Creative unveils Vision:M video iPod killer


Recommended Posts

If it plays divx files regardless of size and stuff this is something for me!

I have so many divx files on my pc that this would be great to store it on, and use it for

on the go and catch up on my missed tv shows :)

I don't like the menu interface - it is too much like iPods. That being said, I have used my brother's creative zen player and IMHO it is a much better mp3 player then the iPod. I bought an Ipod to use while I excerise and i can't even jog with it (that causes the ipod to crash)... I can't sync files by browsing to the ipod and dropping mp3s on it (come on it's 2005 for christ sake!) w/o using Itunes (which is the s******t mp3 player for a computer around). This was my first Apple product purchase and it will definately be my last! Next time I will listen to that little voice in the back of my head telling me that Steve Jobs is taking me for a ride as I paid for it...

I can't sync files by browsing to the ipod and dropping mp3s on it (come on it's 2005 for christ sake!) w/o using Itunes (which is the s******t mp3 player for a computer around).

yes you can, i do it everyday using xplay 2. there is also anapod explorer, but this one is a bit harder to find if you know what i mean.

so weither you pay extra or not, but you can definately browse your ipod though the explorer.

As many people have already said, they COPIED the basic iPod UI which bugs me first... The navigation buttons are no where compared to the click wheel and its much thicker! Overall: (N)

You forget that Apple is getting sued from creative for copying their UI. Creative had a patent on it and the ipods still used it ;)

its an ipod killer just because of all the formats it works with no one in their right mind would use an ipod if your wanting compatability and ease of video playback. Your only excuse for the ipod is now the looks :p

DIVX here i come!!!!!111 :woot:

yes you can, i do it everyday using xplay 2. there is also anapod explorer, but this one is a bit harder to find if you know what i mean.

so weither you pay extra or not, but you can definately browse your ipod though the explorer.

Sure I can browse it - woohoo. But I shouldn't have to use Itunes to sync files on it so that they will be recognized by the ipod's software. I'm not going to "buy" extra software to do something that every other mp3 player out there does automatically... :crazy:

Your only excuse for the ipod is now the looks

1. Cost

2. AAC and ITunes Compatible

3. Brand Loyalty (owned others)

4. Better UI navigation

5. Ease of Use

//off the top of my head

PS. I owned 1st, 3rd, Mini and now Nano. Not a fan boy.. just loyal and prefer brainless use of the ipod.

1. Cost

2. AAC and ITunes Compatible

3. Brand Loyalty (owned others)

4. Better UI navigation

5. Ease of Use

//off the top of my head

PS. I owned 1st, 3rd, Mini and now Nano. Not a fan boy.. just loyal and prefer brainless use of the ipod.

No disrespect but I was following you until I read the "I owned 1st, 3rd, Mini and now Nano. Not a fan boy.. "... Sometimes you just need to take a good long look in the mirror and say "I am an apple fanboy, I am an apple fanboy"! :p

I find it very agrvating how people SWEAR that iPod had their UI before Creative did and that Creative is just a huge copy. You apple fanboys never stop amazing me. When confronted with nano's flaw (creative btw had that name first) they quickly came back with "BUY A FSCKING CASE." You shouldn't have to buy a case for a MP3 player, period. Then i laughed when the video came out and they threw in a cheapass case for it (i'm sure that planned...) Now when Creative releases a new player that has a color screen everyone (read apple fanboys) flips out and goes crazy about how Creative copied iPods UI. Well, they didn't.

http://www.betanews.com/article/Creative_T...tent/1125404963

Eat it.

I would love to see apple forced to change the UI on new iPod models over this. Then the apple fanboys would be pwnt :laugh:

yes that would be rolf (I own a zen micro) and they might have or at least a nice hefty settlement.

The fact is tough they have to take Apple's ideas into it otherwise who would by it?

Anyway Creative have had movie players out for ages I use to own a Portable Media Centre, in till it broke.

You're forgetting that most people just want to listen to music and the iPod gives them that in a stylish and very simplistic package. The 150 million accessories don't hurt it either.

That too... Also for all of you just hoping to **** of the apple fanboys, don't bother, the iPod isn't the only source of pride, lol. But joking aside, the difference is that the iPod is successful. It is successful because it struck a chord that turned on the masses. No other company has been able to do this yet.

ack ok then

I thought this media player was syncing within explorer by making a removeable disk like my old muvo do

I have having a software to sync too

I own an ipod mini but my wife uses it most of the time hehe

so she takes care of the sync.. ack!

Now when Creative releases a new player that has a color screen everyone (read apple fanboys) flips out and goes crazy about how Creative copied iPods UI. Well, they didn't.

http://www.betanews.com/article/Creative_T...tent/1125404963

Eat it.

Yeah, because no one had come up the idea of automatically filing tracks in a hierarchical order based on attributes of the tracks on a portable music player before. :whistle:

"According to one aspect of the present invention, a technique is provided for organizing tracks on a portable music player by automatically filing tracks in a hierarchical order based on attributes of the tracks," patent application 6,928,433 reads.

"According to another aspect of the invention, the hierarchy is derived by using metadata associated with the audio content that was obtained through any source of metadata (e.g. CDDB metadata, id3v2 metadata, other obtainable metadata) and subsequently stored with or alongside the file that stores the track."

Use some common sense. There is no way the Creative patent is valid. I can remember several MP3 players I purchased before 2001 that did this.

Um.. they used their UI in 2000. Read the source closer.

"The patent was used in Creative's NOMAD Jukebox, which debuted in September 2000. Creative points out that the iPod did not ship for another 13 months."

Edited by Fit4130Rider
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Can you read? I've said I'm willing to pay more for a notchless (no notch) 3:2 screen.
    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • make your own notch - it's not that hard
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • OK, now ask yourself how are they going to enforce that law? By requiring every single adult to prove their age and provide their legal identity documents to an UNREGULATED 3rd party company that already has a long track record of multiple data breaches. Not to mention, parliament have voted AGAINST this ban, twice, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. So, where's the democracy here, because that looks like dictatorship to me. The solution here is parental responsibility, not government control. Run some public service announcements on TV and UK social media teaching parents how to setup parental controls. That's already been proven to actually work. But the, this is not and has NEVER been about keeping kids safe. It's about control and monitoring. Watching what you're doing online and controlling what you can see and what you can say.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      102
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!