• 0

Your favourite Antivirus?


  

2295 members have voted

  1. 1. Your favourite Antivirus?

    • Avast!
      193
    • AVG
      306
    • BitDefender
      42
    • Kaspersky
      261
    • McAfee
      154
    • NOD32
      633
    • Norton/Symantec
      435
    • Panda
      29
    • Trend Micro
      81
    • Other
      161


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

im always switching around ive used, norton (few versions) panda, avg, ZA secuirty suites AV and avast and so far ive found avg to be the best one, im keen to try this nod32 and kapersky

just out of curiosity is thier a firewall thread like this also? i have the same situation with firewalls

  • 0

interesting thread... probably one of the best on neowin just now ..

i'm about to change from norton 2003 ....

I saw Panda running well on a friend's pc and might try it ... anyone had bad experiences with Panda Titanium 2006 ?

Other than that, from reading the posts, I'm torn between AVG, Kapersky, & NOD32 ...

  • 0

i just got symantec antivirus corporate edition, we'll see how that goes.

Well, I've used Norton AV, Kaspersky, NOD32, AVG, and finally Symantec AV, and I would have to say my favorite out of all is Symantec. I'm talking about the Corporate edition... It's so nice on resources and so very out of the way... Me likes it very much :D

Throughout my IT career I have done a lot of testing of AV products. When I started consulting on my own I wanted an AV solution that I could sell to my clients that was highly effective yet simple enough for the average client to feel comfortable with. After sitting down and evaluating numerous products and having years of experience with others, I settled on Avast. Pricing is very competitive, the scanning engine is one of the best, they update both software and definitions religiously, and management is as simple as can be. Since I started recommending and installing Avast for my clients, I have replaced 3 Symantec Corporate installs with multiple servers and multiple clients on each. They were all fully updated, with both the latest software and virus definition updates, and more than half of the PCs on the networks of each of those three clients had numerous viruses that Symantec Corporate had been missing.

  • 0

Throughout my IT career I have done a lot of testing of AV products. When I started consulting on my own I wanted an AV solution that I could sell to my clients that was highly effective yet simple enough for the average client to feel comfortable with. After sitting down and evaluating numerous products and having years of experience with others, I settled on Avast. Pricing is very competitive, the scanning engine is one of the best, they update both software and definitions religiously, and management is as simple as can be. Since I started recommending and installing Avast for my clients, I have replaced 3 Symantec Corporate installs with multiple servers and multiple clients on each. They were all fully updated, with both the latest software and virus definition updates, and more than half of the PCs on the networks of each of those three clients had numerous viruses that Symantec Corporate had been missing.

Well, that's good to know. Even though I'm happy with SAV it's nice to see what other people say from their own experiences. I've been thinking about trying Avast, and it looks like you tipped me over the edge on it. I'm going to give it a try.

  • 0

Lol there's alot of FUD around here. First off Nod 32 does not have an unbeatable track record, unless you consider VB tests to be more important than real world, and it does not catch everything thrown at it.

The amount of processes that a program uses is unimportant, if you had 5 processes taking 4k each it would still be less for instance than one process taking up 21k of memory. Or what about cpu time?

Pop3 scanning is not a necessity so long as you have the active scanner going, there's no reason why an anti virus programs pop3 scanner should catch something your active scanner doesn't or vice versa.

That said Nod 32 is a pretty good AV. I still prefer McAfee's professional line although thier home version has gone down the drain, Norton and McAfee should both get props for having such good sales despite thier mediocre home versions.

  • 0

has anyone tried out Kaspersky 2006 ? (still in beta though) ..

I'd like to hear if anyone had good or bad experiences with it .. looks good though, and Kaspersky is a good antivirus ..

Wow, that looks really nice - a huge improvement over earlier versions. I always liked Kaspersky but I went with NOD32 because it made less of an impact upon my system. If they improve it's speed then I can't see a downside to it.

  • 0

I'm getting some good results with the Kaspersky 6 beta (although all I have to compare it against so-far is norton, and anything is faster than that !)

having said that, it has picked up some files that norton missed, and it's scanning engine seems good. mem usage sometimes goes crazy in the web antivirus mode though .. but it's still a beta .. I will stick with it for now & see what happens. Their forums make good reading for the beta tests ..

a friend installed nod32 on a 1.7centrino laptop with 1gb memory, etc .. it seemed to me to be running about the same speed in its scanning as kaspersky 6 beta

  • 0

Norton: Mediocre detection rate

McAffee: Gives you absolutely no clue about the state of its updates (date, version, etc.). Detection rate mediocre.

Kaspersky: Best detection rate there is, but VERY slow (at least in versions 5)

Panda: Very good detection rate and quite fast, but hooks deep into your system and might conflict with other low-level network software like firewalls.

  • 0

just looking at Antivir's website and it says the premiem edition has pop3 scanning, so the free one doesn't?

You are correct. I guess that's the one knock I have against it, but doesn't really give you less protection, it just means it isn't as proactive as an AV solution that is scanning your incoming POP3.

Basically, I have my Gmail account running through TB so my incoming email has already been scanned on Google's end of the deal. To take this a bit further, even if I was using my ISP's email, I'd have to download a virus and attempt to execute it in order to get infected, but ideally, AntiVir's scanner would catch it (with its higher detection rates than the other free solutions). I think common sense comes into play in this scenario as well, I always treat emails from people I don't recognize or with attachments with a healthy amount of suspicion. :shiftyninja:

What worries me, is that someone might choose something like AVG over AntiVir, because it offers POP3 scanning, even though its detection rates are a heck of alot lower. :)

I am now preparing myself to get flamed by our resident AV experts who may disagree with this philosophy! :p

  • 0

I like your key... :|

that screenie isn't of mine - I got that from Google images search :D :D

had to dump it for now though - when reading their forums (it's a beta, anyway) I noticed there were probs with avedesk, which I had too, along with some mail issues that I didn't even notice, so back to norton 2003 until it finishes it's beta or I decide on another to use.

Was going to use Panda titanium - but some neowinians have put me off it with tales of deadly destruction ... :rolleyes:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
    • This is a none story - these low volume Chinese models will always get new experimental features first because Apple and Samsung can't produce them in huge volume to meet demand.
    • Nvidia GeForce NOW gains support for Dark Scrolls, Empulse, and more by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final update of June for Nvidia's cloud gaming service GeForce NOW is now available, and it is touting support for six more games. The company is also drawing subscriber attention towards the summer sales kicking off across stores, so they can stock up on more cloud-supported titles. Of course, the Steam Summer Sale is the biggest promotion, which is kicking off later today. "Supported Steam games can be streamed across devices with GeForce NOW, making it easy to buy a game once, keep progress synced and pick up where the gameplay left off on PCs, Macs, handheld devices, phones, TVs and more," says the company. "In other words, the Steam Summer Sale brings the deals; GeForce NOW adds the flexibility." Don't forget that the GeForce NOW summer sale is still active as well. This limited-time offer drops the 12-month Performance membership from $99.99 to $64.99, saving members $35. At the same time, the 12-month Ultimate membership is currently going for $129.99, dropping the price by $70 from the original $199.99. Here are the games joining GeForce NOW's supported list this week: Dark Scrolls (New release on Steam, available June 22) SAND: Raiders of Sophie (New release on Steam, available June 22) Deer & Boy (New release on Steam, available June 23) EMPULSE (New release on Steam, available June 24) The Adventures of Elliot: The Millennium Tales (Steam) FATAL FURY: City of the Wolves (Steam) With the June expansions coming to an end, Nvidia should be announcing its July GeForce NOW plans next week. Keep in mind that, unlike subscription services like Game Pass or EA Play, a copy of a game must be owned by the GeForce NOW member (or at least have a license via PC Game Pass) to start playing via Nvidia's cloud servers. There is also a limit to how many hours subscribers can use the service per month.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!