Man Sues Apple Over iPod Hearing Loss


Recommended Posts

A man is taking Apple to court over potential hearing loss because of the Apple iPod

Apple Computer Inc. is being sued by a Louisiana man who claims the Apple iPod can cause hearing loss in people who use the popular MP3 player. The person who filed the suit, John Kiel Patterson, wants the case to be a class-action lawsuit that will force Apple to make upgrades to future models of the MP3 player.

According to part of the complaint, the iPods are "inherently defective in design and are not sufficiently adorned with adequate warnings regarding the likelihood of hearing loss." Each iPod already ships with a warning label declaring that high volume can result in a loss of hearing, but to many that just isn't good enough. In France, for example, all new iPods have limiting software inside the unit to govern the volume below 100 decibels -- the current models in the US can reach upwards of 125 decibels.

Link

"inherently defective in design and are not sufficiently adorned with adequate warnings regarding the likelihood of hearing loss." :rolleyes: What a freakin loser he wants them to make upgrades to the ipods to do what? Not be as loud? :wacko: :blink: Just turn it down you crack pot :p

WTF!!!!

i've never used an ipod but my mp3 player has a setting which you can enable which stops you from going above a certain volume to prevent these things but at the end of the day, ipod never made him listen to it that loud

Yet another example of how idiotic/greedy some people can be. Now, I'm not pointing fingers at any particular country... *cough*

Exactly what I was thinking.

Come on, if he listened to it loud enough for long enough to cause hearing loss, it's his own fault.

This just in: Man sues Staples because pen ran out of ink after 2 years of use: not enough warning, man said.

I more or less find it amusing. Those ear-bud style headphones are the worst kind of headphone for a person's hearing, yet the poser bunch among the iPod users wouldn't be caught dead listening to music any other way. They're the new bling, and they dismiss loss of hearing later in life the same way other posers dismiss health risks from smoking, drinking, junkfood, etc. They just keep telling themselves old age sucks anyway, then they go off doing everything they possibly can to make sure it will.

The issue with the american iPods is they cause INSTANT damage to your ears, say you accidentaly put it at high volume, or are listening to a very low volume song, then suddenly there starts a new loud song. You'll get instant damage to your ears it's that loud.

Gotta love how Apple is always singled out.

Not exclusivly in the MP3 world but Microsoft always gets more "singled out" than Apple so dont act like Apple is the victim. :rolleyes:

Anyways this guy's a dumbass...but there have been worse things in other countries just in case someone starts with the typical american debate...

So why hasn't he sued TV manufactures for having a volume that can go loud? Sony for making the "Walkman" all those years ago. Headphone manufacturers?

Hes a ###### just out for a quick buck.

I sincerely hope that if this ever gets to court, the judge throws it out and lands him with a massive legal bill plus a hefty fine that bankrupts him and puts him out in the gutter with the other low life trash, for wasting peoples time.

Yeah, that sounds good.

Edited by axious

Not exclusivly in the MP3 world but Microsoft always gets more "singled out" than Apple so dont act like Apple is the victim. :rolleyes:

I don't know how you brought MS into this, but wtg.

Apple have been sued for a lot of crazy things, they have been sued for not selling an education machine to the public, sued because the absolute bleeding edge software wont run on really old macs. sued because people scratch their nano's, and now sued because people listen to music too loudly (when your two feet away from a person, and hear their music from their earbud headphones (like my step-dad), sure sign of hearing damage later in life), and they have sued for a lot of other things as well.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
    • You could disable this "functionality/feature/whatever" with 2 registry keys, ages ago.
    • My Photos app is version 2026.11050.1001.0 and it remembers the window size and position. My Snipping Tool is version 11.2602.49.0 and it can capture the taskbar.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!