site slowness?


Recommended Posts

either the backups take an extremely long time or something else is causeing the slowness

ive been on before on a sunday and yes its sometimes slow but today its been even slower.

586477886[/snapback]

Well considering they have to backup a few GB's worth of mySQL, I should expect that it does take quite a long time.

Some weeks are slower than others. Not sure why.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/367751-site-slowness/#findComment-586478059
Share on other sites

Could a mod/admin comment on the slowness.

not sure what it is but its very very slow today... tryed a tracert and this is what happened.

C:\Documents and Settings\matt>tracert www.neowin.net

Tracing route to neowin.net [69.93.228.21]

over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.123.254

2 12 ms 5 ms 6 ms 10.222.239.254

3 6 ms 6 ms 5 ms rdng-t2cam1-b-ge910.inet.ntl.com [62.253.122.149

]

4 5 ms 6 ms 6 ms winn-t2core-b-ge-wan62.inet.ntl.com [62.253.121.

149]

5 15 ms 7 ms 11 ms win-bb-b-so-300-0.inet.ntl.com [213.105.174.101]

6 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms pop-bb-a-so-000-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.201]

7 8 ms 9 ms 7 ms 195.50.91.69

8 7 ms 10 ms 7 ms ge-0-3-0-0.bbr2.london1.level3.net [4.68.128.125

]

9 58 ms 59 ms 59 ms ae-0-0.bbr1.dallas1.level3.net [64.159.1.109]

10 93 ms 64 ms 58 ms ge-1-1-55.car3.dallas1.level3.net [4.68.122.134]

11 59 ms 64 ms 58 ms 4.78.220.10

12 59 ms 59 ms 59 ms vl31.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.30]

13 59 ms 59 ms 69 ms dist-vlan21.dsr1-1.dllstx2.theplanet.com [70.85.

127.67]

14 437 ms 72 ms 59 ms car4-1-v2.dllstx2.theplanet.com [12.96.160.49]

15 * * * Request timed out.

16 * <<<< i aborted it here

i know it never shows the final hop but there was a lag spike around hop 14.

is that normal?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/367751-site-slowness/#findComment-586478338
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
    • Can LibreOffice just shut up and worry about themselves and stop comparing themselves? Do we see Microsoft complaining about euro office?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!