Recommended Posts

Now I'm 99% done!!! :D:D:D:D

Only a small bugtest + finereading left.

One annoying bug.. That _ALL_ the modules are unoficial! :(

Is it supposed to say that, or is there a fix?

586139795[/snapback]

You'll need to send it to one of the AP teammebers to get them officialised.

Now I'm 99% done!!! :D:D:D:D

Only a small bugtest + finereading left.

One annoying bug.. That _ALL_ the modules are unoficial! :(

Is it supposed to say that, or is there a fix?

586139795[/snapback]

So, you fixed your problems with the Framework modules?

Tried to install June '05 AP onto a friends XP pro SP2, and got this error.

Module panic!

Major F***UP!

This release is not suitable for your system.

35602: Key is not unique in collection.

I said she's using a dodgy install but she says no, and says legit, it's a corporate version.

Anyone enlighten me on the 35602 ?

Corteoz, let us know when you're ready!

42n81, first, what language is that Operating System? AutoPatcher should say something like "Operating System: Windows XP Professional SP2 (1032)". Which version of AutoPatcher did you use (Lite, Full, Update)? Have you ever used AP on that system before?

/Raptor

42n81, first, what language is that Operating System? AutoPatcher should say something like "Operating System: Windows XP Professional SP2 (1032)". Which version of AutoPatcher did you use (Lite, Full, Update)? Have you ever used AP on that system before?

/Raptor

586143132[/snapback]

Thanks for your reply.

The OS is in English and AP says "Operating System: Windows XP Professional SP2 (1033)".

I used the Full version (June), and it is a fairly fresh rebuild which has not had AP installed on it previously.

I started AP just now to check the OS version number following your query, and

it gave me this message which I have not previously seen -

35613: Imagelist must be initialised before it can be used

I was running some other programs at the time, (this time), but I just started AP so as to get that number.

Try installing the VB Runtimes

586143647[/snapback]

Thanks.

Did you try installing the two files in the \win9xnt folder under AutoPatcher?

586143670[/snapback]

Thank you, I hadn't, but now after having done so, the problem unfortunately remains. I am getting the same error message 35602.

Thanks.

Thank you, I hadn't, but now after having done so, the problem unfortunately remains. I am getting the same error message 35602.

586145476[/snapback]

After the installation of the VB Runtimes files located in \win9xnt folder under AutoPatcher. Did you restarted your system before the installation of AutoPatcher?

After the installation of the VB Runtimes files located in \win9xnt folder under AutoPatcher. Did you restarted your system before the installation of AutoPatcher?

586146757[/snapback]

Yes, I have tried that as well as disabling antivirus etc.

I have installed autopatcher on many systems in the past without problem, but this one has me vexed.

Thanks for taking the time to respond, though.

Yes, I have tried that as well as disabling antivirus etc.

I have installed autopatcher on many systems in the past without problem, but this one has me vexed.

Thanks for taking the time to respond, though.

586147722[/snapback]

Can you make a screendump and post it here?

Sure!

586152006[/snapback]

I've checked the content of the modules. These are all okay, all the values are set correctly.

I think that you have a corrupted version. Try to download it again, use an other source for downloading. Or tell where you downloaded it. Then I'll download it here and test it. It's up to you ;)

I've checked the content of the modules. These are all okay, all the values are set correctly.

I think that you have a corrupted version. Try to download it again, use an other source for downloading. Or tell where you downloaded it. Then I'll download it here and test it. It's up to you  ;)

586152056[/snapback]

You're most kind.

I downloaded from page 1 of this forum topic.

According to my memory, (at times unreliable), I went for the first option, the Autopatcher torrent tracker.

I don't know whether there is any file verification available for these downloads.

I will download from one of the mirrors and try installing again.

I certainly don't expect you to go to any great efforts on my behalf, but I am very grateful for your offer and for the help and advice you have given me so far.

I'll let you know whether my next attempt has been successful or not.

:)

You're most kind.

I downloaded from page 1 of this forum topic.

According to my memory, (at times unreliable), I went for the first option, the Autopatcher torrent tracker.

I don't know whether there is any file verification available for these downloads.

I will download from one of the mirrors and try installing again.

I certainly don't expect you to go to any great efforts on my behalf, but I am very grateful for your offer and for the help and advice you have given me so far.

I'll let you know whether my next attempt has been successful or not.

:)

586155294[/snapback]

Thanks, it?s my pleasure when I can support people when the problems or questions.

If you want to use a P2P program that will verify the download, use this program ?Lime Wire?. It works very good, every BIT will be verified after the download, shown in the users interface.

You were right !!

I downloaded a fresh copy from another source and all went smoothly.

I really appreciate your generosity.

                                                    36_1_21.gif

586160530[/snapback]

We must thank you for using AutoPatcher and post your problem here at the forum instead of deleting AutoPatcher and don't use it anymore!

So, thank you! :D

How can the free AutoPatcher be such a professional piece of software, both in the smoothness and solid reliability of its function, the simplicity, intuitiveness and ease of operation, and the stylishly simple beauty of its visual design, when so much expensive commercial software is halfway to gaudy rubbish?

All those associated with it should feel proud. They are greatly appreciated and admired.

How can the free AutoPatcher be such a professional piece of software, both in the smoothness and solid reliability of its function, the simplicity, intuitiveness and ease of operation, and the stylishly simple beauty of its visual design, when so much expensive commercial software is halfway to gaudy rubbish?

All those associated with it should feel proud. They are greatly appreciated and admired.

586165283[/snapback]

That's the secret of the chef and his slaves :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
    • Another devilish issue surrounding these certificates is what can happen with old, unsuspecting PCs that nevertheless have Secure Boot enabled. In my case, it was a Dell with a 3rd-gen Core chip (so about 13 years old). As of the last few weeks, it was suddenly BSOD'g within about 5 minutes of booting. Turns out it was because of MS's "Secure-Boot-Update" scheduled task, which is scheduled to run 5 minutes after login. It's explained in gory detail here (this is not my post, but it was where I found the answer), but the short version is that this legacy system would need fairly elaborate, manual certificate intervention since MS's automatic cert update method cannot work. How to do that is linked late in the thread. https://www.bleepingcomputer.c...od-caused-by-scheduled-task Secure Boot wasn't at all important for this particular PC, so I disabled it to be done with the problem.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      95
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!