Space Shuttle Discovery


Recommended Posts

i have to work.. so probably not...

but if it does crash, im sure i'll see it all over the internet...

i know it's a not a nice thing to say.. but it happened last time and the samething happened this this space craft... it's reality.

Someone need to invent internet time so we all have a idea of when stuff is happening lol

whens this in the uk?

586341760[/snapback]

They already have, Swatch did it (as pointed out) or you could say each time and date as UTC, and then convert it to any time offset.

over here, it's landing at 6:45PM, not some ungodly hour, we will all be sitting on the couch to see it.

Are they landing this at night so we can see the debris fly through the air on fire better this time?

The shuttle program is outdated and obsolete, it's highly dangerous and they NEED to ground all of the shuttles and space flights until we either do one of two things

1) Build a spaceship that can be easily maintained, reused, and has several safety protocals, so that if another Columbia does happen, loss of life could be minimal.

2) WE NEED A NEW GOD DAMN PROPULSION SYSTEM. These exploding, volatile, twin and main canisters attached to the shuttle are also as old and obsolete has hell. We've been using rockets for over 60 years (if you include the V2s) and they have had a good run but such things are not ment to last, we need to start building and reseaching (they have already reseached alternatives but costs weigh them down) new engine systems so these things can't blow up on the way to space, just like Challenger.

NASA had its warning back in 1986, and they did nothing, and now Columbia has gone by, and they still have done nothing. At this rate we're going to run out of these damn obsolote flying coffins.

I agree with Epimetheus. They definitely need to upgrade the program, more of the budget should be shifted toward developing a new shuttle and put the ISS on hold until we have a safe way of getting astronauts to the station.

Even if they kept the current design but built a new shuttle using new materials discovered since the 70's and upgraded the entire hull it would not be asking for too much.

Godspeed, Discovery.

The space shuttle is the most complicated thing that man has ever made.. You cannot expect it to be flawless everytime so stop complaining people!.. I live in Florida and It's pretty cool seeing them launch from my house.. It lights up the entire sky at night so awesome!

If anyone's interested in how NASA prepared for the re-entry here:

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/graphics/retu...ce/flash_07.htm

:/ at the Anti-NASA/Shuttle comments. These people love what they're doing (and definately know what they're doing). Don't tell them that their projects are death traps.

Epimetheus hit the nail on the head, the Shuttle program should have ended years ago, but NASA probably won't retire the fleet until they either lose another shuttle, or they get one of them stranded at the ISS.

Here is one thing that I don't understand about the falling foam issue, if the only prblem with it is that foam is falling off of the fuel tank, then why don't they just put a layer of metal over the foam? They're spending millions of dollars on a single tank anyways, so why wouldn't that work?

Erh. We're UTC+1 at the moment, not +0.

I wish people would use UTC rather than GMT. GMT != 'The time in Britain'.

Back on topic, I'll be watching it certainly. I think BBC1 have live coverage.

586343009[/snapback]

everywhere in britain still uses GMT, that includes the BBC ;) so get with the times mate :laugh:

its at 09:46 BST (0846 GMT)

[oh and GMT is not always the time in britain, during the summer months we are GMT+1]

Edited by rob.derosa
Someone need to invent internet time so we all have a idea of when stuff is happening lwhens this in the uk?

586341760[/snapback]

Shuttle landing delayed

Low clouds prompted NASA to wave off Discovery's first scheduled landing opportunity today, the first space shuttle landing attempt since the Columbia disaster. A second opportunity to land is expected for 6:22 a.m. EDT at the Florida landing site.

Should be 11:32 a.m. UK time. :laugh:

Yeah woke up at 4:20 to get myself all ready to find out it was delayed (:angry: only becuase of sleep, I know they HAD to for safety). Hope the 6:22 AM EDT is a go or I'll be one depressed dude. I saw some report on CNN that the next available slot after that, which is approximately 90 minutes after isn't possible because of orbital mechanics (the dude who covers NASA for CNN Miles O'Brien or something said so).

edit> They're going to make the call soon. Damn! Waved off for 24 hours. That sucks.

Edited by bigbluepride35

There isn't too much danger for the shuttle as far as being stuck in space because of weather.

There are many places in the world where it can land. There are several airports, all over the world, with runways that can accomodate a landing shuttle.

If they have to come down, they will have a place to land no matter what.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!