• 0

Your favourite Antivirus?


  

2295 members have voted

  1. 1. Your favourite Antivirus?

    • Avast!
      193
    • AVG
      306
    • BitDefender
      42
    • Kaspersky
      261
    • McAfee
      154
    • NOD32
      633
    • Norton/Symantec
      435
    • Panda
      29
    • Trend Micro
      81
    • Other
      161


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

im always switching around ive used, norton (few versions) panda, avg, ZA secuirty suites AV and avast and so far ive found avg to be the best one, im keen to try this nod32 and kapersky

just out of curiosity is thier a firewall thread like this also? i have the same situation with firewalls

  • 0

interesting thread... probably one of the best on neowin just now ..

i'm about to change from norton 2003 ....

I saw Panda running well on a friend's pc and might try it ... anyone had bad experiences with Panda Titanium 2006 ?

Other than that, from reading the posts, I'm torn between AVG, Kapersky, & NOD32 ...

  • 0

i just got symantec antivirus corporate edition, we'll see how that goes.

Well, I've used Norton AV, Kaspersky, NOD32, AVG, and finally Symantec AV, and I would have to say my favorite out of all is Symantec. I'm talking about the Corporate edition... It's so nice on resources and so very out of the way... Me likes it very much :D

Throughout my IT career I have done a lot of testing of AV products. When I started consulting on my own I wanted an AV solution that I could sell to my clients that was highly effective yet simple enough for the average client to feel comfortable with. After sitting down and evaluating numerous products and having years of experience with others, I settled on Avast. Pricing is very competitive, the scanning engine is one of the best, they update both software and definitions religiously, and management is as simple as can be. Since I started recommending and installing Avast for my clients, I have replaced 3 Symantec Corporate installs with multiple servers and multiple clients on each. They were all fully updated, with both the latest software and virus definition updates, and more than half of the PCs on the networks of each of those three clients had numerous viruses that Symantec Corporate had been missing.

  • 0

Throughout my IT career I have done a lot of testing of AV products. When I started consulting on my own I wanted an AV solution that I could sell to my clients that was highly effective yet simple enough for the average client to feel comfortable with. After sitting down and evaluating numerous products and having years of experience with others, I settled on Avast. Pricing is very competitive, the scanning engine is one of the best, they update both software and definitions religiously, and management is as simple as can be. Since I started recommending and installing Avast for my clients, I have replaced 3 Symantec Corporate installs with multiple servers and multiple clients on each. They were all fully updated, with both the latest software and virus definition updates, and more than half of the PCs on the networks of each of those three clients had numerous viruses that Symantec Corporate had been missing.

Well, that's good to know. Even though I'm happy with SAV it's nice to see what other people say from their own experiences. I've been thinking about trying Avast, and it looks like you tipped me over the edge on it. I'm going to give it a try.

  • 0

Lol there's alot of FUD around here. First off Nod 32 does not have an unbeatable track record, unless you consider VB tests to be more important than real world, and it does not catch everything thrown at it.

The amount of processes that a program uses is unimportant, if you had 5 processes taking 4k each it would still be less for instance than one process taking up 21k of memory. Or what about cpu time?

Pop3 scanning is not a necessity so long as you have the active scanner going, there's no reason why an anti virus programs pop3 scanner should catch something your active scanner doesn't or vice versa.

That said Nod 32 is a pretty good AV. I still prefer McAfee's professional line although thier home version has gone down the drain, Norton and McAfee should both get props for having such good sales despite thier mediocre home versions.

  • 0

has anyone tried out Kaspersky 2006 ? (still in beta though) ..

I'd like to hear if anyone had good or bad experiences with it .. looks good though, and Kaspersky is a good antivirus ..

Wow, that looks really nice - a huge improvement over earlier versions. I always liked Kaspersky but I went with NOD32 because it made less of an impact upon my system. If they improve it's speed then I can't see a downside to it.

  • 0

I'm getting some good results with the Kaspersky 6 beta (although all I have to compare it against so-far is norton, and anything is faster than that !)

having said that, it has picked up some files that norton missed, and it's scanning engine seems good. mem usage sometimes goes crazy in the web antivirus mode though .. but it's still a beta .. I will stick with it for now & see what happens. Their forums make good reading for the beta tests ..

a friend installed nod32 on a 1.7centrino laptop with 1gb memory, etc .. it seemed to me to be running about the same speed in its scanning as kaspersky 6 beta

  • 0

Norton: Mediocre detection rate

McAffee: Gives you absolutely no clue about the state of its updates (date, version, etc.). Detection rate mediocre.

Kaspersky: Best detection rate there is, but VERY slow (at least in versions 5)

Panda: Very good detection rate and quite fast, but hooks deep into your system and might conflict with other low-level network software like firewalls.

  • 0

just looking at Antivir's website and it says the premiem edition has pop3 scanning, so the free one doesn't?

You are correct. I guess that's the one knock I have against it, but doesn't really give you less protection, it just means it isn't as proactive as an AV solution that is scanning your incoming POP3.

Basically, I have my Gmail account running through TB so my incoming email has already been scanned on Google's end of the deal. To take this a bit further, even if I was using my ISP's email, I'd have to download a virus and attempt to execute it in order to get infected, but ideally, AntiVir's scanner would catch it (with its higher detection rates than the other free solutions). I think common sense comes into play in this scenario as well, I always treat emails from people I don't recognize or with attachments with a healthy amount of suspicion. :shiftyninja:

What worries me, is that someone might choose something like AVG over AntiVir, because it offers POP3 scanning, even though its detection rates are a heck of alot lower. :)

I am now preparing myself to get flamed by our resident AV experts who may disagree with this philosophy! :p

  • 0

I like your key... :|

that screenie isn't of mine - I got that from Google images search :D :D

had to dump it for now though - when reading their forums (it's a beta, anyway) I noticed there were probs with avedesk, which I had too, along with some mail issues that I didn't even notice, so back to norton 2003 until it finishes it's beta or I decide on another to use.

Was going to use Panda titanium - but some neowinians have put me off it with tales of deadly destruction ... :rolleyes:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!