NCAA Bans Indian Mascots from Postseason


Recommended Posts

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050805/ap_on_...ndian_nicknames

"NCAA Bans Indian Mascots From Postseason

By MICHAEL MAROT, AP Sports Writer 14 minutes ago

INDIANAPOLIS - The

NCAA banned the use of American Indian mascots by sports teams during its postseason tournaments, but will not prohibit them otherwise..."

wow, what do you guys think?

i think there are much more important things for them to worry about. Like miami using 11-time convicted criminals on their football team.

i would agree if it was the Illinois Drunken Illini. but it's not. they use these indian names because they embody the positive qualities that the teams want to have. strength, desire, the will to win, etc.

I read this on MSNBC 5 minutes ago and its the stupidest decision they could've made. I just don't see how calling Florida St. the "Seminoles" is an insult; I just cannot see it.

Can someone please tell me what's wrong with the NCAA? They still think the BCS works and now they are banning Indian related mascot names for only the postseason?

Being from Illinois, and being an Illini fan...its pretty freakin' stupid. I didn't go to any of the postseason, so I don't know if the Chief went to the games, but I don't think he did, as he only performs during halftime and is not a fixture on the sidelines to make stupid gestures and pick on other mascots, i.e. Brutus the Buckeye, etc. I have nothing against mascots who provide comic relief, but I feel that the Chief is a very respectable symbol, and that his performance has always been done in a respectable manor.

For the most part, it seems that these protests led on schools who use native american mascots are led not by native americans, but by whiny ass white people who can't find something better to do with their time. If native americans were protesting constantly, I can see changing the rules, or removing the Cheif symbol from the school logo (which has pretty much already happened if you don't live on campus, to save from being targeted.)

If I am remembering correctly, I'm pretty sure that a month or so ago, the Seminole Tribal Council (spare the survivor jokes) told FSU to use their image and their name whenver and whereever they damn well please, they were proud to be represented as a mascot for the university.

The NCAA is just covering their own ass here so maybe the whining will stop for a little bit of time.

My alma matter is the University of North Dakota; home of the Fighting Sioux. Having a Native American "mascot" was an honor.

Ralph Engelstad, a UND alumnus, once gave the University $150 million to build the finest hockey arena in the world. When there was talk of UND changing the mascot name in 2001, he threatened to take back every dime of the donation. THe name change lost 8 - 0.

Edited by Galley
For the most part, it seems that these protests led on schools who use native american mascots are led not by native americans, but by whiny ass white people who can't find something better to do with their time. If native americans were protesting constantly, I can see changing the rules, or removing the Cheif symbol from the school logo (which has pretty much already happened if you don't live on campus, to save from being targeted.)

586332126[/snapback]

This is what sucks the most I think. People who aren't involved turning a non-issue into an issue and getting their way.

If I am remembering correctly, I'm pretty sure that a month or so ago, the Seminole Tribal Council (spare the survivor jokes) told FSU to use their image and their name whenver and whereever they damn well please, they were proud to be represented as a mascot for the university.

586332126[/snapback]

Not only that but the FSU team brings a ton of attention to the Seminoles and their situation in Florida. The council even offered to help the team re-design their logo to more accurately depict the seminoles. The university of course agreed.

While I understand both sides of the argument I think the NCAA is doing it for the wrong reasons. Curious how this news came just as they were set to begin an anti-trust lawsuit brought on by the NIT and Bobby Knight calling them a monopoly on the stand. If they are going to single out the Native Americans as offended people then I would like to see them take into consideration the feelings of those of Irish decent, or the religous few who don't appreciate the Blue Demons, Blue Devils, or Sun Devils or the anti-religous few who don't appreciate the Friars or the Saints. And let's not even mention PETA and the myriad of bulldog, tiger, longhorn, etc mascots.

The NCAA can't be criticized (or so they think) for this kind of move because nobody in their right mind would come out against a ban.

Isn't it funny that the white man killed off native americans and hid the survivors on reservations and now they want to eliminate any references to them and hide them from the public forum.

Wouldn't they be better served by establishing funds and educational services with the schools that do decide to honor a heritage that is distinctly regional?

fightinwhites.jpg

GREELEY, Colo. (AP) _ Unable to persuade a school district to drop a mascot name that offends them, some American Indian students at the University of Northern Colorado have named their intramural basketball team "The Fighting Whities."

Led by Solomon Little Owl, director of Native American Student Services at UNC, the team chose a white man as its mascot to raise awareness and understanding of stereotypes that some cultures endure. "The message is, lets do something that will let people see the other side of what its like to be a mascot," Little Owl said. "I am really

offended by this mascot issue, and I hope the people that support the Eaton mascot will get offended by this."

The team is made up of American Indians, Hispanics and Anglos. They wear jerseys that say "Every thangs going to be all white."

Independent Media Center

So much for those 'whiney ass white people'.

is anybody offended by that though? it's just a sports mascot, it's not that big a deal. fighting whities mean that the team fights for their victories, and i have no problem representing that.

and i just don't get how the fighting irish can be left out either...

Thats BS...the Indians are fighting and wanting the name change...they just expect the best and not accept the worst...they are even whining about "Rivers" and "Creeks" named after Indians...if its not a holy name..they want it changed (unless its a Bingo or Smoke Shop on Indian Land..then they expect it to be Tax Free)....and as for the 150million donation....they whine about names but when it comes to handouts..they shutup....hypocrites.....

Do you think it would be different if instead of fighting whities..maybe it said..the fighting americans and the mascot was the flag. You can't use fighting whities because being white doesn't mean anything to anybody that's white. Being American does though, same for the flag and what it stands for. So if a team on some other land, say Afghanistan, used the flag for there mascot and called themselves the fighting americans, would that make a difference? Just curious what some peeps thought about that scenario.

My father is Native American, my mother is White..I also am a student at UND so I've been through these debates for 4 years. I am just curious to how people react to the flag scenario.

Yes, as an Irishman, I am a little offended that Notre Dame hasn't won a bowlgame since the '93 cotton bowl!

The whole thing is downright silly. Names like 'seminole', illini, Soux, etc, are not racial slurs. No more than "Trojans", or "Spartans".

Now 'Redskins', may be another matter :)

well, as long as it was used in a positive way, i wouldn't have a problem with it. i think being in a different country doesn't apply though, we are all part of the same country here.

they only scenario i can think of thats offensive, say, is like when the florida gators have gators eating indians or something.

ncaa has to be one of the most ass-backwards sporting organizations in existence.  i agree completely lethal.  if they are gonna crack down, why not ban them completely?

586332094[/snapback]

Exactly. The NCAA is a joke. Cracking down halfway (when it really isn't even CLOSE to halfway) is a joke.

I'm not Indian, but I don't understand why people get offended by the nicknames of sports teams. If the Washington Nationals were named the Washington Whiteys, I would not be offended at all. It's not like the names are used in disprespectful manners.

Yes, as an Irishman, I am a little offended that Notre Dame hasn't won a bowlgame since the '93 cotton bowl!

The whole thing is downright silly.? Names like 'seminole', illini, Soux, etc, are not racial slurs.? No more than "Trojans", or "Spartans".?

Now 'Redskins', may be another matter?&nb:); :)

586334459[/snapback]

well...it seems Whiteman and Blackman are acceptable...what makes Redman any less acceptable....does that also mean the Redman Chewing Tobacco will have to change there Brand Name too?...(guess the baseball players will have to use tape to cover up the package)

I can see changing the rules, or removing the Cheif symbol from the school logo (which has pretty much already happened if you don't live on campus, to save from being targeted.)

have you been to champaign in the last six months... the chief is everywhere, not that there is anything wrong with it, but that symbol is EVERYWHERE after the final four

GO SALUKIS

have you been to champaign in the last six months... the chief is everywhere, not that there is anything wrong with it, but that symbol is EVERYWHERE after the final four

GO SALUKIS

586334493[/snapback]

Thats a good example...now if the Chiefs got their butts kicked and embarrased..then the Indians would Demand the Cheif Emblem be taken down and hidden from site....I agree with the top poster....just ban all the names and be done with it...then they can came back and 'Whine' because now noone knows about Indians anymore..... :wacko:

They should force every school to name them after animals. No lawsuits, hopefully, unless those animal rights activists feel that a monkey or whatever might be offended (silly dolts).

Florida Ferrets

Washington Weasels

Atlanta Aardvarks

Minnesota Monkeys

Georgia Gorillas

Indiana Inchworms

Boston Bedbugs

I think that works. :)

Edited by Bearded Kirklander
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I like the show more options. The only problem with it is that it's not always in a consistent spot in the menu. If the copy/paste/cut, happens to show on top, then more option is the last in the menu. But if copy/paste/cut happens to show on the bottom, then more options is before the copy/paste/cut. But I do like the more options because it hides the stuff that I rarely use. But I would like to choose what it is or isn't hiding. That would make it better.
    • I wonder if "put it back the way it was for decades" ever crossed their minds? 🤣
    • Rescind the stupid "Show more options" in context menus and just give us the full menu instead of adding more steps to get to what we want. The "simpler by default" makes me think they'll go in the opposite direction. Every context menu should have a configure button so you can pick and choose what options should be shown, I know you can do that with some registry fu but that shouldn't be required.
    • This is why competition must exist. Finally, pressure is mounting on Microsoft to move in the right direction.
    • Microsoft is making Windows 11's context menus faster, simpler, and configurable by Taras Buria Five years ago, Windows 11 introduced redesigned context menus, offering users a simpler, more modern design. However, customers quickly discovered that the new menus leave a lot to be desired. Many are unhappy with performance (they are really slow), while others dislike the double-layed design, where many options are hidden behind the "Show more options" button. In addition, over the years, menus became cluttered and overloaded. While Microsoft has already fixed plenty of pain points across Windows 11, context menus remain mostly unchanged. Fortunately, Microsoft is finally listening. Marcus Ash, Design and Research Lead for Windows at Microsoft, responded to a tweet on X, confirming that the company is working on fixing Windows 11's context menus. Reworked context menus are supposed to be faster, simpler by default, and "configurable to what you use most." What the latter means is unknown, just like whether Microsoft plans to keep the classic menu alongside the modern one, but according to Marcus, the wait should finally be over soon, as he promised to "share our approach soon." Improved context menus will most likely appear first in Windows 11 preview builds in the Experimental Channel. While we wait for Microsoft to release them, you can try fixing context menus on your PC with a simple tool called Windows 11 Context Menu Manager. It lets you disable entries you do not need, not only cleaning up context menus, but also making them significantly faster. Microsoft has already improved Windows 11's Start menu and taskbar, so hopefully it will address user criticism of the context menu as well. Stay tuned for new Windows 11 preview builds, which usually arrive every Friday.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      248
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!