[Shell Patcher] Tango Icons for Windows


Recommended Posts

Yeah, to reiterate myself, Tango on Vista is 100% possible. Just it will require a full re-code of STTP. All new DLLs, icon locations in the DLL (shell32,10 in XP is different that shell32,10 in Vista), all new size + format bitmaps, completely new icons (256x256 needed now), new programs (WMP, Wordpad, hell even MSPAINT), and for one of the biggest reasons : NEW WFP FORMAT!

wfpdisable.exe from @stake does *not* work with Vista.

Other than that, it will be just a walk in the park :)

I'll try and put together a proof of concept. vertigosity, can I use your batch-script architecture for a Vista POC?

I'll make it only patch like 5 icons. But if one icon can be patched, then all icons can be patched (in time)

[edit] Just had a quick look through the DLLs on my Vista drive, and I can open up imageres.dll (consider it the Vista shell32.dll) and explorer.exe just fine. I even ripped out an icon from explorer.exe (I've been looking for the icon forever, a 256x256 created WLM icon!)

WFP is Windows File Protection. It's the thing that pops up and says "Unrecognized system files are...." and so on.
And then recopies them from the original source. Don't forget about that :p

Knock yourself out with the batch scripts.

Edit: I'm probably going to be retiring my current install in a day or two, and it's become a bit of a tradition for me to break out the latest Vista build I have (RC2, ATM) and play with it until I get tired of feeling like a geriatric retard with 2003-era hardware (well, I do have 2003-era hardware) and go back to XP. So I might try to poke around to see if I can figure out how/where WFP works myself, if only for trivia. I'd bet that'll be the same, but I KNOW resources got updated between RC2 and RTM. And RTM will exist for me only in 15-day blocks, really.

Edited by vertigosity

Unless you can reproduce it, so you can tell me which file was reloaded on the first boot after installation, it's not anything I can even look into. Maybe some component wanted to reinstall itself, and the reloader was just doing its job?Not from me!

I tried two times in VMware, I got this error every time.

After the first boot I see the Tango icons, but it claims one file still has to be replaced and a reboot is required.

If there is any way to see which file is being replaced after the reboot, I can report it back to you?

The musikcube tango icons on the site seemed extremely blurry to me, so I stole the tango Icons from the latest musikcube SVN (which includes tango icons) and they look a lot sharper, Icons for everything sans the buttons on the bottom left but those look fine anyway.

Icons from SVN

Current tango skin

Ok, so with the inclusion of the industrial set in the patcher, I just had to create a Total Commander icon theme to go with it :)

3y33aci.png

EDIT: I also packaged a sharper version of the regular Tango Total Commander theme, as the ones currently available are quite blurry. Let me know if anyone wants it, and I'll zip it and post it here.

industrial.zip

Edited by Dirhael

Ok, so with the inclusion of the industrial set in the patcher, I just had to create a Total Commander icon theme to go with it :)

3y33aci.png

EDIT: I also packaged a sharper version of the regular Tango Total Commander theme, as the ones currently available are quite blurry. Let me know if anyone wants it, and I'll zip it and post it here.

Awesome. Now do you see Gnome2 theme to work on in your future too? :D

Awesome. Now do you see Gnome2 theme to work on in your future too? :D

Sure, why not. It's not like it's that much work really :)

Here's the Gnome Total Commander icon theme:

2w1zh9l.png

gnome.zip

Does anyone know how to remove the drive meter posted earlier in the thread?
Yeah, delete the key at
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\DriveIcons\<drive letter>\DefaultIcon

for each drive that it needs to be removed from.

tangobugpv4.th.jpg

-Has this bug in the Gnome version benn fixed?

-There is also a bug in the screensaver selection if "no screensaver" is chosen. The blue placeholder doesn't fit in the screen.

But other than that I love this patcher. It's just perfect.

Thanks for all the updates vertigosity.

tangobugpv4.th.jpg

-Has this bug in the Gnome version benn fixed?

-There is also a bug in the screensaver selection if "no screensaver" is chosen. The blue placeholder doesn't fit in the screen.

But other than that I love this patcher. It's just perfect.

Thanks for all the updates vertigosity.

yep still has it just installed it today

untitledho8.th.jpg

I'm sorry dude, but that simply doesn't make any sense to me :D

Here's my reasoning:

Trusted sites bypass all of IE's security restrictions because IE gives them the go-ahead>> green icon "go"

Restricted sites are locked down>> red icon "stop"

Just think about it for a minute.

Anyway, it's no reason for me to get rid of the Tango Patcher, because I :wub: it

Eh, I'm thinking of it from the point of view of "how secure is the situation you're in right now?" - having a site marked as "trusted" is dangerous from a security standpoint, as it can pretty much do whatever it wants, whereas if it's marked as "restricted," the browser isn't going to just let the site damage the system - it's a more secure state. Otherwise, I need to change the Security Center notification icon telling the user that the firewall is down to a the green security-ok icon, because all remote computers have all been given the green light to connect to any local network service. I know, the way I've got it set doesn't jive with the way MS did it in IE4, but it makes more sense to me, and it's consistent with the way they're doing things now.

Now, onto the pink monitor in the Desktop tab of Display Properties when using Git2:

I finally got around to fixing it. The Magic Pink color just needed to be set to actual Magic Pink.

To apply it, put the attached file in %UserProfile%\Desktop\override\res_tweaked\themeui.dll before running the installer set to Git2.

Edited by vertigosity
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!