Paul's Wrong on Windows Vista Editions


Recommended Posts

Paul Thurrott has posted what he thinks are the editions that Windows Vista will be released in. I don't believe that he has what he thinks he has. Here's why:

    * Too few editions: Several sources tell me that there are over 20 possible editions up for consideration. Paul names too few for his list to be accurate.

    * Too much functionality: Microsoft makes too much on the Tablet edition and the MCE edition without continuing to offer them separately. There's no way they'd only bundle them in some "mega-edition".

    * Too early: Confirmed information from Microsoft official sources tell me that editions are not locked down yet. There is only one edition that is confirmed, but I can't talk about that until Tuesday morning.

I should also note that SKUs will NOT be announced at PDC.

I should note that details are still being worked out for PDC. PR may decide to announce editions at the last minute. As of the time of this posting, this information is correct.

http://www.longhornblogs.com/robert/archiv...9/11/14606.aspx

20 possible editions?? id say the current tiers of windows xp is just about right. a version for the bog standard home user, one for the professional, then the relavent versions for specific devices...

however breaking vista up into more variations is going to confuse the allready confused computer user. if all else fails please just keep one version for the home user to stop mass panic about what version your average joe needs.

What does it matter to you?  Were you planning on buying multiple copies?  Or are you mad that it will a 20-in-1 pirate cd instead of 7-in-1?

586510294[/snapback]

Nice trollish comeback that has nothing to do with what he said. I think most people think 20 different editions would just make it more confusing for the buyers. Also more editions to patch.

I clicked on the topic and thought jokingly to myself that the topic would say there were to be more; thinking no way there would be as many as seven. Oh how wrong was I.

I guess flexibility is good and know microsoft would never release as many as 20 but I still think that all versions should be of the highest standard, not just the ones that the user has had to shelled out for.

why cant they just do a few, this is what i'd do.

Home Edition (for the every day user)

Professional Edition (the same as home but with added features that admin's for example would need)

Server Edition (speaks for itself)

then from there things like tablet and media center would just be home edition with extenders.

What is everyone talking about with this "more editions to patch" crap?  You don't see separate patches for Home and Pro now, do you?  Of course not.  It's the exact same underlying OS, so one patch takes care of both of them.  Vista will be no different.

586510566[/snapback]

What's this talk of "everyone" crap. So far just 2 users of about 14 that said this. You don't see everyone saying this, do you? Of course not.

You know you probably are right, you could just try to be a little less of an ass about correcting things. Do you correct people in real life like this? I sure hope not.

What's this talk of "everyone" crap.  So far just 2 users of about 14 that said this.  You don't see everyone saying this, do you?  Of course not.

You know you probably are right, you could just try to be a little less of an ass about correcting things.  Do you correct people in real life like this?  I sure hope not.

586510615[/snapback]

i was gonna say pretty much the same thing... :laugh:

20????? wtf! i'd be happy with 3, but wtv.

586510064[/snapback]

I think you misunderstood.

I took that to mean they've got 20 possible SKUs, of which they'll pick a few. Not that they're going to ship 20 versions of Windows. That'd be insane.

Nice trollish comeback that has nothing to do with what he said.  I think most people think 20 different editions would just make it more confusing for the buyers.  Also more editions to patch.

586510326[/snapback]

It had everything to do with what he said. He made a statement like 20 editions will somehow make a difference instead of 3, to him.

What about that don't you get?

Nice trollish comeback that has nothing to do with what he said.  I think most people think 20 different editions would just make it more confusing for the buyers.  Also more editions to patch.

586510326[/snapback]

Yup, it will mean more work for MS, and will confuse the heck out of consumers for sure. I know many already who aren't even sure if they should buy Pro or Home for XP, and then they hear about MCE and thats just another thing to tell buyers. Sigh. But I agree 20 versions is a bit much :blink:

I am going to make them up.

- Vista Corporate Edition

- Vista business server

- Vista Web Server

- Vista small office server

- Vista Home office server (maybe containing "Office" and some kind of money management thing)

- Vista Ultimate

- Vista Media Server

- Vista Media Centre

- Vista Gamer

- Vista Professional

- Vista Create (with stuff you get on Macs, like garage band etc, DVD creator, whatever)

- Vista Education Edition (For schools, and the little kids.... ah bless)

- Vista Home Network (Probably much the same as professional but all the prof options are system managed and it has heaps of wizards)

- Vista Home equivalent (Basic Networking, most features but crippled versions)

- Vista OEM (You can bet they are itching to cripple this one)

- Vista Basic (For the poor............ and students)

- Vista Dumb terminal edition (for data entry)

- Vista Third world (super crippled)

Err how many is that.... 18

Ok then.....

Vista U2 edition (everything is black with red buttons)

Vista Harry Potter special edition (wizardry is within every application and OWLtlook email)

I am going to make them up.

- Vista Corporate Edition

- Vista business server

- Vista Web Server

- Vista small office server

- Vista Home office server (maybe containing "Office" and some kind of money management thing)

- Vista Ultimate

- Vista Media Server

- Vista Media Centre

- Vista Gamer

- Vista Professional

- Vista Create (with stuff you get on Macs, like garage band etc, DVD creator, whatever)

- Vista Education Edition (For schools, and the little kids.... ah bless)

- Vista Home Network (Probably much the same as professional but all the prof options are system managed and it has heaps of wizards)

- Vista Home equivalent (Basic Networking, most features but crippled versions)

- Vista OEM (You can bet they are itching to cripple this one)

- Vista Basic (For the poor............ and students)

- Vista Dumb terminal edition (for data entry)

- Vista Third world (super crippled)

Err how many is that.... 18

Ok then.....

Vista U2 edition (everything is black with red buttons)

Vista Harry Potter special edition (wizardry is within every application and OWLtlook email)

586511611[/snapback]

Lol :laugh:

Some people have misunterstood, the article is saying that there are 20 versions under consideration, on which of the 20 they'll pick a few.

Lol :laugh:

Some people have misunterstood, the article is saying that there are 20 versions under consideration, on which of the 20 they'll pick a few.

586511729[/snapback]

ah. ok.

I am sure the harry potter edition will go through. No one need worry about that.

edit: Thats what you get when you can't be bothered to read stuff. You get the wrong end of the stick.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My issue is I can't access the forum on mobile if the site is set to Desktop mode on Vivaldi because it can't complete the Cloud flare am I a bot check! I know this is a Vivaldi issues as it has started happening on all cloud flare check sites, it's so annoying, I've reported it but no fix yet.
    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!