• 0

Your favourite Antivirus?


  

2295 members have voted

  1. 1. Your favourite Antivirus?

    • Avast!
      193
    • AVG
      306
    • BitDefender
      42
    • Kaspersky
      261
    • McAfee
      154
    • NOD32
      633
    • Norton/Symantec
      435
    • Panda
      29
    • Trend Micro
      81
    • Other
      161


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

im always switching around ive used, norton (few versions) panda, avg, ZA secuirty suites AV and avast and so far ive found avg to be the best one, im keen to try this nod32 and kapersky

just out of curiosity is thier a firewall thread like this also? i have the same situation with firewalls

  • 0

interesting thread... probably one of the best on neowin just now ..

i'm about to change from norton 2003 ....

I saw Panda running well on a friend's pc and might try it ... anyone had bad experiences with Panda Titanium 2006 ?

Other than that, from reading the posts, I'm torn between AVG, Kapersky, & NOD32 ...

  • 0

i just got symantec antivirus corporate edition, we'll see how that goes.

Well, I've used Norton AV, Kaspersky, NOD32, AVG, and finally Symantec AV, and I would have to say my favorite out of all is Symantec. I'm talking about the Corporate edition... It's so nice on resources and so very out of the way... Me likes it very much :D

Throughout my IT career I have done a lot of testing of AV products. When I started consulting on my own I wanted an AV solution that I could sell to my clients that was highly effective yet simple enough for the average client to feel comfortable with. After sitting down and evaluating numerous products and having years of experience with others, I settled on Avast. Pricing is very competitive, the scanning engine is one of the best, they update both software and definitions religiously, and management is as simple as can be. Since I started recommending and installing Avast for my clients, I have replaced 3 Symantec Corporate installs with multiple servers and multiple clients on each. They were all fully updated, with both the latest software and virus definition updates, and more than half of the PCs on the networks of each of those three clients had numerous viruses that Symantec Corporate had been missing.

  • 0

Throughout my IT career I have done a lot of testing of AV products. When I started consulting on my own I wanted an AV solution that I could sell to my clients that was highly effective yet simple enough for the average client to feel comfortable with. After sitting down and evaluating numerous products and having years of experience with others, I settled on Avast. Pricing is very competitive, the scanning engine is one of the best, they update both software and definitions religiously, and management is as simple as can be. Since I started recommending and installing Avast for my clients, I have replaced 3 Symantec Corporate installs with multiple servers and multiple clients on each. They were all fully updated, with both the latest software and virus definition updates, and more than half of the PCs on the networks of each of those three clients had numerous viruses that Symantec Corporate had been missing.

Well, that's good to know. Even though I'm happy with SAV it's nice to see what other people say from their own experiences. I've been thinking about trying Avast, and it looks like you tipped me over the edge on it. I'm going to give it a try.

  • 0

Lol there's alot of FUD around here. First off Nod 32 does not have an unbeatable track record, unless you consider VB tests to be more important than real world, and it does not catch everything thrown at it.

The amount of processes that a program uses is unimportant, if you had 5 processes taking 4k each it would still be less for instance than one process taking up 21k of memory. Or what about cpu time?

Pop3 scanning is not a necessity so long as you have the active scanner going, there's no reason why an anti virus programs pop3 scanner should catch something your active scanner doesn't or vice versa.

That said Nod 32 is a pretty good AV. I still prefer McAfee's professional line although thier home version has gone down the drain, Norton and McAfee should both get props for having such good sales despite thier mediocre home versions.

  • 0

has anyone tried out Kaspersky 2006 ? (still in beta though) ..

I'd like to hear if anyone had good or bad experiences with it .. looks good though, and Kaspersky is a good antivirus ..

Wow, that looks really nice - a huge improvement over earlier versions. I always liked Kaspersky but I went with NOD32 because it made less of an impact upon my system. If they improve it's speed then I can't see a downside to it.

  • 0

I'm getting some good results with the Kaspersky 6 beta (although all I have to compare it against so-far is norton, and anything is faster than that !)

having said that, it has picked up some files that norton missed, and it's scanning engine seems good. mem usage sometimes goes crazy in the web antivirus mode though .. but it's still a beta .. I will stick with it for now & see what happens. Their forums make good reading for the beta tests ..

a friend installed nod32 on a 1.7centrino laptop with 1gb memory, etc .. it seemed to me to be running about the same speed in its scanning as kaspersky 6 beta

  • 0

Norton: Mediocre detection rate

McAffee: Gives you absolutely no clue about the state of its updates (date, version, etc.). Detection rate mediocre.

Kaspersky: Best detection rate there is, but VERY slow (at least in versions 5)

Panda: Very good detection rate and quite fast, but hooks deep into your system and might conflict with other low-level network software like firewalls.

  • 0

just looking at Antivir's website and it says the premiem edition has pop3 scanning, so the free one doesn't?

You are correct. I guess that's the one knock I have against it, but doesn't really give you less protection, it just means it isn't as proactive as an AV solution that is scanning your incoming POP3.

Basically, I have my Gmail account running through TB so my incoming email has already been scanned on Google's end of the deal. To take this a bit further, even if I was using my ISP's email, I'd have to download a virus and attempt to execute it in order to get infected, but ideally, AntiVir's scanner would catch it (with its higher detection rates than the other free solutions). I think common sense comes into play in this scenario as well, I always treat emails from people I don't recognize or with attachments with a healthy amount of suspicion. :shiftyninja:

What worries me, is that someone might choose something like AVG over AntiVir, because it offers POP3 scanning, even though its detection rates are a heck of alot lower. :)

I am now preparing myself to get flamed by our resident AV experts who may disagree with this philosophy! :p

  • 0

I like your key... :|

that screenie isn't of mine - I got that from Google images search :D :D

had to dump it for now though - when reading their forums (it's a beta, anyway) I noticed there were probs with avedesk, which I had too, along with some mail issues that I didn't even notice, so back to norton 2003 until it finishes it's beta or I decide on another to use.

Was going to use Panda titanium - but some neowinians have put me off it with tales of deadly destruction ... :rolleyes:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • As I've been usually saying lately - we all can thank "AI" for this.
    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • We aren't even at the all-star game and Microsoft is talking about an update that will most likely be released during the World Series if not after. A lot can happen in the world between now and the 2026 World Series, including the 2026 FIFA Cup. Tell me about it again after the FIFA Cup is concluded. That should allow plenty of time to prepare for it.
    • Great, tell me when I have a "Bad Pool Caller" elsewhere not in Windoze.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      540
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      80
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!