• 0

What is Windows written in

Asked by gamehack,

 Share

Question

55 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Veteran

trance

Posted
Posted

What "source" would be adequate for you gamehack? Do you want a quote from Bill Gates saying what the OS is written in? Why not think for a second and extrapolate...

3 main languages out there, C, C++ and ASM... what else do you honestly expect an OS to be written in?

Christ almighty there are some stupid assed people in the world.

  • 0
Grand Master

_I am Reptar

Posted
Posted
That doesn't prove your point, so I can equally assume it's not true since you have no proof that it is not true ;)

586265551[/snapback]

What ****ing point, my first time posting here idiot.

I was just saying get the code(if you can) and check for yourselves instead of asking.

  • 0
Veteran

d3nuo

Posted
Posted
That doesn't prove your point, so I can equally assume it's not true since you have no proof that it is not true ;)

586265551[/snapback]

that's the most retarded thing i've heard all week. the only "point" he has would be "proven" if you did what he said, and look at what the source for Win2000 is. think before you type!!

  • 0
Community Regular

Simplicity

Posted
Posted
i like the way you think and no you cant have a cockslap :p

586265677[/snapback]

What do u mean u like the way i think? I heard at first microsoft saying Vista would be written in 100% .net atmosphere, but they have backed off that a bit in the last months, What will it be written in?

  • 0
Community Regular

GAM

Posted
Posted

I've worked with parts of the source-code for Windows NT a couple of years ago (my employer was a close partner with Microsoft and had full access to the OS source code), and it was mostly in C. However, there are assembly and C++ code too. Heh, even batch (.bat/.cmd) files.

It doesn't really matter much what it is written in, since it is not public anyway --it is a black box and should be treated as such (really, you don't want to know the details inside, it is scary....).

  • 0
Grand Master

Veedems Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
What do u mean u like the way i think? I heard at first microsoft saying Vista would be written in 100% .net atmosphere, but they have backed off that a bit in the last months, What will it be written in?

586265690[/snapback]

The core will still be in c, c++, and assembly, however, certain system components have been said to be created using .net.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to question listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • I restored the default settings to Secure Boot. Big mistake

      By +Warwagon · Posted

      In the boot options in the UEFI is set to legacy or CMS? It needs to be set to UEFI if it's not already.
    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors

      By Ccl Ncc · Posted

      Does sound like Microsoft
    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors

      By Co-ords · Posted

      That made me laugh! Thank you
    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors

      By Karthik Mudaliar · Posted

      Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • OpenAI and Broadcom unveil Jalapeño, a new AI chip built for LLM inference

      By margrave · Posted

      Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      466
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!