Recommended Posts

hey what if we have like a php script on the front page which displays the details on the server like sql size, cpu usage, space? and a  link to the specs or someother cool stuff

585870935[/snapback]

Causing more cpu usages, more tables in the database and overall just more load.

It would be cheaper not to use compression on a site this huge... Let's say CPU X costs $320/mo. and it has 6 80GB hdds (scuzzy/SCSI) and a 5GB db... compared to a $400 server with CPU Z and 6 80GB hdds and a 2gb db (compressed)...

And whilst we're on it -> what's average CPU load on Neowin servers?

It would be cheaper not to use compression on a site this huge... Let's say CPU X costs $320/mo. and it has 6 80GB hdds (scuzzy/SCSI) and a 5GB db... compared to a $400 server with CPU Z and 6 80GB hdds and a 2gb db (compressed)...

No, why would we want to compress the data? We've got a RAID 5 machine running the DB right now, so that's more than enough space to hold the DB. Space isn't an issue, speed is. More indexes do cost more disk space, but we don't care when there's a faster query speed to be had.

And whilst we're on it -> what's average CPU load on Neowin servers?

DB server's hovering around 1 (with 2 CPUs). The web servers are more spikey and it depends on the time of day and other factors.

No, why would we want to compress the data? We've got a RAID 5 machine running the DB right now, so that's more than enough space to hold the DB. Space isn't an issue, speed is. More indexes do cost more disk space, but we don't care when there's a faster query speed to be had.

DB server's hovering around 1 (with 2 CPUs). The web servers are more spikey and it depends on the time of day and other factors.

585874335[/snapback]

If speed is an issue why not change to RAID10? Using RAID5 is kinda of killing your performance.isn't it?. :huh:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.