTS can also use Livepatch. If you want to learn more about Livepatch, check out its product page. There, you can also find a button to join Ubuntu Pro (it’s free for several home devices) so that you can enable Livepatch. By linking your computer to Ubuntu Pro, you will also extend the life of your Ubuntu install from five years to ten years. If you are running Ubuntu, let us know in the comments if you have been looking forward to this feature on your ARM-based computer. If you’ve had a compatible AMD64 machine for a while and never used this feature, let us know why in the comments!
    • Meta announces a major leadership change at WhatsApp by Pradeep Viswanathan Meta has announced a major leadership change at WhatsApp, with Will Cathcart stepping down after seven years of leading the world's largest messaging platform. CRED CEO and founder Kunal Shah will take over as the next global head of WhatsApp. CRED is an Indian fintech company focused on creditworthy consumers. As part of the transition, Meta is also making a minority investment in CRED through its Series H funding round. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said Will Cathcart will remain at Meta and move into a new role focused on building new products from the ground up. Cathcart led WhatsApp during a major growth phase, helping the app reach more than 3 billion users worldwide. He also played a key role in expanding WhatsApp’s business offerings while keeping privacy and end-to-end encryption central to the product. Meta’s Chief Product Officer, Chris Cox, said Kunal Shah was selected after a search for a leader who understands WhatsApp’s global scale and future potential. In a leaked internal memo, Cox described Shah as a “serial founder” and one of India’s most respected entrepreneurs, adding that he brings “entrepreneurial energy” and a strong product mindset to the role. As part of the Series H funding round, CRED is raising ₹8,550 crore, or about $900 million, in a round led by Meta. The funding values CRED at ₹43,239 crore, or about $4.5 billion, on a post-money basis. It is important to note that this investment will not give Meta access to CRED customer information. Kunal posted the following on X regarding his new role at Meta: Although Kunal Shah will be stepping away from his operating role as CRED CEO, he will retain his personal shareholding in the company.
    • It wouldn't be hard for me to turn off my TV, if I had one. For one thing, I never scroll Instagram. The only reason I have an account is because Meta created one when it merged the account systems for its various services.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      98
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!