Man Sues Apple Over iPod Hearing Loss


Recommended Posts

A man is taking Apple to court over potential hearing loss because of the Apple iPod

Apple Computer Inc. is being sued by a Louisiana man who claims the Apple iPod can cause hearing loss in people who use the popular MP3 player. The person who filed the suit, John Kiel Patterson, wants the case to be a class-action lawsuit that will force Apple to make upgrades to future models of the MP3 player.

According to part of the complaint, the iPods are "inherently defective in design and are not sufficiently adorned with adequate warnings regarding the likelihood of hearing loss." Each iPod already ships with a warning label declaring that high volume can result in a loss of hearing, but to many that just isn't good enough. In France, for example, all new iPods have limiting software inside the unit to govern the volume below 100 decibels -- the current models in the US can reach upwards of 125 decibels.

Link

"inherently defective in design and are not sufficiently adorned with adequate warnings regarding the likelihood of hearing loss." :rolleyes: What a freakin loser he wants them to make upgrades to the ipods to do what? Not be as loud? :wacko: :blink: Just turn it down you crack pot :p

WTF!!!!

i've never used an ipod but my mp3 player has a setting which you can enable which stops you from going above a certain volume to prevent these things but at the end of the day, ipod never made him listen to it that loud

Yet another example of how idiotic/greedy some people can be. Now, I'm not pointing fingers at any particular country... *cough*

Exactly what I was thinking.

Come on, if he listened to it loud enough for long enough to cause hearing loss, it's his own fault.

This just in: Man sues Staples because pen ran out of ink after 2 years of use: not enough warning, man said.

I more or less find it amusing. Those ear-bud style headphones are the worst kind of headphone for a person's hearing, yet the poser bunch among the iPod users wouldn't be caught dead listening to music any other way. They're the new bling, and they dismiss loss of hearing later in life the same way other posers dismiss health risks from smoking, drinking, junkfood, etc. They just keep telling themselves old age sucks anyway, then they go off doing everything they possibly can to make sure it will.

The issue with the american iPods is they cause INSTANT damage to your ears, say you accidentaly put it at high volume, or are listening to a very low volume song, then suddenly there starts a new loud song. You'll get instant damage to your ears it's that loud.

Gotta love how Apple is always singled out.

Not exclusivly in the MP3 world but Microsoft always gets more "singled out" than Apple so dont act like Apple is the victim. :rolleyes:

Anyways this guy's a dumbass...but there have been worse things in other countries just in case someone starts with the typical american debate...

So why hasn't he sued TV manufactures for having a volume that can go loud? Sony for making the "Walkman" all those years ago. Headphone manufacturers?

Hes a ###### just out for a quick buck.

I sincerely hope that if this ever gets to court, the judge throws it out and lands him with a massive legal bill plus a hefty fine that bankrupts him and puts him out in the gutter with the other low life trash, for wasting peoples time.

Yeah, that sounds good.

Edited by axious

Not exclusivly in the MP3 world but Microsoft always gets more "singled out" than Apple so dont act like Apple is the victim. :rolleyes:

I don't know how you brought MS into this, but wtg.

Apple have been sued for a lot of crazy things, they have been sued for not selling an education machine to the public, sued because the absolute bleeding edge software wont run on really old macs. sued because people scratch their nano's, and now sued because people listen to music too loudly (when your two feet away from a person, and hear their music from their earbud headphones (like my step-dad), sure sign of hearing damage later in life), and they have sued for a lot of other things as well.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Looks like the 7.1 is fake effects, can it at least do real 5.1? It says 'virtual 7.1' in all descriptions.
    • You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?
    • Yes, THIS is wordart, not the styling that can now be done. Wordart was all about those curvy words, that you could change the path of, like making words go around a circle. I don't think it can be done now, right?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!