Recommended Posts

Now I'm 99% done!!! :D:D:D:D

Only a small bugtest + finereading left.

One annoying bug.. That _ALL_ the modules are unoficial! :(

Is it supposed to say that, or is there a fix?

586139795[/snapback]

You'll need to send it to one of the AP teammebers to get them officialised.

Now I'm 99% done!!! :D:D:D:D

Only a small bugtest + finereading left.

One annoying bug.. That _ALL_ the modules are unoficial! :(

Is it supposed to say that, or is there a fix?

586139795[/snapback]

So, you fixed your problems with the Framework modules?

Tried to install June '05 AP onto a friends XP pro SP2, and got this error.

Module panic!

Major F***UP!

This release is not suitable for your system.

35602: Key is not unique in collection.

I said she's using a dodgy install but she says no, and says legit, it's a corporate version.

Anyone enlighten me on the 35602 ?

Corteoz, let us know when you're ready!

42n81, first, what language is that Operating System? AutoPatcher should say something like "Operating System: Windows XP Professional SP2 (1032)". Which version of AutoPatcher did you use (Lite, Full, Update)? Have you ever used AP on that system before?

/Raptor

42n81, first, what language is that Operating System? AutoPatcher should say something like "Operating System: Windows XP Professional SP2 (1032)". Which version of AutoPatcher did you use (Lite, Full, Update)? Have you ever used AP on that system before?

/Raptor

586143132[/snapback]

Thanks for your reply.

The OS is in English and AP says "Operating System: Windows XP Professional SP2 (1033)".

I used the Full version (June), and it is a fairly fresh rebuild which has not had AP installed on it previously.

I started AP just now to check the OS version number following your query, and

it gave me this message which I have not previously seen -

35613: Imagelist must be initialised before it can be used

I was running some other programs at the time, (this time), but I just started AP so as to get that number.

Try installing the VB Runtimes

586143647[/snapback]

Thanks.

Did you try installing the two files in the \win9xnt folder under AutoPatcher?

586143670[/snapback]

Thank you, I hadn't, but now after having done so, the problem unfortunately remains. I am getting the same error message 35602.

Thanks.

Thank you, I hadn't, but now after having done so, the problem unfortunately remains. I am getting the same error message 35602.

586145476[/snapback]

After the installation of the VB Runtimes files located in \win9xnt folder under AutoPatcher. Did you restarted your system before the installation of AutoPatcher?

After the installation of the VB Runtimes files located in \win9xnt folder under AutoPatcher. Did you restarted your system before the installation of AutoPatcher?

586146757[/snapback]

Yes, I have tried that as well as disabling antivirus etc.

I have installed autopatcher on many systems in the past without problem, but this one has me vexed.

Thanks for taking the time to respond, though.

Yes, I have tried that as well as disabling antivirus etc.

I have installed autopatcher on many systems in the past without problem, but this one has me vexed.

Thanks for taking the time to respond, though.

586147722[/snapback]

Can you make a screendump and post it here?

Sure!

586152006[/snapback]

I've checked the content of the modules. These are all okay, all the values are set correctly.

I think that you have a corrupted version. Try to download it again, use an other source for downloading. Or tell where you downloaded it. Then I'll download it here and test it. It's up to you ;)

I've checked the content of the modules. These are all okay, all the values are set correctly.

I think that you have a corrupted version. Try to download it again, use an other source for downloading. Or tell where you downloaded it. Then I'll download it here and test it. It's up to you  ;)

586152056[/snapback]

You're most kind.

I downloaded from page 1 of this forum topic.

According to my memory, (at times unreliable), I went for the first option, the Autopatcher torrent tracker.

I don't know whether there is any file verification available for these downloads.

I will download from one of the mirrors and try installing again.

I certainly don't expect you to go to any great efforts on my behalf, but I am very grateful for your offer and for the help and advice you have given me so far.

I'll let you know whether my next attempt has been successful or not.

:)

You're most kind.

I downloaded from page 1 of this forum topic.

According to my memory, (at times unreliable), I went for the first option, the Autopatcher torrent tracker.

I don't know whether there is any file verification available for these downloads.

I will download from one of the mirrors and try installing again.

I certainly don't expect you to go to any great efforts on my behalf, but I am very grateful for your offer and for the help and advice you have given me so far.

I'll let you know whether my next attempt has been successful or not.

:)

586155294[/snapback]

Thanks, it?s my pleasure when I can support people when the problems or questions.

If you want to use a P2P program that will verify the download, use this program ?Lime Wire?. It works very good, every BIT will be verified after the download, shown in the users interface.

You were right !!

I downloaded a fresh copy from another source and all went smoothly.

I really appreciate your generosity.

                                                    36_1_21.gif

586160530[/snapback]

We must thank you for using AutoPatcher and post your problem here at the forum instead of deleting AutoPatcher and don't use it anymore!

So, thank you! :D

How can the free AutoPatcher be such a professional piece of software, both in the smoothness and solid reliability of its function, the simplicity, intuitiveness and ease of operation, and the stylishly simple beauty of its visual design, when so much expensive commercial software is halfway to gaudy rubbish?

All those associated with it should feel proud. They are greatly appreciated and admired.

How can the free AutoPatcher be such a professional piece of software, both in the smoothness and solid reliability of its function, the simplicity, intuitiveness and ease of operation, and the stylishly simple beauty of its visual design, when so much expensive commercial software is halfway to gaudy rubbish?

All those associated with it should feel proud. They are greatly appreciated and admired.

586165283[/snapback]

That's the secret of the chef and his slaves :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • At work we still have a couple of people that use a version of AutoCAD LT purchased in 1994. This predates Windows 95 and works fine on versions of Windows up to XP. Its long since run in an locked down isolated XP VM, accessible via RDP. I did install LibreCAD for them, however they said it was just too different to get to grips with. In all fairness one of them is now 75 and the other is almost 60.
    • On my music making (non internet) PC Sony Acid Pro 7.0 Adobe Audition 2015 Korg Legacy Collection Windows 7 SP1
    • Anyway to download these versions without being on the Experimental builds?
    • Nothing is stopping you from continuing with your testing cadence. If updates are released every 2 weeks instead of 4, and you test once every 4 weeks, the exact same amount of patches will still be available for you in those 4 weeks. For example: Before 4th week - patch 1, 2, 3, 4 After 2nd week - patch 1 and 2 4th week - patch 3 and 4 Still the same amount after 4.
    • Everyone else has said it. I'm gonna say it - you don't know what you're talking about. I do. I have two laptops. One work, one personal. I have access to two more laptops - both personal. At home I manually update my personal laptop when I see on Neowin that there is an update - I carry on and only apply the updates when I am ready. My work one only updates when my workplace decides to send it - I carry on and only apply the updates (when they actually arrive, which is usually days after the release) when I switch off the laptop at the end of the day as usual. The two other personal laptops only get updated when I get to it which is rarely - the people who own them carry on using them until I get to it and update them. All of the browsers on all laptops are configured to restore the tabs when launched. Google and Microsoft have changed from 6 weeks to 4, and it looks like it's going to move to 2. None of these changes affect how any of these browsers on the laptops are used. Not one jot. My advice to you is stop panicking whenever you see an update. Just carry on with what you're doing. This even benefits you in a way - from your comment you sound like you don't like the changes or the frivolous new features - great - then carry on as before!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!