Recommended Posts

hey what if we have like a php script on the front page which displays the details on the server like sql size, cpu usage, space? and a  link to the specs or someother cool stuff

585870935[/snapback]

Causing more cpu usages, more tables in the database and overall just more load.

It would be cheaper not to use compression on a site this huge... Let's say CPU X costs $320/mo. and it has 6 80GB hdds (scuzzy/SCSI) and a 5GB db... compared to a $400 server with CPU Z and 6 80GB hdds and a 2gb db (compressed)...

And whilst we're on it -> what's average CPU load on Neowin servers?

It would be cheaper not to use compression on a site this huge... Let's say CPU X costs $320/mo. and it has 6 80GB hdds (scuzzy/SCSI) and a 5GB db... compared to a $400 server with CPU Z and 6 80GB hdds and a 2gb db (compressed)...

No, why would we want to compress the data? We've got a RAID 5 machine running the DB right now, so that's more than enough space to hold the DB. Space isn't an issue, speed is. More indexes do cost more disk space, but we don't care when there's a faster query speed to be had.

And whilst we're on it -> what's average CPU load on Neowin servers?

DB server's hovering around 1 (with 2 CPUs). The web servers are more spikey and it depends on the time of day and other factors.

No, why would we want to compress the data? We've got a RAID 5 machine running the DB right now, so that's more than enough space to hold the DB. Space isn't an issue, speed is. More indexes do cost more disk space, but we don't care when there's a faster query speed to be had.

DB server's hovering around 1 (with 2 CPUs). The web servers are more spikey and it depends on the time of day and other factors.

585874335[/snapback]

If speed is an issue why not change to RAID10? Using RAID5 is kinda of killing your performance.isn't it?. :huh:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      189
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!