'My Ferrari's too slow'


Recommended Posts

A businessman who bought a brand new Ferrari is demanding his money back because it only goes 280 km/h.

Berlin businessman Joerg Winterberg, 60, is unhappy his ?111 000 (about R 1.3m) Ferrari Challenge Stradale didn't reach the advertised 298km.

He said: "I could have bought a Porsche for far less and still had the same performance. I want my money back.

"The prospectus promised the car could reach 298 km/h, but in reality it can only go up to 280 km/h."

Ferrari have denied there is anything wrong with the car and have refused to give the businessman his money back.

He is now taking the company to court after an independent expert also found the sports car could not go at the speeds promised.

German motorists can travel at whatever speed they like on the country's famous autobahns. - Ananova.com

20050628144855ChallengeStradale.jpg

:||

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/338411-my-ferraris-too-slow/
Share on other sites

Well if its new... The engine will probably need running in... you don't buy a Brand new car at delivery milage and thrash the crap out of it expecting the claimed performance.

Maybe after its done xxxx Miles and run in and still not reaching claimed figures, then yes id be pretty annoyed if its not doing what its suppose to be doing for the price I paid.

Well if its new... The engine will probably need running in... you don't buy a Brand new car at delivery milage and thrash the crap out of it expecting the claimed performance.

Maybe after its done xxxx Miles and run in and still not reaching claimed figures, then yes id be pretty annoyed if its not doing what its suppose to be doing for the price I paid.

586140026[/snapback]

This is entirely correct. The break-in procedure on our Gallardo was less meticulous than what dealer mechanic described, but it still involved sustained speed driving for long distances with erratic braking patterns and extreme up/down shifts. After ~2500 miles, you can easily notice a huge difference in performance and even mileage (the thing utterly sucked gas at the beginning - I could barely get the 9mpg city mileage in 90-95% highway driving). So, yes, this is just silly.

This is entirely correct. The break-in procedure on our Gallardo was less meticulous than what dealer mechanic described, but it still involved sustained speed driving for long distances with erratic braking patterns and extreme up/down shifts. After ~2500 miles, you can easily notice a huge difference in performance and even mileage (the thing utterly sucked gas at the beginning - I could barely get the 9mpg city mileage in 90-95% highway driving). So, yes, this is just silly.

586140058[/snapback]

i thought those cars already came broken in out of the factory? :huh:

it doesn't really make sense to buy a $100,000+ car that does like 180mph, and then be like "ok, drive safe, don't go over 45mph!"

i mean, when you buy a car like that, you're gonna want to drive it right away. thats why i thought everything was run in before hand.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Turbo Pascal was my first real programming experience more than 30 years ago at university. I mostly taught myself from the included examples and help documentation, because the university only taught the basic syntax and philosophy of Pascal, without going deeply into Turbo Pascal’s advanced features. I still remember when I discovered that I could embed assembly language directly into Pascal code, call BIOS functions, manipulate screen memory, use mouse interrupts, and control peripherals from my programs. That opened huge doors for me. Programming back then felt really fun, direct, and close to the machine. What I loved about Pascal was its readability and the almost instant compile time. Turbo Pascal was an amazing environment, but unfortunately Turbo Pascal for Windows 3 did not feel like it fully carried that legacy forward. Later, Delphi got things back on the right track after the messy transition to TP for Windows. Sadly, Delphi suffered from years of uncertainty as it moved from Borland to CodeGear and then to Embarcadero. That instability made many developers lose confidence in it, even though Delphi itself remained a powerful and productive tool. I still work with Delphi from time to time, but I definitely miss the old days of Turbo Pascal.
    • I hope this encodes in to AV1 or AV2 as currently tiktok uses h265 and h264.
    • Qualcomm reportedly in talks to build custom video chips for TikTok parent ByteDance by Karthik Mudaliar Qualcomm is reportedly in advanced discussions to provide custom chip-design services to Chinese tech giant ByteDance, the same company behind TikTok. According to a report from Reuters, Qualcomm could be involved in designing custom silicon tailored for ByteDance's massive data-center workloads. If it goes through, the deal would make ByteDance one of Qualcomm's early anchor customers for its fastly growing custom chip-design division, For years, Qualcomm was the king of making smartphone processors and modems. The company has also been moving into the PC ecosystem and other formats such as on-device AI for Android XR headsets. However, this particular deal is about Qualcomm's custom Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). For a platform like TikTok, ByteDance needs hardware that can help it ingest, process, and serve billions of short-form videos daily. Generalised hardware is no longer the most cost-effective and efficient route, which is why ByteDance is trying to develop custom Video Processing Units (VPUs). VPUs designed specifically for ByteDance’s algorithmic needs could drastically reduce data-center power consumption and improve encoding speeds at an unprecedented scale. The underlying tech behind these processors is actually from Qualcomm's recent acquisition of AlphaWave Semi, a high-speed connectivity specialist company. By combining AlphaWave’s high-bandwidth IP with Qualcomm’s architectural expertise, the company could begin mass production by the end of 2026, if the talks go through. All this also comes at a time when U.S.-China tech relations have dwindled. Escalating trade frictions between Washington and Beijing have severely impacted the export of high-end AI chips from U.S. firms like Nvidia, AMD, and Lam Research. Yet, the Qualcomm-ByteDance discussions show that U.S. tech companies are still actively seeking growth avenues and are open to doing business with China, where regulators still permit. Reuters notes that the outcome of this deal could be uncertain, and ByteDance might also seek partners other than Qualcomm. via Reuters | Image via DepositPhotos.com
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Almohandis earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      456
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      117
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Xenon
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!