AutoPatcher XP January 2006


Recommended Posts

I applyed it on a computer? :shocked:

so what now...

dont worry about it, just remove it and replace with dec05 + jan06 update.

note with the new one, it might be worth reinstalling all updates that are detected as installed, because sometimes newer copies of an update become available and you want to be absolutely 100% sure youve got all the latest copies of files.

Damn I overreacted :blush: , but just couldn't figure out what kind of sick jock was to put january 2005 full and let people download it :huh:

Even my friend was shocked

duhovi26uw6hq.th.jpg

Ha ha, :D

But now seriously : if I extract patches and put the in folder of december full, will they be loaded and applyed as well? along with patches from dec?

Edited by TheBlazingAngel
if I extract patches and put the in folder of december full, will they be loaded and applyed as well? along with patches from dec?

just delete the autopatcher folder, download and install dec05 full or lite, download and install jan06 update, run autopatcher, and install everything, even those detected as installed (blue), then youll be fine.

Hi folks!

I'm trying to download December 2005 Full for Brazilian Portuguese. I'm unable to use eMule or other P2P software. A member has post a file into Filefront server but this download always reset.

I wanna know if there is a SITE that I can download the file using, if possible, a download manager, because is to hard to download this file. In my job with have a 1 MEGA link for download and we still has not made this download.

Thanks!

Willian Lopes

(Sorry my poor english! :( )

Torrents may not be of much use for such a small file, however ED2k and Gnutella links might:

Gnutella:

magnet:?xt=urn:bitprint:HJAOA7SQWUHR3BRPJPPF3JT4GQUC7YPF.MPH53GDR6XISXQBJYYUR5EXPJKHGBI2VLP74JAA&dn=AutoPatcher_XP_Jan06_ENU_Update.exe

ED2k:

ed2k://|file|AutoPatcher_XP_Jan06_ENU_Update.exe|6150882|f76fddef72c8466122805578dac8e1de|/

Just FYI - I usually keep a few versions past hosted via these two all the time... in addition to ancient versions like the pre-SP1s... My December ed2k/gnutella links are in the December thread too.

Hello, where can I find the patch related to the KB896984 issue ?

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/896984/en-us

I didn't find it into AutoPatcher XP.

Thanks for your help

896984 appears to be a hotfix. For this reason, I don't think you will see it in windows update, and therefore you won't see it in Autopatcher...

Hi.

Are you really not going to release a full version neither in jan06, neither in feb06 ?

Oh no !...

I would like so much a next full version ! When ?

And it seems you didnt included the december 2005 edition of DirectX 9.0c ?

Could you correct that ?

And another member mentionned a newer release of MSN 7.5 ?

Could you correct that ?

And you include both .NET 1.1, and .NET 2.0 ?

What for ? .NET 2.0 is the latest one, so it is enough, no ? Remove .NET 1.1...

But, anyway, it seems that some upadates and powertoys and tools and softs require .NET 1.1, and even if .NET 2.0 is installed, they dont recognize it, and they refuse to install ! How strange ! Could someone explain me that ? And how to make these softs get installed even without .NET 1.1 (because .NET 2.0 is already installed !) ?

You include both MSN Messenger + Windows Messenger : what for ? It is confusing, no ? The latest and best one is MSN, not Windows, so why dont you remove Windows one ?

Thanks.

Frederic Laroche.

PS : When a release in French Localized Version ? Could I do it myself ? What kind of skills it requires, and how long to do the translation, and also, where from to exchange the English Updates, with localized French Updates (is it possible ?) ?

Hi.

I desperatly await for an autopatcher-like full version for Windows 98 SE only !...

Would it be possible ?

Or I dream too much ???

Where to find such a cool thing ?

Because :

Windows 98 SE is still supported by Microsoft, and Windows Update still works for it !

But, only until June 2006 !!!

So, could you imagine, that from June 2006, there will be no more other updates for 98SE, than only from an autopatcher full edition ?

That's why I would highly suggest a release of such an autopatcher for Win98SE, from June 2006, because it will be the last ressource to keep this OS up to date, even after any re-install, after Microsoft stops updating it !

So, what do you think ?

Is it possible ?

I am free and ready to talk with you about to build such a tool you and me together, and we have time : it will be launched only after the limit date of June 2006.

Give me your feedback, please !

Frederic Laroche.

What I don't understand is - if the latest FULL (this month DECEMBER + JANUARY UPDATE) is all it takes to get up-to-date, how come the FULL files don't grow bigger and bigger? Shouldn't the size be ~ OCT + NOV + DEC or something like that?

The 'full' release does grow bigger every month - but there is no 'full' version this month. The full versions don't need to be installed ontop of a previous release, in fact they SHOULDN'T.

Hi.

Are you really not going to release a full version neither in jan06

no
neither in feb06 ?

That's up to the team to decide, we;ll see how many updates there are next month to see if it warrants a new 'full' release.

I would like so much a next full version ! When ?

Maybe next month, if there are enough updates to warrant it.

And it seems you didnt included the december 2005 edition of DirectX 9.0c ?

Could you correct that ?

Such things aren't included in 'lite' or 'update' releases, only in 'full'; wait for the next 'full' package or create your own module for it :)

And another member mentionned a newer release of MSN 7.5 ?

Could you correct that ?

same as above

And you include both .NET 1.1, and .NET 2.0 ?

What for ? .NET 2.0 is the latest one, so it is enough, no ? Remove .NET 1.1...

But, anyway, it seems that some upadates and powertoys and tools and softs require .NET 1.1, and even if .NET 2.0 is installed, they dont recognize it, and they refuse to install ! How strange ! Could someone explain me that ? And how to make these softs get installed even without .NET 1.1 (because .NET 2.0 is already installed !) ?

the .NET framework versions 1.1 and 2.0 are separate programs

You include both MSN Messenger + Windows Messenger : what for ? It is confusing, no ? The latest and best one is MSN, not Windows, so why dont you remove Windows one ?

Same reason as the .NET framework :)

PS : When a release in French Localized Version ? Could I do it myself ? What kind of skills it requires, and how long to do the translation, and also, where from to exchange the English Updates, with localized French Updates (is it possible ?) ?

please see this thread

Hi.

I desperatly await for an autopatcher-like full version for Windows 98 SE only !...

Would it be possible ?

Or I dream too much ???

Where to find such a cool thing ?

Because :

Windows 98 SE is still supported by Microsoft, and Windows Update still works for it !

But, only until June 2006 !!!

So, could you imagine, that from June 2006, there will be no more other updates for 98SE, than only from an autopatcher full edition ?

That's why I would highly suggest a release of such an autopatcher for Win98SE, from June 2006, because it will be the last ressource to keep this OS up to date, even after any re-install, after Microsoft stops updating it !

So, what do you think ?

Is it possible ?

I am free and ready to talk with you about to build such a tool you and me together, and we have time : it will be launched only after the limit date of June 2006.

Give me your feedback, please !

Frederic Laroche.

I'm afraid this has been suggested before, but cannot be done due to technical reasons beyon our control. One of which being the fact that a reboot is required after every update is applied.

QUOTE :

the .NET framework versions 1.1 and 2.0 are separate programs

Do you mean .NET 2.0 is not backward compatible with .NET 1.1 ?

2.0 does not include 1.1 ?

So, we should install both on our systems ?

Even in 98 or 2000 or XP ?

There is something I dont get it...

QUOTE :

AUTOPATCHER FOR WIN98SE :

I'm afraid this has been suggested before, but cannot be done due to technical reasons beyon our control. One of which being the fact that a reboot is required after every update is applied.

Look at Windows Update : first it downloads all updates in a temp folder named "WU", and then it installs automatically everything with only 1 reboot ! And then the "WU" folder is emptied !

How can they do such a thing with 98SE : only 1 reboot ?

Couldnt we do the same ?

Otherwise we could build a script that decompress all the updates in a TEMP folder + 1 script that will lauches all the updates in the right order, and by forcing windows to reboot after each update, and then by putting a shortcut in the startup folder, at each reboot windows will continue the script, and the script will keep a track on a temp log file about what update has been installed and what is next to install. After finishing, the script delete the shortcut from the startup, and delete the TEMP folder, and delete itself.

So, then, what do think about that ?

I can tell you that I have already done such a script a few years ago for WinNT, to automatically patch it and setup many tools, from a cd, and my cd was doing everything : deleting the partitions, rebuilding the partitions, formating them, installing the OS (without SP4), and then with a .REG included in my msbatch.inf, I was automatically updating to SP4, from my cd, and before installing the OS, I was checking the NIC PCI CODE under DOS, and I was copying in the WINNT_004 TEMP Install folder the correct folder with the correct driver for the correct NIC that was there, and then just before launching the setup, I was merging the correct text lines to my msbatch.inf, so that the setup automatically installs the correct NIC driver, and also with an IP address, and after installation was finished, I was putting a shortcut to a script stored in my CD in the startup, and all the Updates + Tools + Settings Process was launched automatically, including managing many reboots, after having set an automatic logon of "administrator", and even accessing a network server, for copying some files customized for every single pc, to install automatically a special certificate in IE, in a Java page that was really difficult to be scripted (but I found a way, yeah !) !!!

So, you see, maybe we could work about how to make such a Process to auto-update Win98SE, you and me ?

What do you think ?

Thanks.

Frederic Laroche.

QUOTE :

the .NET framework versions 1.1 and 2.0 are separate programs

Do you mean .NET 2.0 is not backward compatible with .NET 1.1 ?

2.0 does not include 1.1 ?

So, we should install both on our systems ?

Yes.

AUTOPATCHER FOR WIN98SE :

I'm afraid this has been suggested before, but cannot be done due to technical reasons beyon our control. One of which being the fact that a reboot is required after every update is applied.

Look at Windows Update : first it downloads all updates in a temp folder named "WU", and then it installs automatically everything with only 1 reboot ! And then the "WU" folder is emptied !

How can they do such a thing with 98SE : only 1 reboot ?

Couldnt we do the same ?

Otherwise we could build a script that decompress all the updates in a TEMP folder + 1 script that will lauches all the updates in the right order, and by forcing windows to reboot after each update, and then by putting a shortcut in the startup folder, at each reboot windows will continue the script, and the script will keep a track on a temp log file about what update has been installed and what is next to install. After finishing, the script delete the shortcut from the startup, and delete the TEMP folder, and delete itself.

So, then, what do think about that ?

I can tell you that I have already done such a script a few years ago for WinNT, to automatically patch it and setup many tools, from a cd, and my cd was doing everything : deleting the partitions, rebuilding the partitions, formating them, installing the OS (without SP4), and then with a .REG included in my msbatch.inf, I was automatically updating to SP4, from my cd, and before installing the OS, I was checking the NIC PCI CODE under DOS, and I was copying in the WINNT_004 TEMP Install folder the correct folder with the correct driver for the correct NIC that was there, and then just before launching the setup, I was merging the correct text lines to my msbatch.inf, so that the setup automatically installs the correct NIC driver, and also with an IP address, and after installation was finished, I was putting a shortcut to a script stored in my CD in the startup, and all the Updates + Tools + Settings Process was launched automatically, including managing many reboots, after having set an automatic logon of "administrator", and even accessing a network server, for copying some files customized for every single pc, to install automatically a special certificate in IE, in a Java page that was really difficult to be scripted (but I found a way, yeah !) !!!

So, you see, maybe we could work about how to make such a Process to auto-update Win98SE, you and me ?

What do you think ?

Thanks.

Frederic Laroche.

hmm, well I'm not 100% sure on why it doesn't work, all I know is that it doesn't. Search this forum and you'll probably find more info.

The 'full' release does grow bigger every month - but there is no 'full' version this month. The full versions don't need to be installed ontop of a previous release, in fact they SHOULDN'T.

Thanx for the answer :)

And I'll use updates from now on unless it's on a fresh installation of Windows - sounds like that's best ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      480
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      67
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      56
    5. 5
      monterxz
      55
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!