• 0

Your favourite Antivirus?


  

2295 members have voted

  1. 1. Your favourite Antivirus?

    • Avast!
      193
    • AVG
      306
    • BitDefender
      42
    • Kaspersky
      261
    • McAfee
      154
    • NOD32
      633
    • Norton/Symantec
      435
    • Panda
      29
    • Trend Micro
      81
    • Other
      161


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

People who have only used one AV shouldnt say theirs is the best because no one wont say their AV sucks. What im saying is this thread could go on forever, you'll never know which AV is the best.

I used about 4 AV's since i've had my pc and i would have to say NOD32 is my fave, mainly because of the low resources it uses.

  • 0

PCWorld magazine have just run a Anti-Virus test for the March 2006 edition of the magazine.

The results are almost perfect to what I've found myself (I've done my own testing as I install AV software on a lot of machines for clients), and at last BitDefender is at the top (a product I've used personally for a couple of years now).

http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/article/0,aid,124475,00.asp

Note: if you buy the pro version of BitDefender then you don't need Firewall & Spyware software because it does it all, so not only is it the slimest AV product for overheads, but it's a firewall and spyware killer too!

I call bull crap on this test...

Mainly because PCWorld is such a 'sponsored' magazine, plus these results don't line up with other more independent AV tests. I wonder what their method was for the testing. It is just hard to believe any test with Norton and McAfee in the top 10, and especially when NOD32 is not in it.

Although, it is good to see Antivir reigning over Avast and AVG...I have to agree with that one...

  • 0

I followed the Hype about NOD32 and i really like it, but what i want to use is a Security Suite, i am debating between Zone Alarm Internet Security, Norton Internet Security or Mcafee Internet Security.. please recommend me the best and if you guys know any other Security Suite, please let me know.

  • 0

I've been using NOD32 for about 8 months and I used the Neowin forums as part of my decision to buy. NOD32 is very good about updating their product. While I haven't really noticed as to their upgrade cycle, I'm almost certain it's daily. The definitions are currently dated Feb. 8th, 2006. I know the last couple of days they've been dated those days as well. Pretty much, I look for an AV program that I can just install and let it go (I even hide the icon in the taskbar). It does a great job on it's own, and only sometimes it'll require my attention if something bad comes up. It never let a virus through (from what I could tell) and every now and then I run online scanners just to double check. I'm not much for the Security Suites anymore. Coming from Norton (and even a few years before that, McAfee,) I don't really need a firewall because I have a hardware one (my router) and nothing beats a hardware firewall. Configuring a software firewall is hell, too. If anyone plays any games online they know exactly what I'm talking about. I don't need Anti-Spam software either, because I just use Microsoft's AntiSpyware which hasn't failed me yet. So really, those are the only two products I use to protect my computer and I've never to this day had any problems. Not to say NOD32 is the best. Kaspersky I know is pretty decent, I trialed it too around the time I was looking for a new AV product. Something made me go the way of NOD32, though.

  • 0

Antivirus? Personally I don't use any Antivirus, just common sense.

For my customers, I have recommended AVG and Mcafee Enterprise.

and people do use common sense alot of the time or atleast any non computer illiterate .. but as some say shheet happens.

  • 0

After years of using NAV Corporate (lighter memory footprint and way less bloat than the home version), I recently switched to NOD32 and am very pleased. Granted I can't tell anything truly substantive as I haven't been the victim of a virus in years (last I remember was 1995), but it feels much more response and updates more frequently.

  • 0

Question regarding NOD32. How good are they at updating when new viruses/worms/trojans come out? And how good is it's detection if the definitions aren't up-to-date yet?

One day my definitions got updated 3 times. Yes in ONE day.

NOD32 is without a doubt the best antivirus out there. Fast, small memory usage, detects viruses without remorse....

Go for it. You wont regret it. Ive been with Norton for quite sometime and used AVG for a while but there is absolutly nothing like NOD32...This is from my personal expirence.

  • 0

I'm using NOD32 which is brilliant, and YES!!! it does update at least 3 times a day.

Only thing at the moment though is NOD32 has detected some kind of AdWare as a threat, but won't remove it. Well...it doesn't give me the option to delete.

Here's the info:

D:\System Volume Information\_restore{AF0FDE4A-345F-4C5F-8F35-818A39267300}\RP87\A0020853.exe ?NSIS ?pxwma.dll - Win32/Adware.Webdir applicationb>

I even run Ad-Aware SE, but that doesn't detect it at all.

It doesn't seem to be affecting my PC, but if NOD32 is detecting and not removing it, I'm a little concerned about that.

  • 0

I voted for other because in my opinion Windows OneCare Live is the best one. It scans for viruses at a good speed without taking up your memory. Plus it has a built-in firewall (which you don't really need if you have XP SP2), and a tune-up feature to keep your PC running fast.

  • 0
I'm using NOD32 which is brilliant, and YES!!! it does update at least 3 times a day.

Only thing at the moment though is NOD32 has detected some kind of AdWare as a threat, but won't remove it. Well...it doesn't give me the option to delete.

Here's the info:

D:\System Volume Information\_restore{AF0FDE4A-345F-4C5F-8F35-818A39267300}\RP87\A0020853.exe ?NSIS ?pxwma.dll - Win32/Adware.Webdir applicationb>

I even run Ad-Aware SE, but that doesn't detect it at all.

It doesn't seem to be affecting my PC, but if NOD32 is detecting and not removing it, I'm a little concerned about that.

That's because you had the adware before, windows had a system restore point created, and then you removed the adware. Nod32 still detects it in system restore's cache which is locked and cannot be touched.

Fix: Delete old restore points using system restore.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!