World of Warcraft Is Spyware!


Recommended Posts

Didn't Blizzard get in trouble a few years back for acquiring information about people's computers without their permission?

586657403[/snapback]

Yes, if you entered an incorrect CD key one time too much, they collected your mail address from the registry and such things. It was in Starcraft that time, and they had to remove it. I thought they had learned their lesson since then.

Edited by Jugalator

Exactly. Why would Blizzard want to collect millions of pieces of data, and then have to sift through them to find out your credit card number.

That's an insane amount of data.

It compares hash values with known hacks ... that's all. I don't know why everyone is freaked out about this. It's not as though they're going to find out your password for your MSN or Gmail account - or even your credit card number - but oh wait, they already have your credit card number. :p

Umm ... this was released in the 1.5 patch, it's NOT new to the 1.8 patch.

586657459[/snapback]

True. But this portion was updated... alot. To transfer everything forward to blizzard. Where in the EULA terms does it indicate them logging details of everything you are doing on your PC at any given time?

Yes, if you entered an incorrect CD key one time too much, they collected your mail address from the registry and such things. It was in Starcraft that time, and they had to remove it. I thought they had learned their lesson since then.

586657477[/snapback]

They didn't have it included in the EULA, thats why they stopped it. Now that its in the EULA, basically, if you don't like it, stop playing the game.

Why are people so parranoid about this? Do you all really think Blizzard wants your info, or is selling it to some third party spyware company? That would be like sitting on a rocket, point first and pushin the button, saying I hope this dosn't hurt! If your so concerned about this, contact Blizzard and ask them about it politely, I'm sure they are more than willing to discuss it with you all.

Starting a topic here that has the possiblility of causing panic in people and players of the game with out knowing the full facts, contacting the parties involved, and talking to Blizzard about the situcation is not very smart. Just my two cents on this, and I'm done. I'm off to play some more WoW.

I honestly don't understand why people have this near fanatical belief that Blizzard are the best games producers on the planet, World of Warcraft, or more accurately, Everquest Reskinned is "just another mmorpg" like all othe rmmorpgs, following in the wake of the massive success of the late Ultima Online and the rapidly dying Star Wars Galaxies.

586657484[/snapback]

Where did anyone mention in this thread the quality of the game or how good Blizzard is at making games? Nowhere. Stay on topic.

I honestly don't understand why people have this near fanatical belief that Blizzard are the best games producers on the planet, World of Warcraft, or more accurately, Everquest Reskinned is "just another mmorpg" like all othe rmmorpgs, following in the wake of the massive success of the late Ultima Online and the rapidly dying Star Wars Galaxies.

586657484[/snapback]

Blizzard is far from the best game producer. They are hated by a lot of people, and rightly so. But just because people all of a sudden say there is 'super dangerous omg spyware' in their program, doesn't make it true. Yes, there is an active agent that scans your open processes for known hacks. No, they will not steal your credit card number, passwords, social security number from you.

I honestly don't understand why people have this near fanatical belief that Blizzard are the best games producers on the planet, World of Warcraft, or more accurately, Everquest Reskinned is "just another mmorpg" like all othe rmmorpgs, following in the wake of the massive success of the late Ultima Online and the rapidly dying Star Wars Galaxies.

The bottom line is if enough people don't like it and don't play the game, they will change it. Until then, either accept it and play or don't. They made the game, they make the rules.

I watched the warden sniff down the email addresses of people I was communicating with on MSN, the URL of several websites that I had open at the time, and the names of all my running programs, including those that were minimized or in the toolbar. These strings can easily contain social security numbers or credit card numbers, for example, if I have Microsoft Excel or Quickbooks open w/ my personal finances at the time.

586657374[/snapback]

Yes, that's exactly what Blizzard is going for. They want all your credit card numbers (that they already have!!) and your social security numbers for nefarious purposes. Did they author fail to mention that this information isn't transmitted back to Blizzard unless you're doing something wrong anyways?

wow is gone from my pc

Wow, way to make a snap decision based on one article's opinion of this anti-cheating technique. If you're not cheating, who cares?

This is no worse than Punkbuster.

Actually, PB is worse as it can take screenshots and upload them to server admins.

that is what ounkbuster does, but it dosnt record anything

Yes, it does, otherwise how can you prove that you were wrongfully banned? And how do the PB guys know what to look for if it's never posted to any websites? They need logged information to be able to build up a database of stuff to block.

Basically, there's nothing wrong with this and this is nothing games like Battlefield or Counter-Strike already do. The author just appears to be stiring up FUD against WoW.

Once these strings are obtained, they are passed through a hashing function and compared against a list of 'banning hashes' - if you match something in their list, I suspect you will get banned.

Dosen't this mean that the information collected is not sent to Blizzard but hashed against a local database... therefore credit card numbers would not get sent to Blizz - and even if the hashes were sent to blizz they couldn't be read

This is a stupid argument IMO everyone is just looking for every program to have some kind of instance of what they call "SPYWARE" just so they can be the fist to post it, the way i see it if we had no hackers and/or cheaters we would not need stuff like that to begin with, but seing as how we do, and there is not exatly alot we can do about it, we have to, we know counter measures are like this, and i agree with them, i pay every month to play the game, and i dont want to put in my time in a game that allows for that kind of action to be taken, A. it help to keep basic hacking down, and B. shows me blizzard does not want their game to go to $h1t. as long as the program does not acculay take any personal info from my computer im fine with it.

Chill out, be Groovy,

--GotoLamia==

Blizzard has already stated many times that they are not collecting personal info nor handing it out to anyone.

586657421[/snapback]

Just because Blizzard states does mean its true, they've been in trouble before for such things. Unless someone is watching them to make sure they are complying with there statements how can we be sure its true.

what, you never heard of multitasking b4?

586658147[/snapback]

Yeah, I've heard of multitasking but I would think that playing a game would require your undivided attention not to mention running a lot faster without a bunch of background processes sucking up CPU and memory bandwidth.

@ aristotle-dude: WoW actually doesn't require much system resource. When I played the game at the beginning of this year (don't anymore because i found it boring as all hell), when I was on long flights between towns I would often open my web browser and do other things while I waited.

I find it really sad that blizzard can't determine a player is cheating or not without going out side their system and snooping. If a player is cheating then they shouldn't even have to look at the players computer, just if what is taking place on their server makes sense. But I don't claim to fully understand the complexities of massive multiplayer systems so I digress.

-shadrack

Now this is public information, all that a cheater has to do is forget about using strings to name window titles.

Leave the title blank and instead use a bitmap that can't be read (easily) by a bot that's scanning for window caption strings.

Let's see here.

VAC2, Punkbuster and now blizzard with this little nifty thing.

But wait we have more, starforce for an example (not quite right).

And the biggest snitch of them all... Microsoft Windows.

If you are so paranoid about your information don't use the Internet.

Exactly. Why would Blizzard want to collect millions of pieces of data, and then have to sift through them to find out your credit card number.

That's an insane amount of data.

It compares hash values with known hacks ... that's all. I don't know why everyone is freaked out about this. It's not as though they're going to find out your password for your MSN or Gmail account - or even your credit card number - but oh wait, they already have your credit card number. :p

586657483[/snapback]

Lexcyn wins the thread!!!

/they ALREADY HAVE your CC number *grin*

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you have a TV in your living room, chances are you can probably just use the Steam Link app and play your huge PC in big picture mode, effectively giving you the Steam Machine experience to see if you'd actually like it. The good news is the Steam Machine can have it's drives upgraded. It has a USB-C 10Gbs port as well, so the 512GB drive could be quickly moved to an external enclosure and repurposed.
    • This machine could very well be a second gaming PC for their living room as a console experience. So we would have to assume their main PC exists as well; With that said, I have 10gb home network with a 2.5gigabit internet connection here so we tend to have more than enough speed to download games. However, we can't make use of the 10gb LAN using Steam's built in transfer tool because it always compresses transfers and that slows the transfer down to well below a standard gigabit port speeds, sometimes as slow as 200-300Mb/s transfers. While that's probably still faster than most internet connections anyway, if they'd fix the LAN transfer issue it'd be upto x5 faster even on a gigabit LAN, than simply dropping a 2.5gbe port on there with hopes of a few people having fast internet connections. There are solutions, work arounds, like using LANCache if you run a NAS... or simply copying the files over manually using a network share.
    • Samsung announces ultra-fast UFS 5.0 storage to supercharge mobile AI by Paul Hill Local AI models tend to run a lot more slowly than cloud services like Claude and Gemini; however, Samsung has just announced that it has developed its UFS 5.0 solution, which increases data transfer to speeds of 10.8GB/s, enabling faster storage and processing in mobile memory that has the potential to provide more optimal local AI experiences. Commenting on this development, Jangseok Choi, head of Memory Product Planning at Samsung Electronics, said: If you’ve tried local AI, you’ll know it can be quite slow, especially if using the larger parameter models. By developing this new solution, Samsung says that storage is evolving from just storing data to a core piece of infrastructure that supports AI computation, too. The Korean company said that UFS 5.0 integrates the latest embedded memory interface standard from JEDEC and achieves up to 10.8 gigabytes per second (GB/s) transfer speeds. Regarding write speeds, Samsung UFS 5.0 can reach 9.5 GB/s. Both the read and write speeds are twice as fast as those of the previous UFS 4.1 standard. Aside from being ideal for local AI, Samsung’s UFS 5.0 is more power efficient by 40% compared to UFS 4.1. Samsung achieved this by implementing innovations such as clock gating and multi-voltage technologies. UFS 5.0 is also ultra-compact at just 7.5mm x 13mm x 0.9mm; that is 16.7% smaller than UFS 4.1. The company said it will be bringing it to multiple devices in the future, including mobile, wearable, and extended reality.
    • A bit like the steamdeck, this probably isn't for you.
    • Gamers Nexus already did their review, and building your own will be faster and cheaper, so not very convincing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      209
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      99
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      86
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!