Recommended Posts

Copied form : http://www.gamespot.com/features/6128136/p-18.html

Dear Fanboys,

I have a few pieces of advice I want to pass onto you in this GameSpotting. I know that in an age of multiple platforms and a huge amount of games, it can be difficult to remain loyal to one platform or one company. It's a real challenge, and you are all noble and courageous for taking on this quest. I have a few suggestions that I hope you all take to heart. It will help guide you down the path of the fanboy.

GameSpot is the most reliable source for reviews. Except when another publication rates the game you're hyping higher than us. Then that publication is the most reliable source. Until next week, anyway.

A person who owns just one console is inherently less biased than editors at GameSpot who have access to all consoles.

The term "exclusive" is tricky. Its definition changes depending upon whether a hot game appears on your platform or not.

Innovation is what it's called when your console has a unique feature. Otherwise, it's called a gimmick.

Your specific needs are shaped around your platform's features. For instance, if your console doesn't feature HDTV support, then it really wasn't that necessary to have, anyway.

A game that is scored less than a 9.5 on any platform you don't own is called a flop. If it does achieve that score, it's called overrated. (According to the GameSpot rating system, a game rated 8 or above is "great," but we all know that it really means "flop.")

Sales numbers are everything, as long as the numbers are best for your favorite company or console. If that means you have to dig up numbers for sales in New Zealand stores from seven months ago to prove your point, so be it.

Likewise, it is up to you to monitor how companies are doing and report every dip in stock price of manufacturers of other consoles. You're all experts in the fields of economics and finance, so your analyses will always prove correct.

You must realize, that some companies are evil, and some are inherently good. Some companies do it for the money, others do it... so, well, you can brag about them.

Perhaps the most clever thing you as fanboys can do is to come up with derogatory names for competing consoles, such as Xbrick instead of Xbox or FlopStation 2 instead of PlayStation 2.

On message boards, the best way to convey your point is to write in all caps, ignore the rules of grammar, and include lots of "LMAO's" and "LOLs" in your post.

It makes perfect sense to insult a company's lineup one moment and at the same time hope that company will go third party and develop for your console the next.

Playing a game on a different console for ten minutes at a friend's house qualifies you as an expert on that game and console.

You are obviously the most knowledgeable person about hardware. So when you're talking about the difference between CISC and RISC processors, everyone should stop and listen.

A sequel on another console is a "rehash," while a sequel on your console is not; in fact, it's highly anticipated.

Your platform is the best one in existence. Any time you see what might be evidence to the contrary, it's clearly because others are blinded by their idiotic fanboyism.

So you see, dear readers, the best part about being a fanboy is that you can never be proven wrong. As long as you ignore the rules of logic and sensibility, you will never have to worry about whether or not you made a good investment. That sure helps all the insecurity go away, doesn't it?

In the meanwhile, the rest of us will have to go on using our brains to make decisions when it comes to videogames. We will have to actually think about whether or not it's worth it to buy a console based on our needs. We will have to consider forking over more money for a new machine if its games are excellent. We will have to play the best games instead of bash them if they're not on our consoles.

In other words, the rest of us non-fanboys are doomed to a life of playing the best games and enjoying our hobby, while you will have the luxury of being able to ignore the majority of games that come out, because they're not on your console. That is indeed very lucky for you all.

And with that, I must wrap up my letter today. I hope I was able to teach you all a thing or two.

Your Pal,

Adam

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :ninja: :ninja: :ninja: :ninja:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/337522-open-letter-to-fanboys/
Share on other sites

I wrote an article like this about browser fanboyism, namely Firefox fanboys. I'm glad people are continuing the fight against blind favoritism and the inability to see something from more than one side.

586129545[/snapback]

fanboyism is getting out of control... like a company can make you so angry from people saying "that system sucks" and make you want to lash back...

all they really need to say is "thats your opinion, and my opinion is blah blah blah".

i see it all the time on here, and i don't fanboy any software, hardware, or anything else. i like both AMD and Intel. i like Xbox, Playstation, and Nintendo. i like Windows and Mac (altho i use windows, and said some dumb things in the passed)

but in the end, i only pick what is gonna give me what i need, eg, performance, appearance, and the best overall experience. i don't fanboy anything, i choose wisely

what exactly is a fanboy?

586129695[/snapback]

exactly as it says...

take Xbox 360 and Playstation 3 for example. people have liked and loved playstation for years, and here comes along the xbox. new and the best system out on the market, and it proves to be the best performer. fanboys will disown this piece of information, and keep worshiping there playstation / nintendo.

same with xbox 360 and playstation 3. the stats are NOT final, and as of right now, xbox 360 appears to be the better performer, and already in production of games, etc...

fanboys will not even think twice of xbox 360, and stick with there playstation.. because of the name. hope that answers your question.

What always get's me chuckling is that IMO being a fanboy is exactly like working for a boss that never bothers to learn your name, yet you are still willing to be a "team" player.

exactly as it says...

take Xbox 360 and Playstation 3 for example.  people have liked and loved playstation for years, and here comes along the xbox.  new and the best system out on the market, and it proves to be the best performer.  fanboys will disown this piece of information, and keep worshiping there playstation / nintendo.

same with xbox 360 and playstation 3.  the stats are NOT final, and as of right now, xbox 360 appears to be the better performer, and already in production of games, etc...

fanboys will not even think twice of xbox 360, and stick with there playstation.. because of the name.  hope that answers your question.

586129709[/snapback]

you realise that your post was also biased? people don't just care about the specs.

GameSpot is the most reliable source for reviews. Except when another publication rates the game you're hyping higher than us. Then that publication is the most reliable source. Until next week, anyway

Great article, but i dont think Gamespot reviews are that reliable. Am i a fanboy?:x

Every time I think of Fanboys I think of this wonderful comic  :D  :D

586129832[/snapback]

^ LMAO. Great comic!

He nailed it right on the spot. This kinda reminds me of how I felt back in November 2004 (and the hype around the Xbox game that came out then). The fans call it 'anticipated.' Everyone else just called it '1.5' or a rehash.

Great article, but i dont think Gamespot reviews are that reliable. Am i a fanboy?

586129832[/snapback]

Of course not. This scenario comes to mind:

"IGN gave XXXXXX 9.9. But Gamespot sucks ass, they gave it 9.1."

For the aforementioned game, this happened numerous times. Just because it was given a 9.4 people that I knew bitched about that, while other sites gave it a near perfect score. My response: SO WHAT?!

exactly as it says...

take Xbox 360 and Playstation 3 for example.  people have liked and loved playstation for years, and here comes along the xbox.  new and the best system out on the market, and it proves to be the best performer.  fanboys will disown this piece of information, and keep worshiping there playstation / nintendo.

same with xbox 360 and playstation 3.  the stats are NOT final, and as of right now, xbox 360 appears to be the better performer, and already in production of games, etc...

fanboys will not even think twice of xbox 360, and stick with there playstation.. because of the name.  hope that answers your question.

586129709[/snapback]

Here's a nice example of a fanboy not even realizing he's being a fanboy. :whistle:

Common sense.. this isn't really news. You just have to expieriment with different software and see which one(s) you like best, rather than going by what people say or review.

586129688[/snapback]

Well, like my mom says, "common sense is the least common of all senses". I personally think there is nothing wrong with favoring one console or brand if you truly are convinced that that particular company is the one that fits your particular needs, given that you've tried the others, and as long as you are aware that that's your opinion and you have to respect other people's.

Here's a nice example of a fanboy not even realizing he's being a fanboy.  :whistle:

586130609[/snapback]

I don't agree - all that was said was definition of fanboy - support whatever platform they have to the detriment of all other options.

People should buy the console that has the best specification together with the best line up of games. I haven't followed much of the console was but from what I've read the X-box spec is more well known n and has a line up of games. This is compared to a PS which is not yet finalised and fewer games announced.

I could however have interpreted his comments incorrectly :p

and before anyone says say - No - i'm not a fanboy - I don't even own a console and never have

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      558
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!