Recommended Posts

Most of that seems like crap.

This because web designers have to spend their time making sure that it works with IE because IE doesn't work to standards. You have to use hacks to get stuff to work in IE that works in every other browser.

Yep as a web designer I code for Firefox and hack for IE.

One problem with this article is too many of the points are vague. The points only expose the negative side of Firefox, and only uncovers the postitive side of Opera, without noting its flaws whatsoever. For instance: "Firefox works with every page" - as an Opera user, I can strongly attest there are more broken pages that show up in Opera versus Firefox. Does this mean Opera sucks? Definitely not. I can always view that page in Firefox and IE. Opera is my preferred (note: preferred, not ONLY) browser because of its built in features and speed, and because I already have the browser customized to my needs.

Knowing that, I can see how you're trying to silence some rampant FF fanboys who think their browser is the alpha and the omega of the web. Like some people here who instantly dismiss the entire article as trash. :rolleyes: It's best you refrain from continuing such articles like this, else you're lowering yourself to the same level as these fanboys.

Most of the points are pretty moot IMO.

I honestly don't care if firefox loads pages 1.30298341872304 ms slower than opera; the interface is like 10x friendlier (I mean, have you ever tried configuring the browsing buttons/tabs/address bar in opera? ..in firefox you can just drag and drop them and have them perfectly arranged in a matter of seconds, while I just could not figure out how to get the address bar above the tabs and whatnot).

Ironically you use the exact same method as you would use with Firefox. Drag and drop. :rolleyes:

I could care less if it's an Opera ad (No, not "add"), as long as the information is true.

Firefox is secure. My company switched a few months ago from IE to FF and we haven't had a single case of 'spyware' or 'adware' due to ActiveX Controllers. Now don't get me wrong, people have still gone and downloaded 'crap,' but it hasn't been because the browser was stupid (IE), but more because the user didn't really know what s/he was downloading. Firefox has cut down though on the amount of spyware/adware cases we've seen though.

While you're other points were somewhat valid, that is just completely flawed.

You can't blame 'crap' being downloaded in firefox on the stupidity of the user and then 'crap' being downloaded in IE on the stupidity of the browser.

A computer is only as smart as the person using it.

I use Maxthon (uses IE engine) every day, and the other day I downloaded SpyBot and scanned my pc for the first time since I installed windows (2 months ago). It came out absolutely clean.

And also, I don't see why employees at your company would be going on websites that deliver spyware. Maybe thats something you should look into.

Myth - "Firefox is Bug Free"

Myth - "Firefox Blocks all Popups"

Myth - "Firefox was the first Web Browser to offer Tabbed Browsing"

Myth - "Firefox works with every Web Page"

I've never heard these myth anywhere, Neowin or elsewhere. Is he inventing myths to debunk?

2 words: straw man

@all the people who said it's an Opera ad:

Did you read (or at least scroll) all the way to the bottom?

It's an Avant Browser ad! :laugh:

(or did he edit it again?)

Right... When people say secure they really mean the browser has had 26 vulnerabilities, 6 of which were highly rated and still has 3 unpatched? Sure they do. :rolleyes:

Erm... I thought that Mozilla fixed most of those in FF 1.0.6 (I remeber that it only took a day or so from the exploits being anounced to Mozilla fixing the exploits)

This Mastertech guy posts this same thread on almost every tech forum I've seen - he's a pure and bred troll.

On R3D it was quickly locked - cross posting on every forum is nothing short of spam, especially when his own purpose is to promote his own site (possibly for ad-revenue) or trying to incite flames.

LOL - looks like spam, reads like spam --- is spam :) --- at least imho !!

I wonder why you need to be a fan of any particular browser anyhow -- use what you like ... that way you can only be angry with yourself if anything goes wrong or you can be happy and please with your decision if all goes well !!

Oh, and wonder whether anyone noticed the multiple references to Opera as the better browser --- free advertising --- ??! (Just being obnoxious here :))

But he recommends avant browser at the end.

I recommend and use Avant Browser, the best of all worlds.

AvantBrowser Avant Browser - Download - Home Page

A custom Internet Explorer based browser that utilizes the Internet Explorer Engine for 99.99% web page compatibility and features all the new features of Firefox and Opera. It has a Built-in Pop-up Blocker, Flash Animation Filter, Tabbed Browsing, Built-in Search Engine, Built-in RSS/ATOM Reader, Safe Recovery Feature, User Friendly Interface and Full 100% IE Compatibility.

Oh, and wonder whether anyone noticed the multiple references to Opera as the better browser --- free advertising --- ??! (Just being obnoxious here

oh sherlock, you are sooo smart...

have you read this actualy? last sentence of his art is: 'i use and recommend avant browser..' it doesnt sound as an opera advert. and problem with so many opera links is.. that well.. opera is better than most ff users think [as they never went past 'i dont like it, because it is not ff' phase] and some of these links are just true. maybe all, maybe only some. i dont know. but i wont trash it all, because 'im a ff user, and i know better'

I prefer FF, but I like Opera's speed, but I miss the extensions I have for FF after I use Opera, plus, Opera doesn't work for crap on some secure sites. If I have to use IE, I use Maxthon instead. FF and Opera are both memory hogs, it's not hard for either browser to hit over 100 MB.

If FF could get tnear to the same rendering speed as Opera, it would be close to perfect.

Wow and no mention of extensions, the single sole reason why 90% of people choose firefox over anything else... Also the fact that even with the bugs of IE millions of people still used it regardless, a single page showing FF myths will not change users from using FF now. Although it is a interesting read it's nothing that hasn't been known for a while. It's nothing major too if the avergae user has common sense.

Yep i use firefox for the extensions, cant live without them, IE will never have the kind of extensions firefox has and ive heard from real developers that FF extensions are easier to make than ANY add on for internet explorer. dont expect these factors to change. which is why i wont go back to ie (except for windows update.)

Erm... I thought that Mozilla fixed most of those in FF 1.0.6 (I remeber that it only took a day or so from the exploits being anounced to Mozilla fixing the exploits)

In Firefox v1.5 - 3 vulnerbilities are still unpatched and one is only partially patched.

Most of the points are pretty moot IMO.

I honestly don't care if firefox loads pages 1.30298341872304 ms slower than opera; the interface is like 10x friendlier (I mean, have you ever tried configuring the browsing buttons/tabs/address bar in opera? ..in firefox you can just drag and drop them and have them perfectly arranged in a matter of seconds, while I just could not figure out how to get the address bar above the tabs and whatnot).

Can I put the tabs on the bottom of the screen?

Definitely an Opera++ site. (Now 100% free!)

I thought so too - but then he advocates using Advant Browser????

Anyone with any tech savvy will know all of those facts already. Not that this will ever silence the firefox fanboys out there. Maybe he is a troll, and he may not back his facts up, but what he says is actually true, and anyone but a Firefox fanboy will admit so, and i personally think he leaned more on the side of IE than Opera anyway

Lol, a good read and a good laugh. I love how non specific all of the Myths, and the answers to them were. The funny thing is, if he actually wanted to silence FF fanboys (i use opera and FF and IE) he would have included actual facts. I think he pulled most of this stuff out of his ass, then found the first website that would back up his vague and non-descriptive claims.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why? Does anybody actually want this? The constant need to close all browser sessions and wait for a new version to install, just so that there’s a integrated coupon manager feels like a waste of everyone’s time
    • I remember when Louis used to just do interesting Mac/iPhone repairs, now he's boring and just launches "crusades" every week
    • A shame it don't allow people to bypass the MS account, I will stick to using Rufus.
    • Microsoft about to radically change how often your Edge browser updates by Paul Hill Microsoft has just announced that starting with Edge 152, it will be moving to a two-week release cycle for faster, smaller updates. This faster release cadence will begin on August 27. This change comes just several months after Microsoft switched Visual Studio Code to weekly updates. The company said that the Extended Stable releases will remain on an eight-week cycle and that no admin changes are needed to experience the faster release cycle on the Stable channel. The new two-week release cycle will enable the faster delivery of security updates and platform improvements, all while reducing the size and complexity of individual updates. Microsoft claims that organizations will benefit from this change as it offers predictable validation cycles. For organizations that prefer a “more deliberate pace”, the Extended Stable channel remains an option. This change will affect Edge Stable releases on Windows, macOS, Linux, and mobile. The Extended Stable channel will continue to be updated every eight weeks, or every fourth Stable release, for example: versions 152, 156, 160, and 164. The Extended Stable could be a good option for organizations that don’t want the latest updates twice a month and don’t want as much hassle constantly updating browsers. In the case of Visual Studio Code, many of the updates being pushed by Microsoft are AI-related. As we all know, Microsoft Edge has a lot of AI features, so we could see Microsoft pushing more AI, thanks to the faster cycles. On the flip side, quicker releases could mean faster security updates, which is beneficial in a world where AI systems are hunting for software exploits. What do you think? Let us know in the comments. For more updates on Edge, be sure to follow Neowin's coverage. In May alone, we reported on Edge offering in-browser pop-ups to assist users with website compatibility issues, that Edge was losing Copilot Mode, and that Microsoft had fixed a plain-text password bug in Edge. Source: Microsoft 365 Admin Center
    • not yet, because at the moment it is not a threat to MS, if and I mean if it did become a threat to MS Office, then it may be a different thing. MS don't like competition
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      159
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!