A huge blow to Messenger Plus!


Recommended Posts

[quote name='Mx?' date='Aug 15 2005, 00:19':sleep:: No I just don't like spyware on my PC. I use MsgPlus! all the time and I never install the spyware, it's a great app, but I have seen the spyware. Like other spyware it downloads more, etc, and for a noob it can be quite destructive.

586377503[/snapback]

Well my mate installed it, he is a computer n00b to the max, he managed to get rid of it, but yer, i still agree, alot of n00bs will die from it, but i dont think most will care.

I think Microsoft classed Messenger Plus! as a serious threat because it come bundled with spyware. Any software that has spyware in it whether it has the option not to install it, is treated as a serious or moderate threat because Microsoft understands (and I) that there are lots of people that are not experienced with computers and wants a computer that works with no problems or trouble. The option to install spyware might be accidently checked and that's what concerned Microsoft.

People don't read what's on the screen. They just click Next, Next, Next, Finish until the program is installed. I think they (software developers) need a new concept of installing software safely to force people to read and acknowledge what they are installing and what will go with it.

I think Microsoft classed Messenger Plus! as a serious threat because it come bundled with spyware. Any software that has spyware in it whether it has the option not to install it, is treated as a serious or moderate threat because Microsoft understands (and I) that there are lots of people that are not experienced with computers and wants a computer that works with no problems or trouble. The option to install spyware might be accidently checked and that's what concerned Microsoft.

People don't read what's on the screen. They just click Next, Next, Next, Finish until the program is installed. I think they (software developers) need a new concept of installing software safely to force people to read and acknowledge what they are installing and what will go with it.

586377553[/snapback]

Yep. I think thats right. I don't think Microsoft really cares much about the application itself, but what its threat is.

Like if Microsoft really hated Patchou, why did they pay for him to go to that MSN event?

I think Microsoft classed Messenger Plus! as a serious threat because it come bundled with spyware. Any software that has spyware in it whether it has the option not to install it, is treated as a serious or moderate threat because Microsoft understands (and I) that there are lots of people that are not experienced with computers and wants a computer that works with no problems or trouble. The option to install spyware might be accidently checked and that's what concerned Microsoft.

People don't read what's on the screen. They just click Next, Next, Next, Finish until the program is installed. I think they (software developers) need a new concept of installing software safely to force people to read and acknowledge what they are installing and what will go with it.

586377553[/snapback]

You got it in one. So while all others are up in arms going "omg m$ hate patchou, omg omg", you got exactly right :)

That really sucks, but I can't give any sympathy to anyone who does manage to install the spyware while installing, the screen where it asks if you want to install it or not, it shows a shot of the toolbar, and it has 2 options, I agree or I refuse, and neither are checked by default. Even on the screen before that, theres a little blab about how the next screen asks you to install the toolbar, and tells you you don't have to install it, and you can't click next on that one for a few seconds. It is just too much for you to miss.

Hasn't Patchou already removed the feature that disables ads in MSN Messenger? If so there is no reason to target him. Still, after that other issue (was it Claria being downgraded) I'm not surprised... it's just a shame Microsoft has to use AntiSpyware to put [seemingly unfair] pressure on software makers.

but guys, hopefully someone can confirm this for me, but the msgplus.exe file isn't causing the spyware. if they chose to install the spyware (accidently or not) other files will be created that will be responsible for it, which MS AS should target.

Just to make sure the discussions continues in the right direction... the big problem mess.be is talking about in this post is the fast that msgplus.exe is considered to be a threat everytime it launches at boot time. This .exe CANNOT install the sponsor, wether or not your agreed to it during the setup. If anything was to be detected as potentially harmful, it should be the setup itself, not an exe that does nothing but hook into Messenger.

Targeting msgplus.exe us thge same as targeting any other .exe on your computer. Any exe is potentially dangerous as it's designed to run code on your computer. The debate here is not if the installation of Messenger Plus! and its sponsor should be detected, it's about a program that's wrongully accused of being a threat. Blocking msgplus.exe to run won't remove the sponsor if you installed it and if you click on their Remove button, you get rid of the uninstaller as well which is just a bad thing as it leaves you with no good alternative to remove the sponsor itself afterwards.

Just to make sure the discussions continues in the right direction... the big problem mess.be is talking about in this post is the fast that msgplus.exe is considered to be a threat everytime it launches at boot time. This .exe CANNOT install the sponsor, wether or not your agreed to it during the setup. If anything was to be detected as potentially harmful, it should be the setup itself, not an exe that does nothing but hook into Messenger.

Targeting msgplus.exe us thge same as targeting any other .exe on your computer. Any exe is potentially dangerous as it's designed to run code on your computer. The debate here is not if the installation of Messenger Plus! and its sponsor should be detected, it's about a program that's wrongully accused of being a threat. Blocking msgplus.exe to run won't remove the sponsor if you installed it and if you click on their Remove button, you get rid of the uninstaller as well which is just a bad thing as it leaves you with no good alternative to remove the sponsor itself afterwards.

586377827[/snapback]

:o Is this the real Patchou? :unsure: Mods? Can you verify :rofl:

Just to make sure the discussions continues in the right direction... the big problem mess.be is talking about in this post is the fast that msgplus.exe is considered to be a threat everytime it launches at boot time. This .exe CANNOT install the sponsor, wether or not your agreed to it during the setup. If anything was to be detected as potentially harmful, it should be the setup itself, not an exe that does nothing but hook into Messenger.

alternative to remove the sponsor itself afterwards.

586377827[/snapback]

Quiet patch.

This has nothing to do with you. :p

Seriously, the installer has made it uber clear already, noobs or not, they know how to read at least? Well, if they don't even bother to read in the first place, so it's Patchou's fault? I'll be laughing if they did businesses and signed T&C without reading. Oh yea, the sponsor program is not even in the long T&C. It's in a dedicated part of the installer.

Seriously, the installer has made it uber clear already, noobs or not, they know how to read at least? Well, if they don't even bother to read in the first place, so it's Patchou's fault? I'll be laughing if they did businesses and signed T&C without reading. Oh yea, the sponsor program is not even in the long T&C. It's in a dedicated part of the installer.

586377902[/snapback]

Well yes and no. I agree it's down to the user to check what they're doing before they click "next" but then how many people here read the full T&C's when they install something?

To be honest this is Patchou's software, if he wants put spyware on it, let him. No ones forcing anyone to use the software.

How is messenger plus spyware! Its just because it modifies one of their programs, I think. They should just leave it alone.

586377940[/snapback]

No I don't think you understand. MessengerPlus comes with an optional ad-aware bundle. Users get the option to install the spyware. Microsoft are now calling the entire software spyware.

hooking into messenger and playing about with it would look suspicous to any good antispyware solution.

586377935[/snapback]

Agreed. It's most likely their heuristics detecting a program piggybacking on another... and, as usual, everyone turns it against Microsoft, because we all know they're the most evil organization around.

Funny how so many people say they hate Messenger Plus! when it consumes amost no system resources at all, in fact I doubt anyone has a process that uses less, also other than seeing "Plus!" in the MSN Messenger menu on contact list and convo window, you could hardly even tell it's there, so it definitely doesn't add any bloat, but the features are endless. Weird.

Pretty much the only reason I use Plus! though, is to change the names of contacts on the main window, cuz of idiots that put all sorts of crap where their name is supposed to be.

And as far the sponsorware, seems stupid what some antispyware programs say are ok or not, as the Plus! sponsorware in my opinion, is no different than installing MSN Toolbar or Google Toolbar, etc. etc. I remember back in the old days when toolbars exactly like the one with Plus! were the big craze, everyone thought they were cool, lol. Not me, but lots of people I've heard of installed them on purpose, lol.

Having Plus! is like a Pro version of Messenger, like the difference between XP Home and XP Pro, as far as I'm concerned. Plus! is very very handy.

XP Pro, and XP home are nearly identical.  :rolleyes:

586377968[/snapback]

Yep, of course. I'm very sure I'd know, I use both. Just has a few xtra features that come in handy.

Like having Messenger Plus!, adds a few extra handy features to MSN Messenger.

Well yes and no. I agree it's down to the user to check what they're doing before they click "next" but then how many people here read the full T&C's when they install something?

To be honest this is Patchou's software, if he wants put spyware on it, let him. No ones forcing anyone to use the software.

586377915[/snapback]

It's not hidden AT ALL. There's a big picture of it, and it acts if you would like to install it. I don't think it's very hidden like it used to be (Custimized Install).

msgplus_3.jpg

hooking into messenger and playing about with it would look suspicous to any good antispyware solution.

586377935[/snapback]

Note true, if it was, then most display utilities would be targeted too, a lot of programs use hooking to do a lot of things. MsgPlus.exe is not detected because of its behaviour, it's detected because it's part of Messenger Plus!. Hooking into Messenger is not the issue here, the issue is that they target the wrong program, removing msgplus.exe from your computer will not do anything to improve stability/security/... and thus, there is no reason at all for an anti-spyware program to detect it. If there was such a reason, other products would detect it, not just MS Anti-Spyware (Plus! has been around for more than 4 years already and the sponsor for 2, and the setup is run more than 100,000 times every day. It's not like it's an unknown product that would not "yet" been flagged).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The useful lapdogs  
    • Nobody is buying a PS5 only for playing Until Dawn 2. Their loss.
    • If you actually used it instead of responding like a petulant child you might be surprised. I switched from Google some time ago and have been very satisfied.
    • I am one of the first people to use the DXVK technology. In the channel below you can see some videos that I have made using this technology, including Assassin's Creed Odyssey. https://www.youtube.com/@nahum7995/videos Assassin's Creed Odyssey experienced several bugs and technical issues during its first months after release. It launched with its own fair share of funny but frustrating glitches. I ran it on DXVK 9 days after its release and I played it for many hours but didn't see a single significant bug on Linux. Assassin's Creed Odyssey is widely celebrated for pushing the franchise in bold new directions and specifically for nailing several elements better than any other title in the AC series: Player Choice & Branching Narrative, The Mercenary & Cultist System, Mythological Integration, Overpowered Combat Abilities, Open World Exploration But what I'm trying to point out is that this game wasn't quite playable on most windows systems, until a few months after its release when most of the bugs were fixed. However, on Linux it ran completely flawless from day one, although DXVK had seen little development and refinement at the time. What do you think the situation will be in 2026 now that most bugs and glitches of DXVK have been completely eliminated? This is information from Google about these situations that I am quoting. In many cases, using DXVK (a translation layer that converts DirectX 9, 10, or 11 into Vulkan) can result in more stable frame times and higher performance than native Windows rendering. This happens primarily by bypassing driver overhead and multithreading draw calls that were previously restricted to a single CPU core. Older APIs (like DirectX 9 and 11) are largely single-threaded on the CPU side. DXVK translates these calls to Vulkan, which is highly multi-threaded. This reduces CPU-bound stuttering on weaker processors. In certain cases, GPU manufacturers (especially AMD) have significantly better and more modern Vulkan drivers than they do for legacy DirectX. Vulkan gives developers—and in this case, the translation layer—closer control over how resources are held in VRAM. This can prevent micro-stutters and sudden frame drops during chaotic gameplay. Yes, certain games, particularly older DirectX 9 to 11 titles, can run with fewer crashes on DXVK than on native Windows. By intercepting DirectX draw calls and translating them into the modern, highly efficient Vulkan API, DXVK bypasses the limitations and poor driver support that cause instability in aging game engines. PlayStation 1, PlayStation 2 and PlayStation 3 can be easily and perfectly emulated on Linux. In fact, modern Linux emulators offer high-performance upscaling, widescreen patches, and automatic controller mapping out of the box.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 PlayStation 1/2/3 games look drastically better on Linux thanks to resolution upscaling. Furthermore, it is also a fact that you cannot play many fun games on Windows either, isn't it? - The Nintendo Switch has an extensive library of exclusive games. - PlayStation has an extensive library of exclusive games - Android has "mobile-exclusive" games, meaning they are exclusive to mobile devices (iOS and Android) and aren't available on PC or consoles. And finally, it is also the case that in the next five years there will be games that millions of people will say you absolutely must play and that they want to play this specific game that released a few days ago. However, the other side of this story is that currently, absolutely no one cares that they cannot play these upcoming games right now.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      490
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      232
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      68
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      58
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!