Paul's Wrong on Windows Vista Editions


Recommended Posts

20 Editions sounds a little stupid, no offence and all... Personally, I would just like there to be two editions. Home and Pro, to set apart the grandmas from the gurus. All these extra Media Center, Tablet PC, Starter Edition, are just trash... They're all XP Home or Pro (mostly Pro) with some extra plugins slapped on.

What's this talk of "everyone" crap.  So far just 2 users of about 14 that said this.  You don't see everyone saying this, do you?  Of course not.

You know you probably are right, you could just try to be a little less of an ass about correcting things.  Do you correct people in real life like this?  I sure hope not.

586510615[/snapback]

What's with your negative comments against other users without having anything to add to the thread? I haven't heard anything from you yet that I can actually learn something from, at least now the 2 people who brought up the issue about patching (including yourself) will know that patches are universal and not for each specific edition. Do you correct people in real life like this? I sure hope not.

Now to add to the conversation... it doesn't really matter how many editions there are. If there are 20, they will be very similar and it will just offer more choice to the company or user who needs Windows. Let's say there is two home versions... just get the one that makes most sense to you! If you need Media Center Edition instead, get that. For businesses, if there is a Small Business, Enterprise, Pro, Corporate, or other versions, the companies will know there specific needs and which edition meets those needs. It will never have to affect you as you will never have to make that choice.

Now if there is a seperate Tablet PC Edition and maybe a Power User All-In-One edition, they will be attracting a totally different crowd than the standard Media Center Edition, or the basic Home and fully featured Home Editions.

The average user will only need to make a choice between maybe 2-3 different editions at the most. They cant' just put enterprise level backup utilities or Virtual PC software into the Home or Small Business editions of the OS, as they take time to develop and thus the cost will be more as the needs are more. If you don't need a feature, then you don't even have to look into that particular Edition.

It is pretty narrow minded to say that "OMG 20 EDITIONS!!! I WON'T KNOW WHAT TO CHOOSE AND MY GRANDMA WON'T EITHER!" because the edition you choose will be between only a couple specific choices. It's not like the features overlap alot, it's just a few more items that only specific people may want in each different version, and the features just keep on building up as you go.

What's with your negative comments against other users without having anything to add to the thread? I haven't heard anything from you yet that I can actually learn something from, at least now the 2 people who brought up the issue about patching (including yourself) will know that patches are universal and not for each specific edition. Do you correct people in real life like this? I sure hope not.

586511999[/snapback]

Erm, ok whatever. I was mocking him in the first sentence. Telling him to be less of an ass in the 2nd, but whatever, too bad I can't be the wealth of knowledge that you bring to everybody here. :whistle:

It had everything to do with what he said. He made a statement like 20 editions will somehow make a difference instead of 3, to him.

What about that don't you get?

For the simple fact that when someone goes to their local store to buy a copy of Vista, there won't be 5 different home editions to confuse the hell out of people. That's one reason why too many editions would hurt Vista.

Edited by mufdvr3669
What does it matter to you?  Were you planning on buying multiple copies?  Or are you mad that it will a 20-in-1 pirate cd instead of 7-in-1?

586510294[/snapback]

plz stfu....he didn't say anything about pirate or **** like that...

why did you write that reply anyway? you love to be a flamebait??

personaly i think it should be:

Starter

N

Home(with added domain ability)

Home Gamer

Pro

Pro Developer(includes the gamer addition also for people that do game dev)

Enterprise... aditional tools to run say a limited server/domain and a little extra cool add-ins

Erm, ok whatever.  I was mocking him in the first sentence.  Telling him to be less of an ass in the 2nd, but whatever, too bad I can't be the wealth of knowledge that you bring to everybody here. :whistle:

586512017[/snapback]

I just really don't think you are in the position to flood the thread with garbage over the word "everybody" when the guy was just clearing up something that was confusing you and others, and possibly those who didn't post but had those same thoughts. My posts are always the same... I like to thoroughly explain my opinons of things.

plz stfu....he didn't say anything about pirate or **** like that...

why did you write that reply anyway? you love to be a flamebait??

Looks like you bit the bait :no:

if there were less version that means ms can focus more energy into fixing the bugs in it. More version makes it harder to cordinate.

586512375[/snapback]

Uhh no that doesn't make sense.

The OS is exactly the same, the only difference between versions is either an extension (like Media Center, which is just a program basically, or Tablet PC), or else in the business versions you have some administration things and the ability to run a server directly out of Windows. Those are the only differences between versions, just one or two main features that makes no difference to patching or finding bugs whatsoever because the patches are UNIVERSAL. There isn't seperate patches for each edition, because there is so little difference they are the same OS with a couple extensions.

Maybe they are just taking all their products and making them variations of the name with "Vista" in it. Like a Vista Starter, Vista Home, Vista Pro, Vista Web Server, Vista Server Standard, Vista Server Enterprise, Vista Embedded, Vista Tablet PC Edition, Vista Media Center Edition...blah blah blah like all their current windows variants.

Maybe they are just taking all their products and making them variations of the name with "Vista" in it.  Like a Vista Starter, Vista Home, Vista Pro, Vista Web Server, Vista Server Standard, Vista Server Enterprise, Vista Embedded, Vista Tablet PC Edition, Vista Media Center Edition...blah blah blah like all their current windows variants.

586512401[/snapback]

Ya, that's the whole point :p

What else would they be called?

What does it matter to you? Were you planning on buying multiple copies? Or are you mad that it will a 20-in-1 pirate cd instead of 7-in-1?

I think you're the one p*ssed about the fact that there would be a 20 in 1 pirate cd instead of a 7 in 1 judging from how you come to this thread acting like an ass towards someone. The guy didn't even mention pirating in his post. You're the idiot who brought that up. So take the **** out of your ass and STFU and if you want to be an ass in all your posts then just take them somewhere else.

I think you're the one p*ssed about the fact that there would be a 20 in 1 pirate cd instead of a 7 in 1 judging from how you come to this thread acting like an ass towards someone. The guy didn't even mention pirating in his post. You're the idiot who brought that up. So take the **** out of your ass and STFU and if you want to be an ass in all your posts then just take them somewhere else.

586513891[/snapback]

Ooo, I can see a raised warning level coming...

I just really don't think you are in the position to flood the thread with garbage over the word "everybody" when the guy was just clearing up something that was confusing you and others, and possibly those who didn't post but had those same thoughts. My posts are always the same...

586512079[/snapback]

If you would of read my post and understood it I wasn't flooding the thread with garbage over the word everybody, I was mocking him because he was such an ass in his reply. He could of simply answered that patching wouldn't be affected, or something on a more grown up level instead of his 12 year old little comeback.

Now to add to the conversation... it doesn't really matter how many editions there are. If there are 20, they will be very similar and it will just offer more choice to the company or user who needs Windows. Let's say there is two home versions... just get the one that makes most sense to you! If you need Media Center Edition instead, get that. For businesses, if there is a Small Business, Enterprise, Pro, Corporate, or other versions, the companies will know there specific needs and which edition meets those needs. It will never have to affect you as you will never have to make that choice.

Now if there is a seperate Tablet PC Edition and maybe a Power User All-In-One edition, they will be attracting a totally different crowd than the standard Media Center Edition, or the basic Home and fully featured Home Editions.

The average user will only need to make a choice between maybe 2-3 different editions at the most. They cant' just put enterprise level backup utilities or Virtual PC software into the Home or Small Business editions of the OS, as they take time to develop and thus the cost will be more as the needs are more. If you don't need a feature, then you don't even have to look into that particular Edition.

It is pretty narrow minded to say that "OMG 20 EDITIONS!!! I WON'T KNOW WHAT TO CHOOSE AND MY GRANDMA WON'T EITHER!" because the edition you choose will be between only a couple specific choices. It's not like the features overlap alot, it's just a few more items that only specific people may want in each different version, and the features just keep on building up as you go.

Umm, nothing very insightful in those comments. :whistle:

If you would of read my post and understood it I wasn't flooding the thread with garbage over the word everybody, I was mocking him because he was such an ass in his reply.  He could of simply answered that patching wouldn't be affected, or something on a more grown up level instead of his 12 year old little comeback. 

Umm, nothing very insightful in those comments. :whistle:

586514555[/snapback]

Yes but yours is. MY MIND HAS BEEN OPENED, I SEE THE LIGHT :woot: :rolleyes:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!