Recommended Posts

Are you sure it's two years away? Because

a) if it is, I am buying a mac. It's too far away.

b) if it isn't, I can't see how they can make it something extremely good within a year.

I'll just wait and see what progress they are doing, but until now I am extremely disappointed. We waited a whole year. Think about it, last year it was buggy, not really impressive. Now this year it looks like a pile of junk, is lacking of important features and has an overdose of un-needed features.

Microsoft doesn't know how to develop windows anymore... They change the whole Desktop properties panel, then they put the old one back. They take their time developing a sidebar, then they remove it. They take their time developing different themes. All of them are placeholders. They still keep the old stuff from Windows 3.1 in Longhorn, while they had like what, 10 years to delete it and I assume that less DLLs would mean a speed improvement (not a huge one, just an extremely tiny one, but still). They develop a new CTRL+ALT+DEL panel, then they replace it with something from Windows 2000. They change their nice icons to some ugly ones that don't even fit in Windows, while they could just take their huge icon pictures from 4 years ago, edit them a little and put that in Longhorn so that the icons can be 256*256.

Edit : Who said it was quick? When I select some files in explorer it lags like hell with my ATI Radeon 9800 PRO

OF COURSE I will wait and see how it goes. I'm not that stupid... But what I mean is that until now everything is clear in my mind. If this is what they came up with one year of work, I am not sure they're going to make something good with just another year. And Mac OS 10.4 is simply amazing.

Edited by PsykX

I have glass and all running pretty smoothly on my fx5200. Kinda ironic that this card's producing these effects. Fade in and out and the transparancy. Anyone found anything else interesting???

I forced the fx5900 driver on my fx5200 and it's REALLY smooth i can't believe my eyes.

A Microsoft source just told me how to enable DCE in Longhorn 5048. Turns out they couldn't take it out because it broke stuff, so they just hid it. I'll take pictures if I get it working.

http://www.windowsitpro.com/windowspaulthu...rott_46166.html

Are you sure it's two years away? Because

a) if it is, I am buying a mac. It's too far away.

b) if it isn't, I can't see how they can make it something extremely good within a year.

585830110[/snapback]

If you think Macs are the solutions for your problems (whatever they might be), no one is stopping you. But the silly factor here is you're judging something Microsoft exactly didn't want consumers like you to see, yet you chose to see it and judge it. :rolleyes:

Hey, I only wanted to know where they were heading after a full year of work. It's supposed to be a little more than halfway done, so of course I'm starting to have sharp ideas and opinions. That goes with all the other applications Microsoft did lately that cause x problem on my computer. So, sorry if I am whining much these days, but I honestly think Microsoft is laughing of us.

Hey, I only wanted to know where they were heading after a full year of work. It's supposed to be a little more than halfway done, so of course I'm starting to have sharp ideas and opinions. That goes with all the other applications Microsoft did lately that cause x problem on my computer. So, sorry if I am whining much these days, but I honestly think Microsoft is laughing of us.

585830195[/snapback]

Very little of the work they've been doing over the past year (or even 3-4 years) is readily visible in this release.

It's true that some work stagnated a bit because of the focus on XP SP2 and Windows Server 2003 SP1, along with the x64 ports. Now with those finished, the main Windows client team can focus more on the Longhorn release.

But beyond that, most of the interesting stuff (search and shell functions, Aero/Glass/DWM, IE 7, msh, Avalon/Indigo, etc) has all proceeded seperate from Longhorn's core development. Those features will be integrated in as they become ready.

It is my hope that around the beta 2 timeframe we'll see a Longhorn release with the new IE, fully-functional DWM, msh, new shell, and all those great features tightly integrated with the OS. I think that will be an impressive sight.

Right now we're seeing Longhorn in little pieces scattered around. I guess some people expected this release to pull together some of those elements. But that's really not what this release was about.

A lot of people are too excited about the effects and DWM... Not because it's not fully functional in this build that LH didnt improve.

Longhorn is progressing and will progress with the time.

When you do programming, you start with the base or the fundamentals and then you put or polish the UI.

You dont create the perfect UI and then the fundamentals!

Anyway my opinion, don't flame me!

What's the progress in the Longhorn over Windows 2000/XP? There are a lot of new GUI features (looks like they are making OS for noob Dell users). That's the feeling i got watching WINHEC. I only hope Microsoft makes an option (install or not to install) Longhorn components...

They are talking about transparency and glass effect o lot. I got that enabled since Radeon 9700Pro release via ATI Hydravision software. Now, I have it via NVIDIA control panel. It's nothing new.

I have feeling that Microsoft wants to make people impressed by Longhorn GUI features. Well, I'm already impressed by Doom 3 graphic, or HL2 graphic...

They are talking about transparency and glass effect o lot. I got that enabled since Radeon 9700Pro release via ATI Hydravision software. Now, I have it via NVIDIA control panel. It's nothing new.

I have feeling that Microsoft wants to make people impressed by Longhorn GUI features.

585830324[/snapback]

They definitely want people to be impressed by the GUI features. But not this year.

The only reason they showed anything of Longhorn's UI at all at WinHEC was to show that Apple isn't the only one innovating in the search/organizational area.

OK for those who wish to see the new effects or at least some of them. Here is a video.

5048 Effects Preview

Guys, MOST windows users dont know about other apps that can make windows transparent and such. So to us power users it may be old, but to the average ITS GREAT!

What's so special about freaking search (that's a question for MS AND APPLE)? I organize the hell out of my own data anyway.

585830370[/snapback]

Organized means nothing.. I have everything organzined but thats like 300gb of data. Why should i have to go through it all even though i know where it is when i can hit ctrl f and get it in 1second. Its all about indexing.

They all stole it from google.

OK for those who wish to see the new effects or at least some of them. Here is a video.

5048 Effects Preview

Guys, MOST windows users dont know about other apps that can make windows transparent and such. So to us power users it may be old, but to the average ITS GREAT!

585830354[/snapback]

That video is the most impressive thing I've seen from the whole LH news today. What hardware were you using to pull that?

Athlon XP 2400+ 2.00GHz

640MB of RAM

ATI Radeon Pro 128mb video card.

Its a little laggy on BIG windows. Im running 1024x768 so windows get big.

Its more RAM then video cards. I ran it on my 9200 saphire and 340mb of ram 1.8ghz alienware and it was ok. Without the effects it performed about the same as this does without em.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!