Recommended Posts

F1 used to be fantastic, but its gone drastically down hill. Its not about the sport anymore its about how much money the FIA can make hence all the crap tracks now.

The new rules are quite honestly stupid:-

This whole idea of 1 lap qualifying, you dont do that in any other motor racing so why F1.

You cant change your tires... what is that all about!

And in my opinion Hockenhein was a brilliant track.

In my opinion F1 has gone from an enjoyable sport to a comercial oppertunity, just like alot of other motorsports, The rally for instance, i used to go to the rally when it started in chester and would do some proper stages like the welsh mountains and the classics up in scotland, it was enjoyable to watch. Now they have moved it all to the south and the stages are to be blunt rubbish, one of the most challanging rallys has become below average. Also when i started going when it was called "The Lombard Rally" it used to cost like ?2 to park and that was it, nothing to get on the stage, now it costs around ?10 to park and then about the same to get on the stage. Complete rip off. And now F1 is going down the same route, just spoiling something that was fine how it was! I just dont see the point!

Speed Channel shows all of the races that CBS doesn't show.? Speed Channel races are always live.

585995337[/snapback]

SpeedChannel is a Godsend but the only thing I don't like is they show an insane amount of NASCAR programming. I'm sure they can find something to show instead of "Michael Waltrip's Celebrity Poker".

Oh well, at least SC shows AMA and FIM racing.

Survey filled out and sent. F1 is fantastic, I really wish there was more exposure of it here in the USA.

The new rules are quite honestly stupid:-

This whole idea of 1 lap qualifying, you dont do that in any other motor racing so why F1.

You cant change your tires... what is that all about!

585995427[/snapback]

If everyone is on the same playing field why does it matter? How many laps do the need to qualify? Why do they need to keep changing their tires?

its not that they NEED to, its that they are simply not allowed unless an official says so, for safty for example. So all im say is why say you cant, i fail to see why that rule has been implemented, it just seams as though they have made it for no reason.

In general teams used to change once during the race. Now for the european grand prix that has just gone rikkonen could have won if he had changed his tires sometime during the race. Im not a supporter of Rikkonen but i felt quite sorry for him, doing all that work then that happening to him, just seams unfair.

As for "Everyone on the same field" thats not entirly true, as cars on the Bridgestones are at a disadvantage because the tires take longer to warm up than the Michelin's

Its not even close to the Senna, Prost, Mansell era.

The machines are part driven for the driver via electronic gismo's, safety is over the top and these dumb rules they keep bringing in, one engine, grooves in the tires etc.

The qualifying is a farce, i just don't enjoy it anymore.... and would any of the drivers apart from schumacher really cut it with the likes of Senna?

585994422[/snapback]

Senna, Mansell(My Hero) had more electronic help than they do now. Keeping tyres means driver ability needs to be better.

its not that they NEED to, its that they are simply not allowed unless an official says so, for safty for example. So all im say is why say you cant, i fail to see why that rule has been implemented, it just seams as though they have made it for no reason.

585995954[/snapback]

Brings teams that are not fully sponsored by tyre companies and cannot several sets a chance. It was part to close the field that everyone complained about before.

its not that they NEED to, its that they are simply not allowed unless an official says so, for safty for example. So all im say is why say you cant, i fail to see why that rule has been implemented, it just seams as though they have made it for no reason.

In general teams used to change once during the race. Now for the european grand prix that has just gone rikkonen could have won if he had changed his tires sometime during the race. Im not a supporter of Rikkonen but i felt quite sorry for him, doing all that work then that happening to him, just seams unfair.

585995954[/snapback]

They can change at anytime, they don't need permission. They just have to declare the tire at the end of the race unsafe and it needs to be approved.

The main reason I like the tire rule is the amount of money it saves. Tires can not be recycled or reused.

As for "Everyone on the same field" thats not entirly true, as cars on the Bridgestones are at a disadvantage because the tires take longer to warm up than the Michelin's.

585995954[/snapback]

Yes, that's true right now but that's not a problem with the qualifying, that's a problem with the tire manufacturer. They need to improve on their tire... or the teams need to change to Michelin.

I agree that it has gone downhill in the past 2-3 years greatly. MotoGP (Go Rossi!) is so much better at the moment, although F1 has picked up this year. They have made it fairer for the less 'well off' teams so teams like Ferrari can't keep winning race on race, year on year. I don't agree with the tire safety rule as it is forcing teams to push there tires further and make the sport 'less safe' (even though it is extremely safe) even though all there other rules are centred on safety. I just hope they continue to improve it.

Senna, Mansell(My Hero) had more electronic help than they do now. Keeping tyres means driver ability needs to be better.

585995974[/snapback]

I find that very hard to believe, look how far technolgy comes every year never mind 10+ since the glory F1 days.

The tyres are so advanced now, they can make them last as long as they need.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!