Recommended Posts

Wow and no mention of extensions, the single sole reason why 90% of people choose firefox over anything else... Also the fact that even with the bugs of IE millions of people still used it regardless, a single page showing FF myths will not change users from using FF now. Although it is a interesting read it's nothing that hasn't been known for a while. It's nothing major too if the avergae user has common sense.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/413002-firefox-myths/#findComment-586976177
Share on other sites

wow good read, cant wait for the FF followers to come here and complain

although that site looks like an opera add :wacko:

I agree on the Opera add part.. kind of what I felt.. Being a Firefox users I can agree with the facts but it won't make me change. I just like Firefox as an over all browser and unless it starts sucking viruses and spyware onto my system I am not going to change..

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/413002-firefox-myths/#findComment-586976181
Share on other sites

Myth - "Firefox is a Solution to Spyware"

Who thinks that? It isn't trying to compete against AdAware or Spybot!

Myth - "Firefox is the Fastest Web Browser"

Read his source!

Firefox is not faster than Internet Explorer, except for scripting, but for standards support, security and features, it is a better choice

The article also says IE is twice as slow when rendering scripts.

Seems like an article to sell Opera.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/413002-firefox-myths/#findComment-586976252
Share on other sites

Most of the points are pretty moot IMO.

I honestly don't care if firefox loads pages 1.30298341872304 ms slower than opera; the interface is like 10x friendlier (I mean, have you ever tried configuring the browsing buttons/tabs/address bar in opera? ..in firefox you can just drag and drop them and have them perfectly arranged in a matter of seconds, while I just could not figure out how to get the address bar above the tabs and whatnot).

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/413002-firefox-myths/#findComment-586976271
Share on other sites

I must say that whoever created this has to be an Opera fanboy.

Everyone 'nerd' should know that there is no perfect software and anyone who thinks that Firefox is bug free is just stupid, sorry, but it is the truth.

As technology and code evolve, things such as popups will happen, but that's why Mozilla updates Firefox every-so-often.

Who said Firefox used tabs first? I don't remember ever hearing or seeing this :unsure: I've always known that Netscape, a Gecko-based browser, used tabs first. Wait you're telling me that Opera developed tabbed browsing in '95 and forgot to put them in until 2000-- sounds fishy to me.

I've never heard anyone say that Firefox was completely standard compliant, and that it worked with every website/page out there. It isn't only up to the browser developer, but also up to the site developer to make sure that the site/page works with every browser.

Firefox is secure. My company switched a few months ago from IE to FF and we haven't had a single case of 'spyware' or 'adware' due to ActiveX Controllers. Now don't get me wrong, people have still gone and downloaded 'crap,' but it hasn't been because the browser was stupid (IE), but more because the user didn't really know what s/he was downloading. Firefox has cut down though on the amount of spyware/adware cases we've seen though.

This might have been more believeable if Opera wasn't mentioned so much. The article should've been written so that Firefox was blasted and at the very end you give an alternative, such as Opera... but since it is obvious that an Opera fanboy wrote it, I conclude that most of this is just plain BS (N)

Edited by Hurmoth
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/413002-firefox-myths/#findComment-586976290
Share on other sites

Most of that seems like crap.

In a recent study by a UK based web testing firm SciVisum, 1 in 10 UK web sites failed to work properly with Firefox. - Source

Notes - Opera has the same problems as Firefox in regard to web page compatibility.

This because web designers have to spend their time making sure that it works with IE because IE doesn't work to standards. You have to use hacks to get stuff to work in IE that works in every other browser.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/413002-firefox-myths/#findComment-586976314
Share on other sites

Wow what total BS.

No one has ever claimed half of those things for Firefox. Especially the parts about being most secure or whatever. Firefox is more secure the IE, but that has never meant it was 100% secure.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/413002-firefox-myths/#findComment-586976327
Share on other sites

Funny article. I developed an Xhtml web page and for kicks had it side by side with one from w3schools. IE and Firefox both rendered them correctly. Opera didn't even know what do do with them. It was that test right there that prompted me to switch from Opera to Firefox. Links to IE have been completly removed and opera doesn't even exist on my computer now.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/413002-firefox-myths/#findComment-586976349
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
    • OpenAI is making Codex more useful in Chrome and the cloud by Pradeep Viswanathan OpenAI's Codex now has more than 5 million users, up nearly 4x from earlier this year. To further accelerate Codex's growth among developers, OpenAI today announced that it has agreed to acquire Ona, a company that builds secure cloud execution and orchestration technology for developers. Ona will enable developers to run Codex with persistent and controlled cloud infrastructure for long-running agentic workflows. Right now, most Codex execution happens locally on developers' laptops and PCs, and the agents work continuously for hours. Through Ona, OpenAI aims to make Codex agents keep working for days without being tied to a user’s local machine or an active session. This will be an important capability for enterprises that want to deploy AI agents in production while maintaining control over infrastructure, data, security boundaries, credential scope, logging, and review workflows. Like any acquisition, the deal is still subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals. Until the deal closes, OpenAI and Ona will continue to operate as separate companies. After closing, Ona’s team will join the Codex team to improve developer workflows. Alongside the Ona acquisition announcement, OpenAI today introduced a few Codex updates. Developers can now save Codex rate limit resets and use them later instead of losing them when they are not needed immediately. OpenAI is also adding a referral option where users can invite a friend to Codex and get a saved rate limit reset. OpenAI today also announced a developer mode for browser use in Chrome and the Codex in-app browser. With this mode, Codex can use the Chrome DevTools Protocol to debug web apps, inspect pages, and work more directly with browser-based development workflows. Developers can use this when they want Codex to profile JavaScript, inspect console output and network traffic, examine web page states including the DOM and applied styles, and more.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      186
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!