Reasons to switch


Recommended Posts

Originally posted by Vidar

So, let's drop the hardware debate. Btw, Wicked. Klipch will always beat the Logitech. The cheapest I've seen retail klipsche was around $400 for a 4.1 THX (which THX merely means 'It sounds good playing StarWars).

I already know klipsch will always beat logitech. xweston was the one quoting a system with logitech speakers

Originally posted by Dazzla

Througout the 2 months I've been using OS X, I can glady say I have no idea what a Kernal panic looks like. OS X has never forced me to restart because of a crash and I've never lost any work due to a crash. In fact the only time OS X has crashed on me as when I was playing around with system files I shouldn't be touching and I messed it up. :D

That dll hacking feeling doesn't go away just cause I've got a mac ;)

Wait a second... First you say your OS X has never crashed, then you say has, becuse you were playing with system files. You lost all your credability on this one. It really crashes on you all the time, at least once a day, like everyone elses OS X.

Originally posted by Night Prowler

Wait a second... First you say your OS X has never crashed, then you say has, becuse you were playing with system files. You lost all your credability on this one.

Right, let me clarify. It didn't crash. It has never crashed on me. I deleted a vital system file and i couldn't boot. That isn't crashing.

Originally posted by Night Prowler

It really crashes on you all the time, at least once a day, like everyone elses OS X.

Riiiight, I take it you've never used OS X then. I can glady say I've never had a crash. You have to take into account I've only been using OS X for 2 months.

XP only crashed on me majorly about three times ever since I was using it back in April 2001. It's not that weird for it not to crash, maybe you're judging it on personal experience of XP :rolleyes:

I can comfortably say that OS X doesn't crash, although I don't own an iMAC i have played about and used many in the past. My friend has one of the new iMACs and its amazing, he has never had it crash. I think their interface is much better than windows just a shame its not as widely used :(

Originally posted by deadzombie

I'd like to offer my humble opinion here; Mac OSX Aqua GUI is a better interface by default. However from what I've seen WinXP can be modified in every way that OSX can be.

Am I wrong here?

You're not, partly :cheeky:

Although I've seen themes for both, i.e. milk they can look similar in a static screenshot, but you'll never get the feel of OS X on a Windows machine and vice versa. The way I work on the two is different, you have to play to their advantages.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
    • It's funny when thieves accuse other thieves of stealing. Ai companies just blatantly siphoned all the knowledge of the internet without consent and are now selling it with their service... so excuse me if I find this a bit ironic.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!