What alloys?


Recommended Posts

cool rims, and in response to the power thing...

its 8v.... sooooo lol. i think if u could get someone who really knows cars, then maybe a turbo could be do able, even tho the enginge is naturally aspritaed..

if not. 50cc shot of NOs could be a idea, but that blows the engine up like no tommorow. lol

586633506[/snapback]

Anything else?

Dont really fancy a Turbo since its a N/A Engine. And NOS... I need my Engine in one piece lol.

Anything else you can think off? New Airfilter/hose/box? They do much BHP wise?

keep it stock, pffft it aint gonna take many mpg off unless he really tunes it lol.

id look into seeing if a ECU upgrade / the car is chippable.

Air filters + new hoses will make it sound like its pushing 300bhp, so unless u want your car sounding a bit on teh sports car side i'd leave them alone.

Mainly Turbo, Intercooler, and a Upgraded ECU would do the trick, but its finding the parts...

Also you could round off the pistols to give a bit more ooomphh, not so more more BHP, but it would help give it a bit more pull... i think.. :rofl:

Wheels look good, just don't go (too) rice

cool rims, and in response to the power thing...

its 8v.... sooooo lol. i think if u could get someone who really knows cars, then maybe a turbo could be do able, even tho the enginge is naturally aspritaed..

if not. 50cc shot of NOs could be a idea, but that blows the engine up like no tommorow. lol

586633506[/snapback]

Yes, because nitrous oxide on a nonmodded car is a good idea.

I'm not sure that the old turbo engine is really that suitable for the MK2 Punto (they switched from a 1.4 turbo to a 1.8 16v in the MK2 Punto).

In all reality, there's probably no economical way to get 50% more power from th 8v 1.2. Certainly, you could swap out the 8v for a 1.2 16v, 1.6 16v or the 1.8 16v from another Punto / Stilo / whatever (the 2.0 may be the same as well), as they all use the same engine design which have the same engine mounts and so on. From memory, the 1.8 16v is a taller engine and may need changes to the shell.

Whether that is a financially wise choice is another matter, as buying a HGT may make more sense.

The old Fiat and Lancia engines that the Uno and X1/9 had all shared the same roots and in the X1/9 it was common to swap out the 1.5 for a Choma / Lancia 2.0 8v, 16v or turbo engine.

An airfilter, etc will add maybe 10bhp

Not economically, no.

Swapping the engine for a bigger one from a breakers would be the cheapest option, as it wouldn't be that difficult to swap.

However, buying a car with a bigger engine would make more sense, as your insurance would go up massively if you were to swap the engine (and technically even an air filter may be considered to be a modification to your insurance company)

Ive been looking at some Induction Kits to replace the current one which I belive is far from ideal for many reasons.

Pilsbury, you seem to know your stuff? What Filters would you recommend?

I've been looking at this one:-

Info Page:

http://www.knfilters.com/search/product.aspx?Prod=57-0455

Install Guide (PDF) Fits perfectly for my car...Looks good too.

http://www.filterpower.co.uk/kn_induction/files/57-0455.pdf

K & N will possibly give you a bit more power, but, it will be minimal.

It will make the car sound a bit more sporty though.

586683987[/snapback]

Talking about a 3-6 more BHP Max?

Any other Air filters that can give a bit more do you know of?

How does it make the car sound more sporty?

very tidy car mate ! well done!

your best bet is k&n filter but really there isnt much more you can do.

the filter could give u a 8+ increase if your lucky probably less tho. Your driving a 1.2 mate 90bhp just isnt going to happen :( spend your money on other mods like getting it lowered, a bodykit how about an ice install ? nice headunit + amps and subs etc, window tints, some new interior accesories like gearnobs and handbreakcovers

i also wouldnt bother with engine mods etc cos your insurance is going to skyrocket! leave the preformance mods till after your 21!

i get my first car today 1.6 focus but iam paying a grand insurance :(

gd luck! its looking gd already :)

Yeh, I think all im going to do is replace the Induction Kit... About ?80-90 or so.

Also going to get some Black rear lights and then leave it at that really.

What are some really good websites with decent prices?

These Rear Lights

FI23L69S.jpg

?151.95 from http://www.motechdirect.co.uk/content.asp?...10006&inc=ultra

And the Air Filter also

Fiat Punto ll 1.2i 8v Mpi 10/1999-2003 57-0455 ?72.34

From the same site.

Ive seen the lights for ?99 at this site http://www.gbkperformance.co.uk/gbk/index....products_id=425

But the site seems very new, not sure I could trust it? Damn cheap though...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      455
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!