A huge blow to Messenger Plus!


Recommended Posts

And as far the sponsorware, seems stupid what some antispyware programs say are ok or not, as the Plus! sponsorware in my opinion, is no different than installing MSN Toolbar or Google Toolbar, etc. etc.

586377959[/snapback]

Ahh, but there's a thin line between toolbars that can be installed WITH YOUR BLOODY PERMISSION, and ones that aren't. In Messenger Plus's case, technically you're giving it permission to install the spyware (ahem, I'm not calling it a 'sponsor.' alright?), even if you're too stupid to click on anything with the words 'agree', 'ok' and 'next'. After all, you get the same consequences as clicking on anything you see in Internet Explorer, especially those ****ing ads.

On the topic of toolbars, maybe people should bitch at why the option to install MSN Toolbar is checked BY DEFAULT in the MSN Messenger setup. (Not to mention the option to make msn.com your home page, even though my homepage is msn.ca) At least in Messenger Plus you get enough warnings.

Sign the Petition to have your say: http://www.petitiononline.com/msgplus/

586378234[/snapback]

Patch, just a quick question.

How did you feel about that last beta leak of Plus!, .. and were you really bothered that much by it? BTW how did it get leaked?

BTW: That petition is the most stupid thing Ive ever seen.

No names, emails, only 19 clicks, ... and do you honestly think thats going to get Microsofts attention? Lol.

I heard that Patcho was in talks with Microsoft and he was considering getting rid of the sponsor program and adding the MSN Toolbar in replacement. Since I heard that tho, I have not heard anything else

586378294[/snapback]

Where did you hear that? Your mind?

Patch, just a quick question.

How did you feel about that last beta leak of Plus!, .. and were you really bothered that much by it? BTW how did it get leaked?

586378255[/snapback]

It did bother me a lot yeah, simply because this version is not ready yet and has some important bugs. If it's being distributed too widely (doesn't seem to be the case so far) then more people will complain more about problems associated with it and think things like the tabbed chats feature are final when they are not.

It got leaked the same old fashion way. A tester sent it to a friend, who sent it to a friend, who sent it to a friend who didn't care to understand the damage it could produce. Future beta versions will be tagged to trace leakers more efficiently but for now, this non-sense with MS Anti-Spyware has the priority.

I don't mean to flame and I know a lot of people love the program, but I personally think it's a piece of bloated crap. I only tried it once, and although I do not remember the version, it had no clear warning on the install process about the spyware/adware/sugar-coat-as-you-like-**** included with it. I was royally ****ed and never touched it again.

Now despite my personal opinion, this decision by Microsoft will certainly affect the end-user that knows little of what is going on the PC and trust the program to detect threats. On the other hand, these same users are more likely to install the spyware included on MessengerPlus! without noticing.

To me, any app that included apyware in anyway must be reported for the end user. If it's the end user option to keep it on the PC or not, despite the install options, then oh well.

One more thing... if people love Patchou's work so much, why don't he set up a donation system and takes off the spyware options from the installer?

No it does not. It installs a toolbar on IE, adds a few favorities, and gives random popups. That is not totaly screwing up your system...

586377435[/snapback]

dude are you on crack????

WTF are you saying, that spyware that comes with crap software that slows your system down. I hate mssnger plus, it sucks bit time...

all you really need is a simple ad blocker.. messenger is ok without all that crap anyways

I do agree with some of the above posts. A lot of ppl do not know how to use computers and when installing a program, most people would click on ACCEPT (because mostly all programs u click accept to install it) so it is a bit tricky. They should read it first, but how many ppl honestly do? I think Patcho should take away the sponsor program, BUT add a donation feature. Like ask people to donate something after u install like, like Bit Torrent. It would be a lot easier.

messenger plus sucks there is no reason to have a VERY tricky wording that only the LEET know about to avoid SPYWARE... I say ban it... how many pop ups does the messenger page have.. 10+ ???  total crap

586378360[/snapback]

Uh huh. I don't need you to use the word 'suck' in TWO posts. :argh::

I don't think it's the '1337' that can avoid spyware. Instead I think it's the 'r374rd3d idi075' that cannot understand these points:

1) The next button IS DISABLED for three or so seconds, and a big ass warning is right there, under the directory selection page. Now for those who click next, next, and next, I think they should get the message when they cannot click this Next button.

2) An image is right there of what you're gonna install.

3) Neither the 'I agree' or 'I disagree' radio buttons are checked.

4) No tricky wording is there. The toolbar's license agreement is there, but even the dumbest user should be aware they're installing a toolbar by realizing THERE IS A ****ING screenshot of the toolbar on the installer page.

And about the popups, WTF?

And ban?:boo:: I would rather ban these uneducated idiots clicking on everything they see on their screen from using such software, but that's pushing it.

I could understand if you're ranting from previous experiences, as I believe Plus! used to NOT automatically disable the next button and give you a warning, but things have changed.

Im sorry to see that Patch is having problems with people keeping his betas under wraps ...

So, ... I decided to ask him if I could test for him.

Here is my reply. :laugh:

lol, I'm really sorry about that. When the beta downloads will be more secure, I'll accept new applications. At that time, just mail me at [email protected] .

And here is part of my response.

Will do.

I am testing your betas anyway. I just wanted it to be official. Lol!

It is actually sad when tursted beta testers go and leak stuff to the public before the product is ready. The end user then ends up installing it, mucking up his system, removing the beta, starting a thread on NeoWin about how bad the program sucks, and all for what? Because you can't just test the thing like you were entrusted to do, and let the developer decided when it's right.

It would be like seeing all the rough cuts of your fave sound track, or movie and listening to them for a long time, then spreading the word about how RAW it was.

Sorry to hear about that Patch.

As for the MS problem, I think a trip to MS, and talks with reps there should honestly clear a lot of that up. However, why did you chose to go with that particular spyware advertiser? Just currious. I mean, the software bundler HAs caused a lot of problems for a lot of people. Me included. Once it seemed to self replicate, and took Hitman Pro 2 just to get rid of the damn thing.

As far as having MS block Plus!, ... I think there are so many programs out there that are packaged like yours but actually DO cause harm, that its hard for an anti-spyware program to pick and choose the good guys from the bad. Can you imagine the liability? rant rant ...

:rolleyes:

As for the MS problem, I think a trip to MS, and talks with reps there should honestly clear a lot of that up. However, why did you chose to go with that particular spyware advertiser? Just currious. I mean, the software bundler HAs caused a lot of problems for a lot of people. Me included. Once it seemed to self replicate, and took Hitman Pro 2 just to get rid of the damn thing.

586378458[/snapback]

You did it the hard way.

How to uninstall ad-ware/sponsor

And for everyone who looks at this thread, it is Adware (A trimmed down version). Not spyware.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I like the show more options. The only problem with it is that it's not always in a consistent spot in the menu. If the copy/paste/cut, happens to show on top, then more option is the last in the menu. But if copy/paste/cut happens to show on the bottom, then more options is before the copy/paste/cut. But I do like the more options because it hides the stuff that I rarely use. But I would like to choose what it is or isn't hiding. That would make it better.
    • I wonder if "put it back the way it was for decades" ever crossed their minds? 🤣
    • Rescind the stupid "Show more options" in context menus and just give us the full menu instead of adding more steps to get to what we want. The "simpler by default" makes me think they'll go in the opposite direction. Every context menu should have a configure button so you can pick and choose what options should be shown, I know you can do that with some registry fu but that shouldn't be required.
    • This is why competition must exist. Finally, pressure is mounting on Microsoft to move in the right direction.
    • Microsoft is making Windows 11's context menus faster, simpler, and configurable by Taras Buria Five years ago, Windows 11 introduced redesigned context menus, offering users a simpler, more modern design. However, customers quickly discovered that the new menus leave a lot to be desired. Many are unhappy with performance (they are really slow), while others dislike the double-layed design, where many options are hidden behind the "Show more options" button. In addition, over the years, menus became cluttered and overloaded. While Microsoft has already fixed plenty of pain points across Windows 11, context menus remain mostly unchanged. Fortunately, Microsoft is finally listening. Marcus Ash, Design and Research Lead for Windows at Microsoft, responded to a tweet on X, confirming that the company is working on fixing Windows 11's context menus. Reworked context menus are supposed to be faster, simpler by default, and "configurable to what you use most." What the latter means is unknown, just like whether Microsoft plans to keep the classic menu alongside the modern one, but according to Marcus, the wait should finally be over soon, as he promised to "share our approach soon." Improved context menus will most likely appear first in Windows 11 preview builds in the Experimental Channel. While we wait for Microsoft to release them, you can try fixing context menus on your PC with a simple tool called Windows 11 Context Menu Manager. It lets you disable entries you do not need, not only cleaning up context menus, but also making them significantly faster. Microsoft has already improved Windows 11's Start menu and taskbar, so hopefully it will address user criticism of the context menu as well. Stay tuned for new Windows 11 preview builds, which usually arrive every Friday.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Carru_123 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      251
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      67
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!