DMCA regulations


Recommended Posts

If people love the show then they shouldnt download it and show support for the creators by buying it when it comes out, forget that whimpy "im only previewing it before i buy it" crap. Preview it if they release video clips on the website.

586271551[/snapback]

Correction. They may download it siince they are buying it.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/349660-dmca-regulations/
Share on other sites

Incorrect. Even owning a legal copy of the disc does not grant one permission to obtain it, also, via illegal means.

586271667[/snapback]

Are you implying that using Bittorrent is illegal? It isn't illegal at all. If I own a copy of the disc I fail to see how downloading it equates to obtaining it illegally

Owning a license to watch a movie also allows you the opporunity to back it up (without violating any laws/agreements). Downloading it is the only method those without the required hardware to back-up can obtain a back up.

Just because you own a DVD doesn't mean you can walk into a store and steal a 2nd copy.

586271673[/snapback]

Woah! That's totally out of context. Downloading (does not equal) stealing...

You purchase a license to view a movie when 'purchasing a movie'. That license is completely valid regardless of the source of media (a physcial DVD vs data digitally stored on pcs).

If I own it, I can download it.[/size]

Edited by joekr

so i can make copies for myself legally....can rip it for personal use on my own computer legally...but if i own it and don't want to go through the trouble of ripping it i can't download it and have the exact same files i would have if i ripeed it myself....

how does that make any sense?

Just because you own a DVD doesn't mean you can walk into a store and steal a 2nd copy.

586271673[/snapback]

Completely different thing. If you walk into the store and take a copy, you are depriving that store from selling said copy. By downloading it, you are dowloading a digital copy so no property is lost. When you buy a DVD, you are buying the media it is on and a licence to use the content on it. Since you already have a license to use the content on the DVD, there is nothing wrong with downloading it for storage on your PC IMO (and yes, I know it's technically illegal to do so but really, who cares? No one is losing ANYTHING and the company got thier money from you).

Nothing wrong (at least morally, in my opinion) with downloading for previewing purposes. It's not like this movie took tons of money and work to make anyway, unlike some movies in theaters (100+ million). Anyway, if I download something and it's not good, then I'm very happy not to have payed for it. If it is good enough, I will purchase it.

Technically it's illegal to download as it's not even been released onto the shelves YET therefor obtaining it via Bittorrent or P2P networks means it's illegal.

If you don't think so then that's upto yourself and those wanting to download it, but I think people should respect the rules of the site and not discuss certain issues based on warez.

If you're downloading it then do so but you know don't make a meal out of something. I think it's sad it's gotten out, But still there'll be many people who'll buy it just because they love the show.

BTW I'm not a Family Guy fan but... BUT! I would like to see this movie, it may sway me, anything is worth a watch! :yes:

Incorrect. Even owning a legal copy of the disc does not grant one permission to obtain it, also, via illegal means.

586271667[/snapback]

Are you serious? So you're saying that if I go the store and buy a CD, then go online and download that same CD, that I can't do that?

Christ. Boggles the mind that something that is so obviously OK would be illegal. Assuming I'm understanding this correctly, might as well make food illegal too. Makes just as much sense, the way I see it.

EDIT: In regards to the FG movie, as much as I would love to see it, and as many ways I have of obtaining it (just like everybody else), I may have to actually pass on downloading it. I mean, the show already got cancelled a few times. I don't want to do anything that might cause it to get cancelled again.

Are you serious? So you're saying that if I go the store and buy a CD, then go online and download that same CD, that I can't do that?

Christ. Boggles the mind that something that is so obviously OK would be illegal. Assuming I'm understanding this correctly, might as well make food illegal too. Makes just as much sense, the way I see it.

586271732[/snapback]

I believe bangbang is misinformed on that particular issue.

I believe bangbang is misinformed on that particular issue.

586271742[/snapback]

Um, no I'm not. You can have a subscription to medication, but buying it from a guy on the street is still illegal. In the ned, only authorized dealers have the right to distribute copyrighted material. The people you download the files from are not authorizzed to distribute the material since they neither own the copyrights nor the permission to distribute the material. Downloading from these distributors includes you in the crime. Read the DMCA and standard copyright laws.

I believe bangbang is misinformed on that particular issue.

586271742[/snapback]

I believe you are misinformed. That would mean if you buy an album on iTunes you can walk into Best Buy and grab yourself a copy. No, that's stealing. Instead, you can make a copy of what you own, not take someone elses copy.

I believe you are misinformed. That would mean if you buy an album on iTunes you can walk into Best Buy and grab yourself a copy. No, that's stealing. Instead, you can make a copy of what you own, not take someone elses copy.

586271766[/snapback]

no....stealing the actual album from a store is stealing someone's chance to own the license to that music, it is stealing the album...how is downloading an album you already own stealing anything....you are twisting it around in a way that makes no sense....when you purchase a cd you purchase the license to listen to that music...therefore you can have copies for personal use....how is me downloading the CD after i already own it any different than me ripping it myself, or copying it onto another CD (or tape)?

the same arguments were made when cassette tapes came out...the industry was complaing that people would just trade copies of albums and that it would hurt album sales.... :blink:

that was a stupid argument, and so is this....if you own a cd/DVD/VHS/cassette you are allowed to have copies for personal use....it only becomes illegal when you try to profit off of them....

Edited by Am_I_Evil
I believe you are misinformed. That would mean if you buy an album on iTunes you can walk into Best Buy and grab yourself a copy. No, that's stealing. Instead, you can make a copy of what you own, not take someone elses copy.

586271766[/snapback]

That isn't the same thing at all. You are suggesting that a license to listen to 'album x' allows you to walk into a store and steal the CD it was pressed on.

And bangbang, right in the middle of the copyright section of the DMCA is the following

`? OTHER RIGHTS, ETC., NOT AFFECTED- (1) Nothing in this section shall affect rights, remedies, limitations, or defenses to copyright infringement, including fair use, under this title.

Backing-up anything one holds a license to would fall under fair use. If one's[bonly>[/b]> method to back something up is to download it, that falls under fair use.

That isn't the same thing at all.  You are suggesting that a license to listen to 'album x'  allows you to walk into a store and steal the CD it was pressed on.

And bangbang, right in the middle of the copyright section of the DMCA is the following

Backing-up anything one holds a license to would fall under fair use.  If one's only method to back something up is to download it, that falls under fair use.

586271806[/snapback]

The DMCA comes into play, though. Technically, the software used to rip DVD's has be deemed illegal (remember dvdcopyx?). Also, as soon as the user distributes the file and you download it, the crime moves past the DMCA and onto federal copyright grounds. Also, remember, unless you're a leech, you do upload while downloading meaning you are distributing the copyrighted works also.

*Yawn.* Do people actually still debate piracy as if there's some all-powerful solution? Piracy will never go away as long as games, movies, music, etc. are so overpriced. I don't know about anyone else, but I for one am sick of reading pointless debates over people who support this or oppose that. The problem in question in this thread is not piracy, but rather the Neowin ToS. No one here can to crap to stop piracy, so the bickering is rather pointless. The talk of how to obtain warez and what not is another story, as it violates Neowin's rules. Piracy will live on forever until the companies see how they're screwing themselves out of sales by insanely overpriced goods, some of which aren't worth the medium they're printed on... so please Neowin, I beg you.. stop the arguements and please let's all get along?

STEWIE FOR GOVERNOR!

That isn't the same thing at all.  You are suggesting that a license to listen to 'album x'  allows you to walk into a store and steal the CD it was pressed on.

And bangbang, right in the middle of the copyright section of the DMCA is the following

Backing-up anything one holds a license to would fall under fair use.  If one's only method to back something up is to download it, that falls under fair use.

586271806[/snapback]

Downloading isn't making a backup. You're obtaining a copy from another user. Your license entitles you to a backup of your copy, not someone else's.

Besides, no one owns this DVD yet. It's all on pre-order. They have not been given their discs and have not obtained their license to use the disc for personal exhibitions. No one has the legal right to own this except the copyright holder and anyone they've given license to hold a copy thus far.

Besides, no one owns this DVD yet. It's all on pre-order. They have not been given their discs and have not obtained their license to use the disc for personal exhibitions. No one has the legal right to own this except the copyright holder and anyone they've given license to hold a copy thus far.

Agreed... I'm not debating that fact at all. I'm asserting that downloading a video isn't illegal in 100% of all situations.

Downloading isn't making a backup. You're obtaining a copy from another user. Your license entitles you to a backup of your copy, not someone else's.

That is totally up for interpretation, as neither the DMCA nor any other copyright documents clearly state that as a fact. If you suggest otherwise, I'd like to see a link or some other source.

Agreed... I'm not debating that fact at all.? I'm asserting that downloading a videoisn't> illegal in 100% of all situations.

That is totally up for interpretation, as neither the DMCA nor any other copyright documents clearly state that as a fact.? If you suggest otherwise, I'd like to see a link or some other source.

586272328[/snapback]

it's not up for interpretation.

you know, you could make a good lawyer...but not in america. I just read all of your posts and i think a lot of your arrogance about downloading is because you're in canada where these laws are slowly taking place there.

My question to you is, if you can afford 3 dvd's, why can't you afford a dvd burner? You can easily get them for around $40 now. Or how can you download dvd's and yet not be able to back them up? I bet you burn the download dvd's to a dvd, but wait a minute....you can't copy your own dvd's?:o:o

Also, like a few people have said, as far as torrents go, you ARE uploading to another user that may or may not be buying the dvd/cd/etc, therefore you are not just downloading. You help other people illegaly obtain the product. The product you buy in the store is not what you download, and again, just like someone else said, you can't go to the store and take a cd you bought from iTunes and vice versa. If it's not in the DMCA, I'm sure it in some sort of agreement, just like what Valve do. You can download Half-Life 2 online OR you can get the retail dvd or cd at the storeBUT NOT BOTHb>. If you loose the copy of your cd-key on your retail disc, you're screwed. When you re-install you will need a new key. At a business stance I would have to say what they say and that's "tough ****."

If you want to get your "backup" go for it man, but the rules at neowin state you can't talk about warez. So come on, for the better of this community, leave it off the damn forums. I'm sick of it, and I hope there are more people like me that want it gone. Use a torrent forum if you want to talk about torrent-warez.

Edited by Meshuggah
it's not up for interpretation.

you know, you could make a good lawyer...but not in america. I just read all of your posts and i think a lot of your arrogance about downloading is because you're in canada where these laws are slowly taking place there.

My question to you is, if you can afford 3 dvd's, why can't you afford a dvd burner? You can easily get them for around $40 now. Or how can you download dvd's and yet not be able to back them up? I bet you burn the download dvd's to a dvd, but wait a minute....you can't copy your own dvd's?  :o

Also, like a few people have said, as far as torrents go, you ARE uploading to another user that may or may not be buying the dvd/cd/etc, therefore you are not just downloading. You help other people illegaly obtain the product. The product you buy in the store is not what you download, and again, just like someone else said, you can't go to the store and take a cd you bought from iTunes and vice versa. If it's not in the DMCA, I'm sure it in some sort of agreement, just like what Valve do. You can download Half-Life 2 online OR you can get the retail dvd or cd at the store. BUT NOT BOTH. If you loose the copy of your cd-key on your retail disc, you're screwed. When you re-install you will need a new key. At a business stance I would have to say what they say and that's "tough ****."

If you want to get your "backup" go for it man, but the rules at neowin state you can't talk about warez. So come on, for the better of this community, leave it off the damn forums. I'm sick of it, and I hope there are more people like me that want it gone. Use a torrent forum if you want to talk about torrent-warez.

586272486[/snapback]

Of course the legality of downloading material you hold a license for is open for interpretation. Nowhere in the DMCA does it specifically state or suggest that one is violating the terms of the act by downloading a movie (iso) that one already owns on DVD. Perhaps you should google DMCA and read it. If it's not written in the act, not you nor anyone from Fat City can tell me otherwise.

Once again, when one purchases a movie from the local store, one is purchasing a license to view the material and the disc the material is pressed on. In other words, at the point of purchase (time of transaction), one has a license to view the movie. Under fair use, one is entitled to make backup copies of the movie whether it be on a hdd (iso) or a dvd (read DVD CCA Surrenders in Burner DVD Descrambling Case). That being said, one (downloader) is not in violation of any copyright laws by downloading a movie he/she already owns on dvd.

It is absurd that some of you are suggesting then that this is no different than purchasing music online via itunes and then walking into a shop and pocketing that same CD. When purchasing licenses to listen to music via itunes, you are not purchasing an accompanying CD, case, or cover art. What makes you think, then, that you can take the CD when clearly you never paid for any physical component of the 'CD' at all... just the license (read: rights) to listen to it. What would happen if your ipod broke and you had to replace your unit? You wouldn't have to pay for all those songs again... you'd be allowed to download them because you already paid for a license to listen to that music.

Likewise, since you mentioned Steam and HL2, I should also mention that those who purchased the retail box can and are entitled to download the game via Steam as well... and obviously no one is asserting that those who purchased online via steam have the right to walk into Wal-Mart and snatch a copy of the game... that would be absurd.

Your attempts to squash my point by asserting, "it's not up for interpretation", are in vein. I have a firm grasp of my rights as a consumer, license holder, and Canadian citizen. Better luck trying to manipulate the next trick.

Edited by joekr
Um, no I'm not. You can have a subscription to medication, but buying it from a guy on the street is still illegal. In the ned, only authorized dealers have the right to distribute copyrighted material. The people you download the files from are not authorizzed to distribute the material since they neither own the copyrights nor the permission to distribute the material. Downloading from these distributors includes you in the crime. Read the DMCA and standard copyright laws.

586271762[/snapback]

Ahhhh, so what you are saying is that you are not allowed to buy something which is second-hand, as they have no right to sell it?

Damn thats f*cked up. :rofl:

? dont know......i have already read the 6 pages.....still dont know whatz the problem.....i have a dvdrw machine i record directly from tv, not just FG anything i like to....for example ihave Shrek2, i bought it when in it came out and i already recorde it when hbo air it few months ago...why? cause i have a 4 year old son....i also bought the incredibles, some games,etc and i already make not just 1 2 copies of each cuase as i said i have a 4 year old son and i aint gonna give him the originals and when i cant copy i just download it......there are some good arguments here but overall is BS....i saw when VCR came to public and saw the same arguments and still there are VCR's today, there no difference and dont give the crap of the digital copy most people dont give a damn about it as long as is watchable......there is no difference if i copy from tv, from the video store or a friend that bought a dvd and copy for me, that what friends will do........long live the torrents

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Subtitle Edit is a powerful, free, and user-friendly subtitle editing tool designed for creating, editing, and converting subtitles for videos. It supports a wide range of subtitle formats, including SRT, ****, and SUB, allowing users to easily modify and adjust subtitles for accurate timing and formatting. With its intuitive interface, Subtitle Edit provides a variety of features such as waveform audio display, spell-check, subtitle synchronization, and real-time video preview, making it an ideal choice for both beginners and professionals. The software also includes powerful tools for batch processing, translating subtitles, and converting between different subtitle formats. Subtitle Edit features: Create/adjust/sync/translate subtitle lines Convert between SubRib, MicroDVD, Advanced Sub Station Alpha, Sub Station Alpha, D-Cinema, SAMI, youtube sbv, and many more (300+ different formats!) Cool audio visualizer control - can display wave form and/or spectrogram Video player uses mpv, DirectShow, or VLC media player Visually sync/adjust a subtitle (start/end position and speed) Audio to text (speech recognition) via Whisper or Vosk/Kaldi Auto Translation via Google translate Rip subtitles from a (decrypted) dvd Import and OCR VobSub sub/idx binary subtitles Import and OCR Blu-ray .sup files - bd sup reading is based on Java code from BDSup2Sub Can open subtitles embedded inside Matroska files Can open subtitles (text, closed captions, VobSub) embedded inside mp4/mv4 files Can open/OCR XSub subtitles embedded inside divx/avi files Can open/OCR DVB and teletext subtitles embedded inside .ts/.m2ts (Transport Stream) files Can open/OCR Blu-ray subtitles embedded inside .m2ts (Transport Stream) files Merge/split subtitles Adjust display time Fix common errors wizard....and more. Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 changelog: Subtitle Edit 5 is a major new release and a big step for the project. For the first time, Subtitle Edit runs natively on Windows, macOS, and Linux from a single, modern, cross-platform codebase. The builds are self-contained, so no separate .NET installation is required, and on macOS and Linux the needed media components (mpv/ffmpeg) are bundled in. Please read before upgrading: Subtitle Edit 5 is a new application, not just an update of Subtitle Edit 4. It has been rebuilt from the ground up to be cross-platform, so: It is not 100% the same app. The look, layout, and some workflows have changed. Some things are in different places, and a few behave differently than in SE4. Not every SE4 feature exists in SE5 yet. SE5 covers all the core editing, conversion, sync, video playback, OCR, and online services, but some of the more specialized SE4 tools are not available yet. Features will continue to be added. If you rely on a specific SE4 feature that is missing, please keep SE4 installed alongside SE5. The easiest way to run both side by side is to use the Portable versions of SE4 and SE5, which keep their settings separate and do not interfere with each other. Which version should I use? Subtitle Edit 5: recommended for most users on Windows 10 (22H2) or newer, macOS 12+, and Linux. Subtitle Edit 4: please continue to use SE4 if you are on an older Windows version (Windows 7/8), or on older / slower computers where SE5 may not run well. SE4 remains available and is the right choice in those cases. To run SE4 and SE5 at the same time, use the Portable versions - you can try SE5 while keeping SE4 as a fallback. Download: Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 | ARM64 | ~60.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Subtitle Edit Portable | 103.0 MB View: Subtitle Edit Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Google Pixel 11 series: Here's what to expect by Hamid Ganji Google Pixel 10 series In recent years, Google has successfully turned its Pixel devices into worthy contenders in the smartphone market. The search giant is now preparing to launch the Pixel 11 series in just a few months, and many Pixel fans are likely wondering what Google has in store for them this year. The next lineup of Google smartphones includes four devices: the Pixel 11, Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL, and Pixel 11 Pro Fold. This year, we don’t expect Google to bring revolutionary upgrades to its handsets, and the Pixel 11 series is likely to receive modest hardware improvements alongside a slew of AI-powered features. Here are the rumored specifications of the Google Pixel 11 series ahead of its official debut: When will the new Pixel phones be unveiled? The last two generations of Google Pixel phones (Pixel 9 series and Pixel 10 series) were launched in August, unlike the previous three generations that debuted in October. With that in mind, we expect Google to unveil the Pixel 11 series sometime in August 2026. The exact launch date has yet to be confirmed. Google Pixel 11 CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines How much will the Pixel 11 series cost? Predicting the final price of upcoming smartphones has become increasingly difficult. As you may know, RAM and memory prices are rising sharply, leading to significant increases in the cost of consumer electronics. Recently, Apple CEO Tim Cook said that price increases for some future Apple products are unavoidable, suggesting that the iPhone 18 series could become more expensive. Google has remained tight-lipped about any potential price increases for the Pixel 11 series. If the company manages to maintain last year’s pricing structure, here’s what the lineup could cost: Pixel 11: $799 Pixel 11 Pro: $999 Pixel 11 Pro XL: $1,199 Pixel 11 Pro Fold: $1,799 Given current market conditions, it may be difficult for Google to avoid raising prices unless it adopts cost-saving measures, such as equipping the base model with 8GB of RAM. Google Pixel 11 series anticipated specs: We expect the Google Pixel 11 series to debut with a new Tensor G6 processor as well as an upgraded camera system. The overall design, however, is expected to remain largely unchanged across the lineup. Specifications Pixel 11 Pixel 11 Pro Pixel 11 Pro XL Pixel 11 Pro Fold Display 6.3-inch LTPO AMOLED / 120Hz refresh rate / up to 3100 nits of brightness 6.3-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 6.8-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 8-inch inner screen and 6.4-inch outer display, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness RAM & Processor Tensor G6 / 8-12GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 16GB of RAM Storage options 128GB or 256GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB Camera 50MP main sensor, 13MP ultra-wide, 10.8MP 5x telephoto, 10.5MP front camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 10.5MP ultra-wide camera, 10.8MP telephoto camera, 10MP front camera, 10MP inner camera Battery 4,840 mAh 4,707 mAh 5,000 mAh 4,658 mAh Software Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 The Pixel 11 series won’t be a major departure from its predecessor, with Google instead focusing on subtle improvements and AI additions such as Gemini Intelligence. However, a patent filed by Google suggests the company is working on a removable battery for its smartphones, and we could see this feature make its way to the Pixel 11 Pro Fold. Given that nearly all smartphones today lack removable batteries, such a feature would be a welcome addition to future Pixel devices. That said, it may not arrive with this year’s lineup after all, and the final decision is yet to be made by Google. The Pixel 11 series could also face an uphill battle in the market. In the Android segment, Samsung is performing well with the Galaxy S26 series, while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 lineup is also expected to launch next month. On the other hand, Apple is preparing to unveil the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max in September alongside its first foldable iPhone.
    • At least AMD is still taking Windows 10 seriously (after the oops) before it consumer extended support ends. @WaltC - Memories, 2x Voodoo in SLI with a Riva TNT with an Aureal A3D soundcard.
    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!