• 0

Your favourite Antivirus?


  

2295 members have voted

  1. 1. Your favourite Antivirus?

    • Avast!
      193
    • AVG
      306
    • BitDefender
      42
    • Kaspersky
      261
    • McAfee
      154
    • NOD32
      633
    • Norton/Symantec
      435
    • Panda
      29
    • Trend Micro
      81
    • Other
      161


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
I've been wondering about F-Prot for a while now. My parents have a fairly old laptop with only 128MB of RAM (can't upgrade) and I've heard that F-Prot only uses about 5MB of RAM, which is fairly appealing.

How well does it stand up to the more "full bodied" AV programs?

586109651[/snapback]

I can recomment eTrust EZ AntiVirus too for such systems, F-Prot might not be user friendly enough...

  • 0

I prefer NOD32, and I hate Norton...

NOD32 is clean, fast installation, easy configuration, fast in-depth scanning of computer which done within 25 minutes...

Norton is bulky, extremely slow installation, simple configuration that is useless, in-depth scanning takes me an hour, but there is only 2GB of data...

  • 0

i'm a recent convert to Kaspersky. Before i used Bit Defender 8 (Pro); but lately its been buggy and for some reason clashing with other programs.

one thing i had to do with Kaspersky though was turn off the real time network scan since it wasnt allowing me access to the internet (i connect through a router which is hooked to 3 other computers and the cable modem)

annoying, but meh - i love Kaspersky now.

:D

  • 0

It's all about NOD32, with maybe the exception being SAV, tested the lot for work.

Came out with a hatred for Norton though, had a scripting error recently? It's a joke, after 2 hours on the phone to them they admitted they had a problem with it, didn't know what caused it and would get back to me, that and needing 512meg to run at a half decent speed.

But then they make SAV too, which tbh is probably the best of the lot, small, clean and fast, just what AV should be, and it does catch the lot.

  • 0

I personally use McAffe 8.0i Enterprise Edition. It is what my school uses, and what I install on all of my clients machines. Thing is, there is alot of variety in the preferences among the different posters here. I knew that I would see that but, when does the time come for a more unfied solution for a very common issue. While many can't even figure out how to protect our machines, new software for creating/modifing malware gets released, and updated faster.

Case in point.

About a year ago in another IRC channel that I frequent on of the channel operators was bragging for about 8 lines about how AMAZING his company's shiny new f-Secure antivirus software package. I asked him if he would care to scan a file for me, and he obliged. It was go time.

I quickly went online and googled for the oldest version of everyone's favorite, Back Oriface. Some quick work with a hex editor, UPX packer, few NOP bytes here and there, and some Aphex for a little 'encryption' on the exe and off the baby went, launched away into a cruel world via DCC.

The scanning result? Clean.

Why? No behavior-based sandbox-type solution. Not that McAffe has this either, but when it is important to know for sure a Virtual Machine with a nice OS/filesystem monitoring toolbox is the ticket.

  • 0
avg is free. that's all i care about. someof the ones out there have tooo amny features that the average user doesn't need.

586147634[/snapback]

Yes, like a lot better detection rates, advanced heuristics, better integration into the OS, ThreatSense.Net system, increadibly fast scanning speed...should i continue?

  • 0

I tryed many many antivirus programs. Long ago I used McAfee than Norton and than wanted to try something else. I downloaded demos of almost all from the pool and...

I looked for something with simple, clear interface and settings but still with good protection and regular updates. After trying all the demos I decided to stick with Avast! Free. It has everything I need. Although I found out that for scanning e.g. AVI files it takes a lot longer than some other programs, because avast! actually scans them, although it might not be needed to, I still like it.

However, it is hard for me to say how efficient it is, because I have not got any virus in this millennium. Just some scripts on websites which avast! successfully blocked.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Valve finally confirms Steam Machine prices, starts at $1049 for 512GB option by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The $1,428 option The Steam Hardware lineup that Valve announced last year is slowly starting to roll out. Following the recent Steam Controller launch, Valve has now confirmed the price of the Steam Machine, its all-in-one console-like solution for PC gaming in the living room. There are currently four variants being presented, with only the storage and the included controller being the biggest differences. All of the Steam Machines have the same internals consisting of a semi-custom AMD Zen 4 CPU with six cores and 12 threads, an RDNA 3 28CU GPU, 16GB of DDR5 memory, and 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM, all inside the familiar box Valve has been showing off for months now. The Steam Machine base model starts at $1,049. This has a 512GB NVMe SSD but does not come with a Steam Controller. Keep in mind that storage can be expanded with the microSD card slot too. Next, the $1,128 model has the exact same storage as the previous one but it does come with the new Steam Controller. If you need the Steam Machine to have more storage for games and apps than that, then the 2TB tiers are also available. The $1,349 Steam Machine has no controller once again, but it does ship with two extra faceplates (red fabric and solid walnut) to replace the standard black one. The final option costs $1,428, and it adds the controller back into the bundle. The Steam Machine ships with the Linux-based SteamOS. The box has a 1 Gigabit Ethernet port, DisplayPort 1.4, and HDMI 2.0, as well as one USB-C and four USB-A ports. Keep in mind that when purchasing standalone, the Steam Controller has a $100 price tag. With the above bundles, that drops to $80. It's a rather expensive machine for the internals it is touting, though the design and small form factor do help it somewhat. However, at the same time, the lack of upgradability hurts it. Valve says the ongoing parts shortages and massive price hikes for memory were the leading causes for this price. "The overall effect is that our original goal for the price of Steam Machine is no longer viable," added the company. "So the prices we're sharing today reflect the state of the world for manufacturing; or, more accurately, it reflects the price of the components as we've secured them over the past 6 months." Valve wants interested gamers to reserve it now to get the chance to pre-order a Steam Machine starting June 25, with shipping starting on June 29. Head here to sign up. The invites to buy it will be sent in a randomized order.
    • What the press release doesn’t mention, however, is how much water the natural gas plant itself will consume, Natural gas plants use about 2,803 gallons of water per megawatt-hour produced, which is significantly less than coal-fired plants that use around 19,185 gallons per megawatt-hour. Overall, natural gas plants are more water-efficient, using 584% less water than traditional power plants on average. AI generated
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      203
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!