Windows Vista Product Editions Revealed


Recommended Posts

What funny is you guys dont think its ok for 500.00 for an ultimate edition of a rich OS vs. hundreds on hundreds for some apps out there

*cough* Adobe *cough*

586505489[/snapback]

The difference is most people *buying* adobe stuff will do so to use it at work and make money, while I'm pretty sure most people buying (or warezing) WV ultimate Ed. will use it mostly to play games.

Expensive tools don't justify expensive toys.

They are pricing themselves out of the market just like NeXT did. I'm sure many people will cough up the dough as they always do but this is a serious mistake that may cost MSFT 15-20% marketshare.

586505587[/snapback]

lol, aristotle-dude you always make the most extreme statments that even you must realise are crazy. 15-20% lol. people dont buy macs cause of the lack of windows software support. it wouldnt matter if they were cheaper and better it wouldnt make any difference and if they were cheap people would think they were rubbish. in fact most of my noob friends already do think macs are bad......

but i do think this is going to increase piracy. people cant bother to steal pro when they have home but have they have home and can upgrade to ultimate i think they will bother to do that. i know i would....

Starter Edition? That's stupid. Only 3 apps simultaneously? :o

I ran more apps than that simulataneously in Windows 3.1

I'll think I'll just get Windows Vista Ultimate when it comes out (somehow :shifty:)

586505322[/snapback]

I think we all get your point, but you couldn't multi-task in 3.1

Price? People pay for Windows? :p

586505448[/snapback]

LMAO

You forgot out the 8th version of Windows.

Windows Vista Pirated Edition

586505472[/snapback]

Well if you calculate correctly then its accually 14 versions (Well 13; who the hell would pirate Starter Edition :p ?

Narrrr! Tha's right me lard! :pirate:

586505495[/snapback]

:devil: :pirate: :devil: :pirate:

This is pointless and really confusing for the average user. What should be done is release 2 versions....then like you did for Media Edition release the other ones quietly for especific systems.

This is pointless and really confusing for the average user.

586505686[/snapback]

No it's not. The average user will never even see most of the options. They'll see Home Basic, Home Premium, and maybe Ultimate. The other ones will be "hidden" away. Do you see average users getting confused by the fact that there is a Windows 2003? No, of course not. It's not out there next to XP, just like the business versions won't be.

lol, aristotle-dude you always make the most extreme statments that even you must realise are crazy. 15-20% lol. people dont buy macs cause of the lack of windows software support. it wouldnt matter if they were cheaper and better it wouldnt make any difference and if they were cheap people would think they were rubbish. in fact most of my noob friends already do think macs are bad......

but i do think this is going to increase piracy. people cant bother to steal pro when they have home but have they have home and can upgrade to ultimate i think they will bother to do that. i know i would....

586505644[/snapback]

Uh.... yeah. Even before this announcement and the announcement of hardware recommendations for Vista, analysts were predicting a rise in market share for Apple of 5% over the next two years.

In case you have been under a rock, Intel macs will support windows in a dual boot situation. The average Joe uses windows because they are not aware of other alternatives. A rise in prices, complicated/confusing tiers of OS editions and steep hardware reqs may cause these same average Joe users to look for alternatives.

A user can just as easily pirate Windows if they have a mac.

I don't think we should take someone with a Vista logo as an avatar too seriously.

:rolleyes:

Why did you ignore the part about MUI? Is it because you don't have a clue what it is or that you do not see the value of it?

I predict that Vista will have an even slower adoption rate than XP had in Corporations. I also predict that mad_onion will be waiting in line outside a store the night before Vista's release.

:laugh:

I use VS,VS.NET at work and we have IBM servers/workstations with Intel P4's in them but you don't see me with an avatar of any of those do you?

;)

I think he ment where did ya'll come up with the $500 for Vista Ultimate Edition....

586505826[/snapback]

Well it could be even more for all we know. I think it's pretty safe to say that it will cost at least around that given the existing pricing of XP and the number of tiers between Pro and Ultimate.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!