Space Shuttle Discovery


Recommended Posts

KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, Florida (CNN) -- "Unstable" weather conditions prompted NASA to scrub Discovery's scheduled landing Monday, the first space shuttle landing attempt since the Columbia disaster.

The next opportunity is scheduled for Tuesday at 5:07 a.m. ET at the Florida landing site.

"We've been working hard on this," said entry flight director Leroy Cain at Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas. "There continues to be a lower layer of clouds from 400 to 500 feet that's been scattered all evening."

The cloud cover, although within NASA's safety limits for landing, was enough to make mission controllers uncomfortable about attempting a Monday touchdown in Florida.

Commander Eileen Collins was given the scrub order from mission controllers at 5:05 a.m. ET.

"We just can't get comfortable with the stability of the situation for this particular opportunity. So we're going to officially wave you off for 24 hours," Ken Ham said at mission control.

"OK, Houston we copy that. We'll be a wave off for today," Collins responded.

Officials would prefer to land at Kennedy Space Center to avoid the inconvenience of flying the shuttle back to its launch site from alternative landing strips in California or New Mexico.

Mark Polanksi, a pilot during a 2001 mission aboard the shuttle Atlantis, said the waiting is easier for orbiting crew members than it is for their families.

"It's much harder for people on the ground," Polanski said. "Loved ones don't know when their people are coming home."

Polanski and astronaut Nicholas Patrick are assigned to a shuttle mission aboard Discovery in 2006. Patrick said the orbiting astronauts have more than enough supplies to keep them until they can return.

"In between powering down today and preparing for Tuesday's landing attempt, they'll be taking care of some housekeeping and perhaps finding more time to be looking out the windows," Patrick said.

Following the decision to remain in space another day, Discovery received permission to re-open its payload bay doors and began powering down systems that had been poised to fire engines to take it out of orbit.

During Tuesday's de-orbital burn, the spacecraft's engines will ignite for about three minutes, slowing it enough to begin its fiery journey through the atmosphere.

Discovery's pilot, astronaut James Kelly, said Sunday that returning to Earth is much like riding on a runaway train.

"Once we start re-entering the atmosphere, you start seeing the plasma go by the windows," Kelly said, referring to colorful, super-hot gases.

It's "a very exciting and exhilarating process that ends with being at home," said Kelly.

Though it launches into orbit like a rocket, the shuttle returns to Earth like an airplane. As it begins to transition from space, computer-controlled jets guide the shuttle. Once the atmosphere thickens, Discovery's wing flaps and rudder steer it much like they would a conventional aircraft.

When the shuttle slows below the speed of sound, it triggers a sonic boom that alerts Florida residents that the spacecraft is returning home.

It was during re-entry in February 2003 that Columbia broke apart, killing its seven crew members.

Investigators later determined that super-heated gases that normally surround the orbiter as it returns to Earth entered Columbia's left wing through a hole created when insulating foam fell from the shuttle's fuel tank and struck the vehicle during launch.

The Columbia break-up left a trail of debris across Texas and Louisiana and resulted in vows from NASA that tighter safety precautions would be taken on future trips -- and that the problem of falling foam would be solved.

Under new guidelines, Discovery will follow a trajectory that takes it largely over ocean.

Beginning with an orbital speed of about 17,500 mph, the shuttle is scheduled to enter the atmosphere over the Pacific Ocean and glide over Nicaragua, Cuba and the Gulf of Mexico.

It then should pass over Florida's Lake Okeechobee and, moving at about 220 mph, touch down at the Kennedy Space Center.

Mission STS-114 largely was designed to improve safety on future shuttle journeys, although the program has been suspended while NASA investigates its failure to solve the problem of foam falling from the shuttle's external liquid fuel tank during launch.

Video from the July 26 launch showed debris falling from the fuel tank, but NASA said it did not appear to have struck the orbiter. Once in space, Discovery's crew used cameras to scrutinize the craft's exterior for possible damage that might pose a threat during re-entry.

The shuttle spent most of the mission docked to the international space station, delivering much-needed supplies and performing maintenance on the outpost.

Astronaut Steve Robinson performed an unprecedented shuttle repair mission by plucking two pieces of filler material protruding between tiles on Discovery's underside. NASA wanted them removed to ensure they wouldn't overheat, damaging Discovery's belly during re-entry.

Mission controllers said an additional spacewalk to fix a damaged thermal blanket under one of the cockpit windows was not necessary.

New Florida arrival set for 5:07 a.m. ET Tuesday

Source CNN

There isn't too much danger for the shuttle as far as being stuck in space because of weather.

There are many places in the world where it can land.  There are several airports, all over the world, with runways that can accomodate a landing shuttle.

If they have to come down, they will have a place to land no matter what.

586343888[/snapback]

They said tomorrow they'll have opportunities at Kennedy in FL and Edwards AFB in CA and a shot in Mexico (forgot the name of the airfield). Two shots a piece at FL and CA and don't know how many at the Mexican site.

There was low cloud cover that concerned them.

With all the repair they had to do,...? I'm a bit hopeless.:((

586344976[/snapback]

Well in the past they probably would have never even KNOWN about half of the problems and landed fine. We have to remember this was the most videotaped and scrutinized flight ever. They've landed in the past with that filler material sticking out. And maybe I'm wrong but wasn't the procedure to remove the filler the only repair to the shuttle itself? Weren't the rest planned repairs to the space station?

O and https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=355388&st=45

Edited by bigbluepride35
They said tomorrow they'll have opportunities at Kennedy in FL and Edwards AFB in CA and a shot in Mexico (forgot the name of the airfield). Two shots a piece at FL and CA and don't know how many at the Mexican site.

586344460[/snapback]

I believe it is something along the lines of Whitesboro? I also think they have one shot at landing there, but am not positive. I woke up at 2am CDT to watch and don't remember everthing I saw :laugh:

I believe it is something along the lines of Whitesboro? I also think they have one shot at landing there, but am not positive. I woke up at 2am CDT to watch and don't remember everthing I saw :laugh:

586345068[/snapback]

Whitesand Space Harbor, they just said on NASA TV and yeah it's only one shot there and at Cali. My mistake earlier.

edit> Nope, I was right originally, TWO shots at Cali, too. Just saw it on NASA TV.

Edited by bigbluepride35
Whitesand Space Harbor, they just said on NASA TV and yeah it's only one shot there and at Cali. My mistake earlier.

edit> Nope, I was right originally, TWO shots at Cali, too. Just saw it on NASA TV.

586345185[/snapback]

Not Mexico, NEW Mexico. My mistake. I was thinking to myself "Why on earth would Mexico have a landing stirp accessible to a space shuttle. And it's 2 at Kennedy, 2 at Edwards, and 1 at Whitesand. Thank you NASA TV.

Sorry about the double post :blush: I thought it was too long to edit my last one.

i think they'll no-go the second one too. i'm sure they're going to land in cali.

they said the reason is that a rain drop hitting the shuttle at over 400 mph can put a dent in the tiles. that's potentially thousands of tiles that would need replacing after landing. to me, it's a good idea to be more cautious about this.

one thing that i find kind of interesting is all of these people are freaking out about the safety concerns and how horrible nasa is for the disasters such as challenger and columbia and how the entire shuttle program needs to be redone and/or shut down and a whole new program needs to be thought of...

all of this, while at the same time, the current administration is not being very generous at all with the funding to NASA, probably because they're busy spending somewhere approaching $200 billion on Iraq, oh and by the way we happen to be approaching 2,000 casualties of american soldiers over there....

i really dont like getting all politcally jazzed up too often, but i couldn't help myself on this one...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!