DMCA regulations


Recommended Posts

Of course the legality of downloading material you hold a license for is open for interpretation.?Nowhere> in the DMCA does it specifically state or suggest that one is violating the terms of the act by downloading a movie (iso) that one already owns on DVD.? Perhaps you should google DMCA and read it.? If it's not written in the act, not you nor anyone frFat City/i> can tell me otherwise.

Once again, when one purchases a movie from the local store, one is purchasing a license view/i>[/b]/b> the materiand/i> the disc the material is pressed on.? In other words, at the point of purchase (time of transaction), one has a license to view the movie.? Ufair usee, one is entitled to make backup copies of the movie whether it be on a hdd (iso) or a dvd (read DVD CCA Surrenders in Burner DVD Descrambling Case).? That being said, one (downloadenotot in violation of any copyright laws by downloading a movie he/she already owns on dvd.

It is absurd that some of you are suggesting then that this is no different than purchasing music online via itunes and then walking into a shop and pocketing that same CD.? When purclicensesses to listen to music via itunes, ynotnot purchasing an accompanying CD, case, or cover art.? What makes you think, then, that you can take the CD when clearly you never paid for any physical component of the 'CD' at all... jlicenseense (read: rights) to listen to it.? What would happen if your ipod broke and you had to replace your unit?? You wouldn't have to pay for all those songs again... you'd be allowed to download them bealready paid for a license to listen to that music music.

Likewise, since you mentioned Steam and HL2, I should also mention that those who purchased the rcancanentitledtitled to download the game via Steam as well... and obviously no one is asserting that those who purchased online via steam have the right to walk into Wal-Mart and snatch a copy of the game... that would be absurd.

Your attempts to squash my point by assertiit's not up for interpretationtation", are in vein.? I have a firm grasp of my rights as a consumer, license holder, and Canadian citizen.? Better luck trying to manipulate the next trick.

586272723[/snapback]

Yes, as a canadian citizen, my whole point exactly. You don't live in America where tons of people are constantly being sued. You think that living a few thousand miles north than us entitles you to download as much as you and proclaim your 'freedom' to download **** you will never buy. Just wait a f:D months. :D

You can say you own your "liscence" for viewing movies all you want, but THIS MOVIE, you cannot. It's not in stores, there's no way of owning it right now. My point is, I don't think really anyone in neowin doesn't have pirated material in some fashion on their computer, however neowin wasn't made to talk about all the latest dvds/cds leaking online so kids can proclaim they have it. Rules are rules, and like I said before, if you want to download it, fine man, I really don't care what you do in your own home. But if you'reobeying>obeying laws and rules, why don't you obey a simple forum rule? Don't talk about warez....jesus, that's all I ask...

Everyday It seems I have to fight this place about warez. I'm sick of it. This place really wasn't like this until bittorrent flooded everything and then EVERYONE had access to things they never could get before. I'm sick of seeing it on this board. Do you understand that?

Stop being a ****ing prick and obey the rules. I don't give a **** if you think living in Canada or Sweeden or anything other place that doesn't have firm laws on this stuff.

Edited by Meshuggah
Once again, when one purchases a movie from the local store, one is purchasing a license to view the material and the disc the material is pressed on.  In other words, at the point of purchase (time of transaction), one has a license to view the movie.  Under fair use, one is entitled to make backup copies of the movie whether it be on a hdd (iso) or a dvd (read DVD CCA Surrenders in Burner DVD Descrambling Case).  That being said, one (downloader) is not in violation of any copyright laws by downloading a movie he/she already owns on dvd.

Again, you have a very warped view of how this works. You're allowed to make a backup copy of your copy of the material. Your license doesn't give you right to view the material in every form in every case. As a result, it also doesn't give you the right to obtain your backup from another user's copy (which is what you do when downloading).

It is absurd that some of you are suggesting then that this is no different than purchasing music online via itunes and then walking into a shop and pocketing that same CD.  When purchasing licenses to listen to music via itunes, you are not purchasing an accompanying CD, case, or cover art.  What makes you think, then, that you can take the CD when clearly you never paid for any physical component of the 'CD' at all... just the license (read: rights) to listen to it.  What would happen if your ipod broke and you had to replace your unit?  You wouldn't have to pay for all those songs again... you'd be allowed to download them because you already paid for a license to listen to that music.

Actually, no. If you delete a song you purchased on iTunes, that song is gone forever. You have to re-purchase it if you want another copy. If you break your favorite CD, you can't go to the store and get another copy. Same idea, just different a medium.

You also have the ability to burn those tracks to disk for backup reasons. However, you don't have the right or ability to download them from the internet. The license you have is for the Apple-provided versions of those tracks, not for one you obtain over a filesharing network.

Likewise, since you mentioned Steam and HL2, I should also mention that those who purchased the retail box can and are entitled to download the game via Steam as well... and obviously no one is asserting that those who purchased online via steam have the right to walk into Wal-Mart and snatch a copy of the game... that would be absurd.

Actually, any copy of Half Life 2 you buy in store is actually just a disk copy of the game files, minus the executable to run them. You need to connect to the internet to play the game. So, by buying it in stores, you're paying for distrobution via CD, versus the internet. You get a license to play the game on your machine, but can also download and play it on others under the same license, as they distribute the files at no cost over the internet.

You can say you own your "liscence" for viewing movies all you want, but THIS MOVIE, you cannot. It's not in stores, there's no way of owning it right now. My point is, I don't think really anyone in neowin doesn't have pirated material in some fashion on their computer, however neowin wasn't made to talk about all the latest dvds/cds leaking online so kids can proclaim they have it. Rules are rules, and like I said before, if you want to download it, fine man, I really don't care what you do in your own home. But if you're so keen on obeying laws and rules, why don't you obey a simple forum rule? Don't talk about warez....jesus, that's all I ask...

I'm not talking about warez, hypocrite. Let's try and stay on topic.

Yes, as a canadian citizen, my whole point exactly. You don't live in America where tons of people are constantly being sued. You think that living a few thousand miles north than us entitles you to download as much as you and proclaim your 'freedom' to download **** you will never buy. Just wait a few months.

bittorrent flooded everything and then EVERYONE had access to things they never could get before. I'm sick of seeing it on this board. Do you understand that?

Stop being a ****ing prick and obey the rules. I don't give a **** if you think living in Canada or Sweeden or anything other place that doesn't have firm laws on this stuff.

You're right. I don't live in America ( :rolleyes: ). Of course I'm going to obey the laws of the country I'm from and not yours. What's your point? Are you trying to assert I have to obey your laws too? Your egocentric approach (both as an individual and as a nation) to this discussion is blatantly obvious. You follow the rules in your country, and I'll follow the rules in mine. Neowin is a site with visitors from all countries around the world... not only the United States. You don't want to hear about other country's policies? To effing bad. Get used to it. I have every right to discuss topical issues and how they relate to Canada's policies.

Actually, no. If you delete a song you purchased on iTunes, that song is gone forever. You have to re-purchase it if you want another copy. If you break your favorite CD, you can't go to the store and get another copy. Same idea, just different a medium.

It appears that I am in error regarding the itunes policy. I'll have to forfeight my itunes argument on this matter. I still stand by my interpretation of the DMCA, however.

Again, you have a very warped view of how this works. You're allowed to make a backup copy of your copy of the material. Your license doesn't give you right to view the material in every form in every case. As a result, it also doesn't give you the right to obtain your backup from another user's copy (which is what you do when downloading).

Supply a link to the official document which explicitly states the above (bolded) is true... I won't hold my breath.

so someone tell me again how is dl'ing DVD off of the web when you have it (the store bought DVD) any different from downloading a game when you already have it and just lost a CD?

EBGames reps told me I can download the game if I still have my cd-key and I don't need to buy another copy. Besides when you download a game it still has Licence agreement in it, when you dowload movie it usually has licence stuff stripped, so you don't agree to anything (when you buy DVD you agree with terms of service on the back, when you watch DVD you agree with that licence about not copying it contains even if you manage to skip it somehow). When you dl a DVD rip you don't agree to anything, since it doesn't ask for anything and it contains no licence.

Personally, i think cd's should be $4.99-$6.99 and dvd's should be $9.99, but that will never happen. Point is, if you want to be entertained, you better not expect it to be free. And this goes for every job out there.

A teacher doesn't teach for free, an alcoholic doesn't drink for a free, an insurance company doesn't insure someone for free. so why should an entertainer entertain people for free?

Music and any form of entertainment is a scapegoat. Most people listen to music to get something out of it in some way, shape or fashion. If they get something out of it (positive or negative) then the person that wrote it should be compensated. It's as simple as that. Nothing in the world is free, people need to just deal with that. Hell man, love isn't even free.

::: so lexor, because it doesn't have an agreement in the dvd, you're entitled to steal it? I'm not talking about things you own, I'm talking about things you don't own and won't buy.

TPS: I don't know what they do with movies, but those 3 cd's I have have embedded watermarks with my name on them. So even if I did leak cds (which I don't), I would be screwed and loose my job.

::: so lexor, because it doesn't have an agreement in the dvd, you're entitled to steal it? I'm not talking about things you own, I'm talking about things you don't own and won't buy.

586275212[/snapback]

My reply was to a earlier comment by bangbang (I believe) who said that if you have DVD dl'ing it is still illegal.

I want to know how it is different from games, for which I can download copies if I have original.

I'm not talking about warez, hypocrite.? Let's try and stay on topic.

You're right.? I don't live in America :rolleyes:s: ).? Of course I'm going to obey the laws of the country I'm from and not yours.? What's your point?? Are you trying to assert I have to obey your laws too?? Your egocentric approach (both as an individual and as a nation) to this discussion is blatantly obvious.? You follow the rules in your country, and I'll follow the rules in mine.? Neowin is a site with visitors from all countries around the world... not only the United States.? You don't want to hear about other country's poTo effing bad.? Get used to it. to it.? I have every right to discuss topical issues and how they relate to Canada's policies.

It appears that I am in error regarding the itunes policy.? I'll have to forfeight my itunes argument on this matter.? I still stand by my interpretation of the DMCA, however.

Supply a link to the official document which explicitly states the above (bolded) is true... I won't hold my breath.

586275170[/snapback]

All I'm going to say is this... When Canada's laws get tighter and you're being held by your balls with a lawsuit in your hands because you went on a public place and talked explicitly about content you have stolen, don't come crying to anyone about it.

Actually, let me say this. Since you seem to obey the laws so well, are you going to continue respecting Canada when they say downloading dvds and cd's is illegal? Are you going to stop downloading once you're loving country says you can't do it anymore?

Once that happens, you'll be fighting for your rights just like Americans are.

TPS: of course you can rip dvd's from netflix. THAT is definatly under fair-rights use.

you can discuss things all you want, but this whole stupid topic is about a leak. oh wait, what are the ruNo Warez (links) & Cracks.

Help, requests or posts that discuss circumvention. This includes linking to illegally obtained software, movies & music files - posting about it, and suggesting to get it.

get it.

this thread originally had to be cleaned because of people posting torrents.

Edited by Meshuggah
All I'm going to say is this... When Canada's laws get tighter and you're being held by your balls with a lawsuit in your hands because you went on a public place and talked explicitly about content you have stolen, don't come crying to anyone about it.

586275355[/snapback]

might as well give up, you cant talk to kids like this, they dont want to hear your point of view (or mine). Just hope they grow up and take responsibility for themselfs and stop blaming others (the person who leaked it in the studio, the man on the street selling the bootleg, "because i have fast connection that lets me")

the world is unforgiving when your of legal age, if you get caught now its just your parents who get in trouble not you ,well it all passes down to you, they get the legal trouble you get you parents trouble/punishment :pinch:

probably more than you, illz55, that's for sure....One of these days ill take some pictures of all the media i own

and ****, at least im giving them something instead of just clicking on "downlaod this torrent"

::::i cant discuss this anymore...im off to the studio to mix some music...better things to do :rolleyes:

probably more than you, that's for sure....One of these days ill take some pictures of all the media i own

586275385[/snapback]

First of all, use your eyes and brain to notice that question wasn't directed at you. Secondly, your assumption is quite egocentric and pathetic. Besides, I don't expect any honest answer from you or the person I asked the question in the beginning anyways. I hope you fall of the high-horse you're on and break your backs. From the way you're acting and what you are writing, it seems that you (and people like you) are (the only ones) providing nearly all of the financial feedback and profit to the creators of all these media entertainment works that downloaders like me are vermin that should be exterminated.

I asked dolimite35 (after quoting his post) how many DVDs/Music CDs he owns, not you Meshuggah.

well there will always be a line that divides us on this, but i see more and more here on neowin that while the "dont do it" people come up with good reasons and are responded with poor examples and reasons from the "do it". Its funny really to blame others for your downloading because its simply out there and you can.

All I'm going to say is this... When Canada's laws get tighter and you're being held by your balls with a lawsuit in your hands because you went on a public place and talked explicitly about content you have stolen, don't come crying to anyone about it.

Actually, let me say this. Since you seem to obey the laws so well, are you going to continue respecting Canada when they say downloading dvds and cd's is illegal? Are you going to stop downloading once you're loving country says you can't do it anymore?

Once that happens, you'll be fighting for your rights just like Americans are.

Yes... in the meantime, Canadian Laws are different than American laws. When they propose changes (which they already have if you've ever followed Canadian politics) citizens will speak up for what they believe in. Why would changing laws make me disrespect my country? Laws in Canada probably aren't going to get to the point where someone can sue me over spilled hot coffee or where airport security can body search me but miss a pocket knife in my mother's purse (she left it there by accident).
you can discuss things all you want, but this whole stupid topic is about a leak. oh wait, what are the rules again??

No Warez (links) & Cracks.

Help, requests or posts that discuss circumvention. This includes linking to illegally obtained software, movies & music files - posting about it, and suggesting to get it.

this thread originally had to be cleaned because of people posting torrents.

586275355[/snapback]

Ok... so who defines illegal? America? Britain? Tibet?

And yes... three (If I counted right) mods have already cleaned up this thread from torrents and download links... but it hasn't been closed yet. IMO, it's a good discussion about rights and such, and therefore shouldn't be closed.

As for downloading a copy of a CD that I already own... what is the moral or ethical reason why I cannot do this? (i.e. why is it wrong, not illegal) I own the CD, so I have the opportunity to make a backup copy of it and rip it to my hard drive. I have paid money for the CD/licence, so what is the problem with downloading a backup copy that someone else has made? Is it not the same music? The same bytes of data on my hard drive (more or less)?

Um, no I'm not. You can have a subscription to medication, but buying it from a guy on the street is still illegal. In the ned, only authorized dealers have the right to distribute copyrighted material. The people you download the files from are not authorizzed to distribute the material since they neither own the copyrights nor the permission to distribute the material. Downloading from these distributors includes you in the crime. Read the DMCA and standard copyright laws.

586271762[/snapback]

Then may I suggest you to read it too?

Downloaders can't be held responsible for what they are downloading because they aren't in control of file content over the internet, uploaders are.

well there will always be a line that divides us on this, but i see more and more here on neowin that while the "dont do it" people come up with good reasons and are responded with poor examples and reasons from the "do it". Its funny really to blame others for your downloading because its simply out there and you can.

586275448[/snapback]

Do you mean to say that all the "don't download" people are more intelligent than those on the other side of the line?

I want to bring up another point. Ask nearly any electronic dance music producer/DJ what they think of downloading (music) for free and 8 or maybe even 9 times out of 10, you will get a "do it" response. Why? Well, it actually somehow brings them more profit, exposure and motivation. Now, keep in mind, most of these artists do not make nearly as much money as the popular musicians and movie makers in the (North American) mainstream that you and the majority of people would recognize. And yet, for some silly reason all these musicians I know of who by the way are talented, intelligent and mature individuals are part of the "do it" crowd. How strange that is eh?

Do you mean to say that all the "don't download" people are more intelligent than those on the other side of the line?

I want to bring up another point. Ask nearly any electronic dance music producer/DJ what they think of downloading (music) for free and 8 or maybe even 9 times out of 10, you will get a "do it" response. Why? Well, it actually somehow brings them more profit, exposure and motivation. Now, keep in mind, most of these artists do not make nearly as much money as the popular musicians and movie makers in the (North American) mainstream that you and the majority of people would recognize. And yet, for some silly reason all these musicians I know of who by the way are talented, intelligent and mature individuals are part of the "do it" crowd. How strange that is eh?

586275481[/snapback]

And that story has somthing to do with what were talking about how????

I didnt say the "dont do it" are more intelligent and you bring that story (a poor example) thinking i said that.

joekr...let's tone it down a bit.

First thing, the DMCA is a US law. Why you are arguing that it applies to you in Canada, I have no idea. But given your current inaccurate stance towards that law, you best be paying attention to what Canada brings in.

It's inaccurate for a couple reasons. The majority of which, timdorr and bangbang have already described. Bottom line, yeah you can make yourself a backup copy of the actual dvd you bought. No where in the DMCA does it give you the right to download another copy. What it DOES say, is that it's illegal to distribute copies of said material. When you choose to download those illegal copies, you are aiding and abetting the distributor. If you happen to be using bittorrent, you are also uploading to other users while downloading, making you fully liable for that illegal distrubution.

If you are caught with those illegally obtained copies, you WILL be prosecuted under the DMCA law. You can complain and moan all day saying we are wrong, but in the end it's just a poor justification for your activities. On top of that, a very poor understanding of your rights

The DMCA comes into play, though. Technically, the software used to rip DVD's has be deemed illegal (remember dvdcopyx?). Also, as soon as the user distributes the file and you download it, the crime moves past the DMCA and onto federal copyright grounds. Also, remember, unless you're a leech, you do upload while downloading meaning you are distributing the copyrighted works also.

586271838[/snapback]

DVDcopyX was a totally different story. DVDcopyX was actually cracking the protection.
Then may I suggest you to read it too?

Downloaders can't be held responsible for what they are downloading because they aren't in control of file content over the internet, uploaders are.

586275480[/snapback]

They can, and have been held responsible in several cases. Claim ignorance or whatever, you're still screwed.

And that story has somthing to do with what were talking about how????

I didnt say the "dont do it" are more intelligent and you bring that story (a poor example) thinking i said that.

586275519[/snapback]

You may have not said it exactly like that, but you said from what you've seen here on Neowin the "don't download" people have brough out more proper reasons and arguments for their beliefs. That means they have to be more intelligent and knowledgable (at least on this subject), so you are inferring that with your statements.

And if you cannot see how my other point/story has something to do with our talks of downloading for free, then you (under 90 IQ?) are no longer worth debating with or talking to!

if you main concern is getting rich dont make something that can be stolen so easily

there are plenty of investments that cant be stolen digitally

personally I love the revolution that has been going on since napster.? the end of the copywrite and free information for all?:cool:l:

586275533[/snapback]

I concur!

For all you copyright and legality/law lovers (who've been arguing with us bad, bad downloaders), take a look at this: http://creativecommons.org/wired/

Good stuff!

If you are caught with those illegally obtained copies, you WILL be prosecuted under the DMCA law.  You can complain and moan all day saying we are wrong, but in the end it's just a poor justification for your activities.  On top of that, a very poor understanding of your rights

Im not even convinced these e-police exist

anyway lets suppose they did. shouldnt they need a warrant to eavesdrop on a person's internet connection. I know phone taps arent permissable in court unless they have a warrant.

joekr...let's tone it down a bit.

First thing, the DMCA is a US law.  Why you are arguing that it applies to you in Canada, I have no idea.  But given your current inaccurate stance towards that law, you best be paying attention to what Canada brings in.

It's inaccurate for a couple reasons.  The majority of which, timdorr and bangbang have already described.  Bottom line, yeah you can make yourself a backup copy of the actual dvd you bought.  No where in the DMCA does it give you the right to download another copy.  What it DOES say, is that it's illegal to distribute copies of said material.  When you choose to download those illegal copies, you are aiding and abetting the distributor.  If you happen to be using bittorrent, you are also uploading to other users while downloading, making you fully liable for that illegal distrubution.

If you are caught with those illegally obtained copies, you WILL be prosecuted under the DMCA law.  You can complain and moan all day saying we are wrong, but in the end it's just a poor justification for your activities.  On top of that, a very poor understanding of your rights

586275524[/snapback]

Now I know that if I'm not sharing I'm ok, thanks a lot.
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I forgot to add on my comment that when robots will take physical jobs, it's when they become more cheaper to manufacture and sell. That will be the starting point of the end to lanscaping, trash pickup, factory jobs, etc.
    • How many people can actually use a 2.5gig ethernet port? Most people do not have more than a 1gig internet connection, heck most have less than that. Most people at home do not have a switch that has multiple 2.5gig ports either.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!