Creative unveils Vision:M video iPod killer


Recommended Posts

Creative is about to launch its alternative to Apple's video-enabled fifth-generation iPod. Creative is expected to announce the player tomorrow, but the company's Japanese division appears to have jumped the gun and detailed the machine today.

Dubbed the Zen Vision:M, the skinny player combines music and video playback with photo viewing, all on its 2.5in, 262,144-colour, 320 x 240 LCD.

The unit measures 10.4 x 6.2 x 1.9cm into which Creative has squeezed a 30GB hard drive and a rechargeable battery capable of running for four hours in video-playback mode and 14 hours when pumping out music, Creative claimed.

Music formats supported include MP3, WMA with DRM and WAV. The Vision:M will play MPEG 1, 2 and 4, WMV 9, Motion JPEG, DivX 4 and 5, and XviD video files. Photos need to be JPEGs. The player has a recordable FM tuner on board, though this may not make it to all territories, we understand.

The unit weighs 166g, compared to the 30GB iPod's 136g. The two products are pretty much the same size face-on, but the iPod is about half as thick. That said, the Vision:M plays video for longer: four hours to the iPod's two.

Interestingly, Creative has equipped the Vision:M with a slim connector, no doubt in the hope of encouraging the formation of an ecosystem of compatible accessories of the kind that currently services iPod owners.

In Japan, at least, the Vision:M will retail for ?39,800 ($329/?190), and will be offered in iPod-style white and black, and also in green. It goes on sale there mid-December. ?

visionm_1.jpg

Source

Interesting, though I think it's quite a stretch to call it an "iPod killer." Let's see:

1) Same size screen as the iPod. It better be a darn good one, because the iPod's LCD is one of the absolute best out there as far as mobile devices go.

2) Double the video battery life. Very good, point to Creative.

3) Twice the thickness. Ouch. A large part of the iPod's appeal is it's small size. The thickness (or thinness) makes a big difference for many buyers, I can say that with certainty. Point to Apple.

4) Same capacity, but costs even more. Not so good.

5) Format compatibility. Here's where the Creative has a real chance to shine, but only if it can play a standard DiVX file from your desktop without having to resample it to 320x240. If you do, then there's no advantage over the video iPod here at all, because you'll still have to spend time converting your videos.

6) Looks. Personally, I think it's butt-ugly. Not a fan of the entire lower half being buttons (can't grab it anywhere around the bottom without pressing anything), and generally just so many lines across the thing.

7) Interface. Creative would have had to pull quite a feat to come up with an interface as simple and efficient as Apple's. Somehow, I doubt that happening because they've had years and they haven't got it right yet.

So, here's what I think, in summary: a real good competitor, on some points, and a good alterative for some people, perhaps. But far, far from an "iPod killer".

I am sorry, but that thing is just not THAT great, and creative just always seem to try to make an 'ipod killer'.

Dont get me wrong, I dont like Ipod, I own a creative muvo N200 right now. But the fact is the Ipod is definitely in for its looks, but that creative has more compatibility and WAYYYYYYYYYYYY Better sound (Which is exactly what I want) they get their looks right, I am sold for one.

iPod killer? More like iPod copy that will flop like all the Creative players that came before it.

I've always said that a true "iPod killer" will look nothing like an iPod. You have to innovate, not duplicate, if you want to make a dent in this market.

The whole color scheme of that interface is a direct copy of the iPod and the interface itself is probably much less intuitive based on Creative's history. And what is with those buttons? Other than the play/pause, many of those symbols are confusing and foreign to consumers.

The iPod is all about simplicity, ease of use, and an ecosystem of software and services (iTunes) to pull everything together. No one can match that combination at this point.

I would not call this an ipod killer....I mean it costs more, weighs more, looks worse and creative's software is not as good as Apple's IMO...... I have owned three mp3 players in the past 3 years and the iPod is still the best in terms of looks and performance I have owned......but you know people are going to buy this just because they have some weird hate for Apple and the iPod :p

Oh. I think the iPod (video) sucks too, because of its battery life and large size. My PDA is only slightly larger and has a 480x320 screen, plus a camera, wi-fi, etc etc.

Plays movies much better. And for more than two hours, too.

The main purpose of an iPod will always be music. At that, it crushes any PDA or device Creative has. Video functionality is just a plus and just for hardcore geeks at this point. To me, the important piece is that Apple made it braindead simple to get videos onto the iPod via the iTunes store.

The next iPod will be stellar when it comes to video.

Creative still doesn't get it. It isn't so much about features (although those are important), but the whole package. I can buy an iPod, bring it home, and within 5-10 minutes have iTunes up, ripping CD's, and buying songs on iTunes for 99 cents. No Creative or any other mp3 player comes close to that type of integration and simplicity.

I can give someone an iPod (and they never used one), say "Rotation your thumb on the wheel" and within seconds most people pick up how it works and within a minute they are navigating it like a pro.

In fact, my mom bought an iPod nano a month or two ago. I knew she was getting one, but I didn't have time to call to see how she liked it. I get a call later and my mom is chatting away with me. I ask if she got the iPod and she goes "Yeah, I already bought 20 songs and imported a few CD's...this is simple."

Creative might get it sometime, but they fall short again.

I would not call this an ipod killer....I mean it costs more, weighs more, looks worse and creative's software is not as good as Apple's IMO...... I have owned three mp3 players in the past 3 years and the iPod is still the best in terms of looks and performance I have owned......but you know people are going to buy this just because they have some weird hate for Apple and the iPod :p

Not really a weird hate for the iPod. I don't like how it doesn't have an fm radio, that I can't use wmp with it, that if I want to transfer some songs from my buddy's computer I have to go and install itunes or go back to my place and set it up as a hardrive. I don't like how it comes with cheap earphones and has worse sound overall. I don't like its limit on formats. I don't like its battery life or the fact that you can't easily replace the battery.

Don't get me wrong though. I'm just hard to satisfy. I love the huge screen, the clickwheel, the whole design, the size and the smoothness of the iPod. I love the black version of the iPod video, absolutely beautiful.

Edited by slimy

ew slimy do you like WMP :x I can't stand it.... always seems to take ages to open and start going for me but each to their own....you do know that you can use Winamp with the ipod?

It does everything I need, plays everything I need, organizes my music correctly, opens really fast and has great skins availabe :D

iPod killer? More like iPod copy that will flop like all the Creative players that came before it.

I've always said that a true "iPod killer" will look nothing like an iPod. You have to innovate, not duplicate, if you want to make a dent in this market.

The whole color scheme of that interface is a direct copy of the iPod and the interface itself is probably much less intuitive based on Creative's history. And what is with those buttons? Other than the play/pause, many of those symbols are confusing and foreign to consumers.

The iPod is all about simplicity, ease of use, and an ecosystem of software and services (iTunes) to pull everything together. No one can match that combination at this point.

Great post.

Any so called "iPod killer" has to be nothing like an iPod at all. Seriously.

iPod killer? More like iPod copy that will flop like all the Creative players that came before it.

I've always said that a true "iPod killer" will look nothing like an iPod. You have to innovate, not duplicate, if you want to make a dent in this market.

The whole color scheme of that interface is a direct copy of the iPod and the interface itself is probably much less intuitive based on Creative's history. And what is with those buttons? Other than the play/pause, many of those symbols are confusing and foreign to consumers.

The iPod is all about simplicity, ease of use, and an ecosystem of software and services (iTunes) to pull everything together. No one can match that combination at this point.

I think the following has the potential to be an ipod killer: http://www.iriveramerica.com/prod/ultra/u10/U10-1GB.aspx (just much bigger hd size)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google Chrome 149.0.7827.156 (offline installer) by Razvan Serea The web browser is arguably the most important piece of software on your computer. You spend much of your time online inside a browser: when you search, chat, email, shop, bank, read the news, and watch videos online, you often do all this using a browser. Google Chrome is a browser that combines a minimal design with sophisticated technology to make the web faster, safer, and easier. Use one box for everything--type in the address bar and get suggestions for both search and Web pages. Thumbnails of your top sites let you access your favorite pages instantly with lightning speed from any new tab. Desktop shortcuts allow you to launch your favorite Web apps straight from your desktop. Chrome has many useful features built in, including automatic full-page translation and access to thousands of apps, extensions, and themes from the Chrome Web Store. Google Chrome is one of the best solutions for Internet browsing giving you high level of security, speed and great features. This update includes 33 security fixes. [N/A][516496659] Critical CVE-2026-12437: Use after free in WebShare. Reported by Google on 2026-05-25 [N/A][516947912] Critical CVE-2026-12438: Inappropriate implementation in WebView. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][519728275] Critical CVE-2026-12439: Use after free in Digital Credentials. Reported by Google on 2026-06-03 [N/A][519731619] Critical CVE-2026-12440: Use after free in DigitalCredentials. Reported by Google on 2026-06-03 [N/A][520157118] Critical CVE-2026-12441: Use after free in File Input. Reported by Google on 2026-06-05 [N/A][521950423] Critical CVE-2026-12442: Use after free in Passwords. Reported by Google on 2026-06-09 [N/A][522566295] Critical CVE-2026-12443: Use after free in Web Authentication. Reported by Google on 2026-06-11 [N/A][513160088] High CVE-2026-12444: Out of bounds read in Chromoting. Reported by Google on 2026-05-14 [N/A][513199795] High CVE-2026-12445: Use after free in Extensions. Reported by Google on 2026-05-14 [N/A][513313107] High CVE-2026-12446: Insufficient data validation in Passwords. Reported by Google on 2026-05-14 [N/A][513405023] High CVE-2026-12447: Heap buffer overflow in WebRTC. Reported by Google on 2026-05-15 [N/A][513458233] High CVE-2026-12448: Inappropriate implementation in WebView. Reported by Google on 2026-05-15 [N/A][513480539] High CVE-2026-12449: Use after free in Chromoting. Reported by Google on 2026-05-15 [N/A][514531776] High CVE-2026-12450: Inappropriate implementation in Media. Reported by Zhixin Tu on 2026-05-19 [N/A][514741076] High CVE-2026-12451: Use after free in DigitalCredentials. Reported by Google on 2026-05-19 [N/A][515462244] High CVE-2026-12452: Use after free in Downloads. Reported by Google on 2026-05-21 [N/A][516448843] High CVE-2026-12453: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Input. Reported by Google on 2026-05-25 [N/A][516926968] High CVE-2026-12454: Race in Safe Browsing. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517069848] High CVE-2026-12455: Use after free in Tab Strip. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517124587] High CVE-2026-12456: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517153117] High CVE-2026-12457: Insufficient data validation in Extensions. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517258337] High CVE-2026-12458: Incorrect security UI in Passwords. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517406035] High CVE-2026-12459: Inappropriate implementation in Serial. Reported by Google on 2026-05-28 [N/A][517484284] High CVE-2026-12460: Insufficient policy enforcement in File System Access. Reported by Google on 2026-05-28 [N/A][517727318] High CVE-2026-12461: Out of bounds read in WebRTC. Reported by Google on 2026-05-29 [N/A][517916024] High CVE-2026-12462: Use after free in Media. Reported by Google on 2026-05-29 [N/A][518042749] High CVE-2026-12463: Inappropriate implementation in Views. Reported by Google on 2026-05-30 [N/A][519358344] High CVE-2026-12464: Use after free in Browser. Reported by Google on 2026-06-03 [N/A][520189702] High CVE-2026-12465: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Metrics. Reported by Google on 2026-06-05 [N/A][520199394] High CVE-2026-12466: Heap buffer overflow in WebRTC. Reported by Google on 2026-06-05 [N/A][520202726] High CVE-2026-12467: Use after free in Extensions. Reported by Google on 2026-06-05 [N/A][521485244] High CVE-2026-12468: Inappropriate implementation in Updater. Reported by Google on 2026-06-08 [N/A][521618871] High CVE-2026-12469: Uninitialized Use in GPU. Reported by Google on 2026-06-09 Important to know! The offline installer links do not include the automatic update feature. Download web installer: Google Chrome Web 32-bit | Google Chrome 64-bit | Freeware Download: Google Chrome Offline Installer 64-bit | Direct Link | 131.0 MB Download: Google Chrome Offline Installer 32-bit | Direct Link | 119.0 MB Download page: Google Chrome Portable Download: Chrome ARM64 | Direct Link View: Chrome Website | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • they couldnt do W11 LTSC so the support lasts longer....
    • The fact that the pref is not enabled by default tells you that what you see is what you get...for now. Hopefully the final version will have all the quirks ironed out.
    • It's enterprise, not consumer. And "...affected scenarios involve third-party software..." Would be good to know that in headline, not way down in the article. Instead, you lead with Windows update, which is not very helpful and misleading, IMHO. Just saying.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      85
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!