Recommended Posts

I downloaded both the

AutoPatcher_XP_Jun2005_Full.exe

AutoPatcher_XP_Jun2005_Lite.exe

in the last few days.

As for

AutoPatcher_XP_May2005_Lite.exe

I couldn't tell you when I downloaded this.

But I can tell you that I downloaded the

AutoPatcher_XP_Jan2005_Full.exe

on the second of FEB.

I downloaded both the

AutoPatcher_XP_Jun2005_Full.exe

AutoPatcher_XP_Jun2005_Lite.exe

in the last few days.

As for

AutoPatcher_XP_May2005_Lite.exe

I couldn't tell you when I downloaded this.

But I can tell you that I downloaded the

AutoPatcher_XP_Jan2005_Full.exe

on the second of FEB.

586122633[/snapback]

Have you deleted the target directory where AutoPatcher is installed? If not, locate the directory and delete it. Then "launch" AutoPatcher_XP_Jun2005_Full.exe and choose the destination.

If you still have the problem, you know to find us.

Are there an update version that contains only patches and programs added in june 2005?

It's may be useful for anyone how downloaded the may 2005 version and don't want to waste time for downloading its patches and programs again.

586125724[/snapback]

There is no update for the June Release available yet! If it will be available you can find it here...

AutoPatcher XP June 2005 , AutoPatcher for Windows XP SP2

Have you deleted the target directory where AutoPatcher is installed? If not, locate the directory and delete it. Then "launch" AutoPatcher_XP_Jun2005_Full.exe and choose the destination.

If you still have the problem, you know to find us.

586126195[/snapback]

yep did all that tried to download the FAQ

FAQ

Read the FAQ before installing AutoPatcher: v1.0 ap_enu.rtf ( 28.51k ) Number of downloads: 517

(made by raptor)

guide that doesn't work. Any help would be great. As this is the error I am getting.

Run-time error "438":

Object doesn't support this property or method.

Cheers

Masier

yep did all that tried to download the FAQ

FAQ

Read the FAQ before installing AutoPatcher: v1.0?  ap_enu.rtf ( 28.51k ) Number of downloads: 517

(made by raptor)

guide that doesn't work. Any help would be great. As this is the error I am getting.

Run-time error "438":

Object doesn't support this property or method.

Cheers

Masier

586126220[/snapback]

Have tried to match the MDCHECKSUM? Maybe you have a corrupted version.

Do you have Windows XP SP2 installed?

Do you administrative rights?

At what point you see the error? (Look in the window statusbar)

Hi I have downloaded the lite and the full as well both give the same error. I have checked the checksum. I have sp2 installed, i am using admin rights. The error occurs after the EUA after i select i agree hit next and it gives the error. I extract AP from the download file into a fresh folder.

I am using a AMD 64 3500+ at stock speeds

1 gig of ddr 400 at stock timings

Asus A8n-sli Lastest bios. and drivers from Nvidia 6.53

A 6600 nforce card

200 gig with 25% free

I am at a loss. I hope this helps.

Hi I have downloaded the lite and the full as well both give the same error. I have checked the checksum. I have sp2 installed, i am using admin rights. The error occurs after the EUA after i select i agree hit next and it gives the error. I extract AP from the download file into a fresh folder.

I am at a loss. I hope this helps.

586126301[/snapback]

I think that one option is left to do:

See a folder named "Win9xnt" under AutoPatcher? Try installing the Visual Basic 6.0 & Scripting Runtimes.

If all doesn't work, I have a feeling that your system isn't stable anymore, installed and deleted a lot of software? Added some spy and or adware?

Don't worry about your hardware!

Yep I think so too. I have tried the vb 6 and scripts didn't work. Just ran memtest did 30 odd loops no problem. Looks like a reinstall. Thanks for your help.

586126393[/snapback]

Help? It was without success.......

so, don't thank me.......

Help? It was without success.......

so, don't thank me.......

586126407[/snapback]

But everything thing that you suggested I had already done. I was hoping that I missed something. Are-well it's formating time.

Sounds like fun for you... :whistle: ;)

KB888656

KB892313

KB895181

Those three has been removed from Microsofts' download. Should I just delete te .amc files and folders for those files in my Norwegian release?

Anyways, I only need to translate the tweaks and test the files on an computer. Think it'll work out.

Oh, and I need help getting that .NET module made.

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...&DisplayLang=no

Click "Last ned" (right side of screen) to download.

for the .amc file

Title: Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1

Desc:

Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1 (SP1) har forbedret sikkerhet som hovedfokus. I tillegg inneholder oppdateringspakken samleoppdateringer for alle problemer som er rapportert av kunder etter utgivelsen av Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1. Legg spesielt merke til at SP1 gir bedre st?tte for ressurskrevende WSDL-dokumenter, datakj?ringsforhindring og beskyttelse mot sikkerhetsproblemer som for eksempel bufferoverl?p.

KB888656

KB892313

KB895181

Those three has been removed from Microsofts' download. Should I just delete te .amc files and folders for those files in my Norwegian release?

They are here:

KB888656

KB892313

KB895181

I don't use them in the Portuguese version, only in the English.

Oh, and I need help getting that .NET module made.

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...&DisplayLang=no

Click "Last ned" (right side of screen) to download.

for the .amc file

Title: Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1

What is the problem? Can't you download the file? Here is the direct link.

I have a problem with installing. After I install the files and run the Autopatcher, I get this dialog which you can see in the picture.

586091939[/snapback]

I had tha exact same problem, even on clean installs of Windows XP+SP2.

I figured out what happened. I had used the Module Editor to remove two of the categories (I think Add-Ons and Tweaks), but the folders reamine din the modules folders. When I ran autopatcher.exe, it gave that error message when it got to Power Toys (in the Add-On group).

I deleted the Add-ons and Tweaks folders and the issue goes away.

On a related note ... in previous version of Autopatcher, you could remove individual patches when using the Module Editor. Now it looks like you can only remove categories.

Am I doing something wrong?

Trouble with Norwegian chars!

We have three chars that the english alphabet don't have.

??? (???)

I've posted a pic with it.

Where i've circled red, it's a bug! It's only what's written in the "Name" field on the AMC files. Why? :-P

It looks like it's replaced with russian chars&:huh: :huh:

post-115773-1119986783.jpg

On a related note ... in previous version of Autopatcher, you could remove individual patches when using the Module Editor.  Now it looks like you can only remove categories.

Am I doing something wrong?

586133154[/snapback]

Nah - its possible to do so. Just move the module program into the subfolder.

The module program only works on modules in the same folder. Perhaps this could be fixed at a later date - but for now this works.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!