Recommended Posts

Anyone running a mobile willing to comment on performance (specifically how well the GUI functions on mobile gfx cards)?

586283711[/snapback]

I will be able to comment on that later on. I am installing x86 on my laptop and 64bit on my desktop.

We shall see.

NTFS... are you serious? I mean, you think they went to FAT? hahaha

586283766[/snapback]

I think he didn't know if Windows Future Storage had been implemented yet, and the answer to THAT question is it won't be in the shipping version of Vista but it will be shipped as an additional download.

After I read this article... I feel that Beta 2 will be WAYY better than Beta 1...

http://news.com.com/A+window+into+Vista/20...html?tag=st.num

Beta 1 has already improved a lot since XP.. all I gotta say is:

"can't wait for PDC, can't wait for Beta 2...Vista will be MS biggest release since 95!!"

Well, I'm going to bed, I'll read in the morning how to enable Avalon on this beta ... I'm beginning to wonder if this is even in this beta!

586283780[/snapback]

I dunno I heard from somewhere that the whole fancy looking theme will be applied in beta 2. Beta 1 is only for devs so they didnt add the fancy crap just yet.

post-95640-1122516604_thumb.jpg

Good point, but I as well would LOVE to hear some new sounds, can you ask or can a mod say something about the matter?

586283613[/snapback]

This is all I get to download, so it's work as usuall , I wish I had the time to screw with this cow some more. I know I will have to , but for now and my brief 480 hours or so with 4074, I DON'T LIKE IT-- But then I didnt like XP when they sprung that on us I was sold on 2000 Advanced Server, ( now how stupid is that??)

I wish they would just let us make some money with XP and leave it but , they must keep tortuing us to learn their new tricks. AS far as i can see its the same sh** just a different day. Thanks to our all-mighty F*** head Uncle Bill

BIG DEAL

and that hack into the reg,, the super fetch crap---- i dont think i am at all impressed,,,, so that aint it and if it is faster than 2003 server i have yet to see it

post-95640-1122516604_thumb.jpg

This is all I get to download, so it's work as usuall , I wish I had the time to screw with this cow some more.  I know I will have to , but for now and my  brief 480 hours or so with 4074, I DON'T LIKE IT--  But then I didnt like XP when they sprung that on us I was sold on 2000 Advanced Server, ( now how stupid is that??)

I wish they would just let us make some money with XP and leave it but , they must keep tortuing us to learn their new tricks.  AS far as i can see its the same sh** just a different day.  Thanks to our all-mighty F*** head  Uncle Bill

BIG DEAL

and that hack into the reg,,  the super fetch crap----  i dont think i am at all impressed,,,, so that aint it and if it is faster than 2003 server i have yet to see it

586283822[/snapback]

Umm...why did you quote me?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • After watching the Apple event earlier this week it is quite the contrast. Apple is going back and tweaking the code to make things more efficient in may areas of MacOS. Windows is boosting your electric build to hide their issues.
    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!