Would you ever go back?


Recommended Posts

I use Linux for most of my work. Especially programming and development. But I also use Windows for games. Right now, I lost my Linux HD when it failed and started its banging and not working stuff. So, I am in Windows now. But as soon as I replace the hard drive and get gentoo installed, I'll be back to the Linux thing.

Also, on a side note, I think that as soon as people start writing a good Direct X system for Linux, it'll start to be viable for games, and I will be able to leave Windows for good. Ah, Anybody care to get a good Direct X emulator working?

--Alex

OK. Then let me ask this. Do you not ACTUALLY install the programs in Linux? And how does that front end work? Where do the updates actually come from for Linux as far as the apt-get? If I should post these dumb questions somewhere else, let me know.

As soon as someone sides with windows, someone bashes them??  Anyway I have a dual boot with SuSe and XP.  I dont think i will ever fully switch over to linux, its just too much trouble to do some of the simplest things, such as install my ATI drivers, that was just rediculous.  I love the way linux looks and feels, and will always keep it around, but for me it just dosent quite cut it.

585778714[/snapback]

Totally agree with you!! I like the look and feeling of linux, but some things are just to much trouble to get it working. I just use my pc (XP) as a tool and I don't want to fix or build the tool first to be able to work with it. And if you know your way in the registry of windows it is VERY tweakable as is linux.

So for me linux is nice to lay around with.....windows is good to work with!!

Linux is for the user who wants to understand, not for ignorant spectators.

I hate seeing posts like, I use the network configuration tool and it didn't work, or I used SWAT and samba doesn't work, or my soundcard wasn't autodetected, what do I do? I understand everyone starts somewhere, but I learned on my own, using google, and most importantly the command line.

I use Linux on my desktops and have to say I don't have any trouble. If you want to understand how things work, use Linux or unix, if you don't care, use OSX or Windows.

585794492[/snapback]

Yeah, but do you use Linux to get things done or do you use linux just to get linux running??

Plain and easy a standard pc user will never be able to get linux running out of the box and that's is exactly what most people want...they want a tool to get stuff done.

  If I use windows on the other hand, files are often left behind and registry keys don't get deleted.  Windows programs also like to scatter files around.  Some in program files, others in the windows directory, and maybe other files in random places.  Not good.  In linux (or any other unix(-like) system), there's a very specific order to things.  Program binaries in bin, system binaries in sbin, configuration files in etc, data in shared, changing data in var, libraries in lib and include files in include.

Another thing about linux is that every program on the system is available from the command line.  That takes me two (very close) click to get to and then I can do just about anything.

585799393[/snapback]

That files and reg keys stay in place when you uninstall an app is not the fault of MS but of the firm that made the installer. I'm a scripter myself and work alot with WISE. If you don't script your software the right way it will leave stuff behind. If you do it the right way it will not uninstall it will do a total roll back of the system leaving it as it was before the installation

And about using the command line to start applications......in windows every application can be started with the command line: start "name of exeutable"

Plain and easy a standard pc user will never be able to get linux running out of the box and that's is exactly what most people want...they want a tool to get stuff done.

585806750[/snapback]

Most "casual PC users" don't have the slightest clue how to install XP in the first place.

All they know is how to click the IE, Word or generic Office icons on the desktop or launch a game.

With suitable and tested hardware, installing a boxed product like SUSE is pretty much straightforward and clicking next for the majority of the installation. With the "out of the box" installation you'll have majority of your generic tools that you need for normal computer use in the first place.

You'll have your web browser, a word processor, spreadsheet, multimedia applications for playing music, video viewing tools etc.

That files and reg keys stay in place when you uninstall an app is not the fault of MS but of the firm that made the installer.

You should never, EVER put anything in registry. Storing information in the registry is the devil, as I recall Microsoft never meant registry to be a storage for other companies in the first place.

You should never, EVER put anything in registry. Storing information in the registry is the devil, as I recall Microsoft never meant registry to be a storage for other companies in the first place.

585806847[/snapback]

everything you install etc. is stored in the registry...without the registry you have nothing!!! So also third party software is stored in registry else it would never run. So I don't understand your remark about this!!!!

I've love to be able to switch to Linux, and just embrace and use it. I used to use it in my last job for server stuff where it kicked ass well and truely, but i've just become so frustrated with trying to make it work with modern hardware that I don't bother with it on my home PC any more. Case in point is the optical out port on my NF7-S v2.0 into a set of Cambridge DTT3500's.. i've never ever managed to get the rear speakers to play sound under Linux despite reading more FAQ's, and more .asoundrc files than I care to mention.

Its a wonderful OS, and great to tinker with.. I love the speed of it, and the reliability of it.. but sadly the only *NIX OS i'll ever possibly switch to will be MacOSX if/when I finally get a Mac! :(

So also third party software is stored in registry else it would never run. So I don't understand your remark about this!!!!

585806873[/snapback]

ORIGINALLY it wasn't meant for storing the information, only after companies started dumping everything there it became "an accepted standard".

I prefer .ini and .XML files for storing information - stored in the directory where the program is installed. Once you remove the directory, the software is gone forever, no crap left behind in the registry causing bloat.

Also, on a side note, I think that as soon as people start writing a good Direct X system for Linux, it'll start to be viable for games, and I will be able to leave Windows for good.

585806658[/snapback]

It's already viable for games. You have OpenGL, openAL and SDL... there's no need to implement DirectX unless you want to run Windows' games, which has nothing to do with linux' viability as gaming platform.

Anyway, there's a project to add full DirectX support to Wine. That would centainly help to increase the number of linux gamers, but what we really need is more developers to write games that run natively on linux with no DirectX requirements.

Well I'm sort of switching soon actually. Sort of. My laptops hardware, being a Sony, isn't wonderfully supported under Linux. The intel8x0 module for my soundcard can't support dmixing properly, which is a pain. Also, no matter what I've tried, DRI just seems to hate my chipset (i830M). The chip should be supported, but X just freezes as soon as I load DRI. That's a real bugger, as I can't run Luminosity or any other OpenGL stuff in the future without emulation.

So I'm buying a PowerBook G4 12", and maybe a 20" Apple screen --money permitting -- this summer for University. It shouldn't be difficult to fund, with a job at Tesco for the summer and Student Loan :) I really can't wait, the PowerBook even comes with BlueTooth, so I can link it with my Phone, and OSX is just so pretty! It's not particulary fast, and it was a tough decision not to go for a new Sony. But I descided that the endless hours I spend hacking around with Linux just isn't worth my time. I'll always run Gentoo on my workstation, though, Linux is always fun to mess with, I just don't want to have to do the same on a laptop.Things are always changing with Linux, software is 100% free, somthing you don't get with Windows or Mac, and I'll miss that.

OK.  Then let me ask this.  Do you not ACTUALLY install the programs in Linux?  And how does that front end work?  Where do the updates actually come from for Linux as far as the apt-get?  If I should post these dumb questions somewhere else, let me know.

585806713[/snapback]

Noticed noone actually answered your question farme...so here goes.

You actually install programs in linux, although the method is different from distro to distro.

Debian uses apt-get, and the apt-get frontend Synaptic. Each Debian based distro has a server with a software repository that is continually updated by members of the coding team and the community.

The server's address is kept in a text file on your system, as well as a list of what you have installed. This is not the same as a registry, more like a "versions" list.

Once you fire up a terminal (or open synaptic), and type apt-get install GIMP, the script locates the file on the server, calculates the dependencies, downloads it, unpacks it, and installs it. Synaptic does the same thing, only through a graphical front end.

For people that have linux experience, terminal is faster, although I like Synaptic because it's like going to a mall: you might see something that you didn't know you wanted.

RPM based distros (Fedora, Mandrake, SUSE) can also use Synaptic, although uprpmi has evolved as a seperate solution. Not a bog fan of RPM distros, so I can't testify as to how well those solutions work.

Source based distros (Slackware, Vector, Gentoo) have their own methods of installation that are similar in idea to apt-get (Slack-get, Portage). They are both terminal based, but fast and flexible.

Hope that helps!

^^^ Maybe a good clarification to that is that Linux apps are not "installed" in the same sense that Windows apps are.

In Linux, all you need to do is put the executable in a /bin/ directory, and it can be run. The package managers do a thorough job, and add in the man pages and so forth, plus will determine if any libraries are used by your new app that you don't yet have, and will get those "dependencies" for you.

Functionally, however, Linux apps just exist on the drive and can be run.

.XML files work as a good alternative to the registary.

585806886[/snapback]

meh, XML is very cryptic for plain file editing, and unless you need that structure, it's better to stay away from it. My favorite is delimiter seperated values (think, /etc/passwd). Very space efficent and easy to read.

meh, XML is very cryptic for plain file editing, and unless you need that structure, it's better to stay away from it. My favorite is delimiter seperated values (think, /etc/passwd). Very space efficent and easy to read.

585810275[/snapback]

I think what sting3r was getting at was that XML files allow you to use the same heirarchical structure that the registry offers, therefore being a true alternative to the registry for a program. Delimited-value files would only work as an alternative under certain circumstances.

I used to be in the "Linux is God" crowd, and ran it on my desktop extensively.

Windows is just better, better quality software and drivers. Most Linux software I used was usually buggy open-source projects. The desktop enviroments (KDE/GNOME) were not even close to the desktop for 2000,XP, etc. I just found it a waste of time and a hassle.

Linux is great for a small web, email, irc, whatever server but not for the desktop. And in a corporate enviroment for managing users, etc for desktop machines nothing beats 2003.

It's already viable for games. You have OpenGL, openAL and SDL... there's no need to implement DirectX unless you want to run Windows' games, which has nothing to do with linux' viability as gaming platform.

Anyway, there's a project to add full DirectX support to Wine. That would centainly help to increase the number of linux gamers, but what we really need is more developers to write games that run natively on linux with no DirectX requirements.

585807014[/snapback]

I was refering to pulling more support from gamers. And getting greater support for Linux. Think about it. If gamers can play all the games in Linux, and have the increased security platform, why use Windows. But I was talking specifically on the conversion of other people basis.

I also agree that developers need to write more games for linux. But, they need incentive. So, we start where we can.

--Alex

Yes I know. And I play most of them. But I was talking in a more business minded sense of getting more people to use linux. I was making an observation that, when Linux has more games, more gamers will switch to Linux.

--Alex

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!