Opera 9 TP2 Released!


Recommended Posts

Ah no, my favorite feature from TP1 is gone. :(

In the address bar, a star appeared after the page was loaded, just clicked on that and it would create a bookmark. But not no more... :(

Another thing, how do I import my passwords from TP1 into TP2?

I think they moved it because people were complaining about the star. :|

I still prefer firefox with its extensions.

ok great, couldn't be happier for you. I prefer Opera and TP2 is great so far, I like the changes and new features, even the error pges are nicer now.

Though I don't use Opera very often, I like this preview release :)

Oh, but there's something to be said about this rather embarrasing typo.

The 0 just means your turning off visiting addresses or dont use "history" at all.

It's very nice, but you have GOT TO BE KIDDING!! Opera STILL has not fixed the problem with saving an image using right click while allowing pop-ups to come out like other browsers...wow... This problem is just too annoying for me. :( I really am sad; I would switch if this damn problem was fixed! Maybe the problem with videos is still there, too, though... :( I'm still checking it out...

*edit* LOL! Hey, whaddya know, the videos crashing Opera is STILL there! Go to MTV.com, and go to say, Radiohead, and try to play a video... Also, Opera still can't put an image on the desktop without terribly distorting it. eek! ...I should say this: Firefox can't play the videos either, BUT at least they don't crash the browser (and good old IE tab comes in handy for sites like MTV.com videos)!

Edited by komplexnous

It was very hesistant at loading sites, was very slow and froze, and I got a very fast cable connection and an AMD! I uninstalled it just as quick as I installed it! You still can't arrange the toolbars as well as Firefox, nice try but no thanks. I'll stick with SeaMonkey and Firefox, they work fine for me! (IMO) Sad to say but I even found IE 7 beta better then this!

Too bad Konqueror browser isn't written for Windows XP :(

No, the typo. It shows that they have done a great change to this version.

And the flickr photos don't show up, just a slot. :(

ok i didnt catch that typo, but flickr works for me...ahh the internet, what a pain in the...

How on earth does one delete Address bar history in Opera? ..apparently clearing history doesn't really clear history, this is a borderline security/privacy issue. I surely wasn't expecting to find typed in addresses in the address bar after clicking clear history.

As far as I can see the only way to get rid of the typed in addresses is to use the delete private data wizard, which seems mighty complicated for such ordinary functionality.

It?s nice, however I uninstalled it back in firefox. A couple of things:

- No way to make firefox tab close order even with buttons and mouse gestures not the same, trust me I tried.

- Renders sites kind of odd

- After uninstall messed up some icons, had to do some registry edits

- Closed source, no development

How do you get that menu? I know that there is menu like that which pops up when you hold the right mouse button and scroll, however I can't seem to get the preview images to show up.

Type this into the address bar, and tick the box:

opera:config#UserPrefs|UseThumbnailsinWindowCycle

I like how it's implemented. It looks like they rushed this feature into this preview as they forgot to stick a nice toolbar background onto it. :whistle:

- Closed source, no development

No development? Closed source doesn't always mean no development. You probably meant that development isn't as interactive with the community and as fast paced as open source - fair enough. There's pros and cons to both closed and open source.

- No way to make firefox tab close order even with buttons and mouse gestures not the same, trust me I tried.

Huh ? I have no idea what you're talking about, but Opera,unlike firefox switches tabs correctly. while firefox' tab managements sucks and

allways switches to the left one when you close or mininmize a tab, wich can only slightly be fixed with extensions like FLST. Opera switches all tabs in a last used history.

- Renders sites kind of odd

Opera renders sites correctly according to code. for any modern sites following html/xhtml standards they shoudl be correct. but lots of sites still checkbrowser names, and send garbage to Opera. or do like Nintento and just won't even let you view the site in opera...

- After uninstall messed up some icons, had to do some registry edits

Opera is contained in it's own folders and registry entries so I find this hard to believe, and I've never had any problems like this. and the only icons it would affect would be files associated with Opera that open in opera. wich would switch back when you set another browser to default.

- Closed source, no development

Not a bad thing. in my experiance closed source, at least from an actual company, means you get profssion well written and efficient code. Take FF for example. they have to fix security holes on a regular basis, thei memory management is beyond non existent. the code is also slow and "bloated"(I don't meanbloated by features here, just inefficent and to big for what it does).

Meanwhile Opera, uses less memory for far more features, it's opens faster, it renders faster, it switches tabs and history faster. and it has several built in features wich you with firefox would need to get separate programs. and all this in a far more installer and install.

Openm source is great and all that, but not even 0.01% of the users of popular open source programs ever even look at the code or know what open source is, and only a few ever do anythgin about it. And even so to have changed implemented in the release code, it has to be scrutinized and checked and tested and implemented by the develeoper team. whereas just suggestting the change and having the closed source dev team code the function , would most likely use less developer resources and be faster. and the develeopers would know the code far better and be able to implement it far more efficiently to the codebase.

Comparing Opera and FireFox, you see the clear advantage of havign closed source and how much better code you get from actually havign paid developers who work in a company they know they can trust and take care of them.

As for the whole extension thing.... well considering how much problems extension cause with eachother and with the existing memory holes, Opera themselves have said they won't be implementing extensions, bu Might in the future make something similar, but they have to make sure they can make something safe and efficient to contain them first. so they don't go crazy on your resources, and crash the browser like FF extensions like to do.

Just to start with we can mention the FF Flashmemory leak wich casues FF to use ALL your system memory (500 phsyical and 500 virtual is regular after afew hours use, but I've seenover 900 physical usage).

Not only have extensions never made Firefox unstable for me, I've never had Firefox crash on me at all. I agree that closed source has its advantages, but I think you underestimated the value of open source software slightly. I'd like to know where you got the 0.01% statistics. It sounds to me like you simply made that up to make your pro-Opera statements stronger.

I prefer Opera myself, but base your arguments on concrete, sourced facts.

It's nice, however I uninstalled it back in firefox. A couple of things:

- No way to make firefox tab close order even with buttons and mouse gestures not the same, trust me I tried.

- Renders sites kind of odd

- After uninstall messed up some icons, had to do some registry edits

- Closed source, no development

You can, almost, make coffee with Opera. Here's a solution to your "problem".

http://my.opera.com/community/forums/findpost.pl?id=1342675

Renders correctly acording to CSS compliance... Blame the authors of the pages if they can't code with standards.

Closed source = no development? You have got to be kidding. There is NO browser that is developed quicker than Opera right now. They are progressing really fast and come up with some nice innovative features as well... FF development is rather slow in my oppinion.

Just discovered how easy it is to change/add Autocomplete server name.... like CTRL+ENTER = http://www. .com in IE.

Preferences -> Advanced -> Shortcuts -> Keyboard Setup -> Edit -> Advanced -> Address dropdown widget ->

modify "enter ctrl", or/and add your own to for example make "enter shift" do -> http://www. .net

:)

Not only have extensions never made Firefox unstable for me, I've never had Firefox crash on me at all. I agree that closed source has its advantages, but I think you underestimated the value of open source software slightly. I'd like to know where you got the 0.01% statistics. It sounds to me like you simply made that up to make your pro-Opera statements stronger.

I prefer Opera myself, but base your arguments on concrete, sourced facts.

The most common problems extensions cause, outside of slowdwons and memory use, is that when you close FireFox, 9 of 10 times it won't actually close, ti appears to close but it'll remain in memory and as a running process. and you have to kill the process.

the percentage.. yeah I may have exxagarated. Do you know anyone who actually lokos at the code, or even more, actually modifies the code ?

I know a lot of people, and even on the IT university I went to, not a single of the programmer peopel, including me, ever looked or changed the firefox code. now how likely is it that regular users look at the source code, or even knows it's Open Source,or what that even means.

OpenSource is a buzzword, used mostly by the Semi knowhow peopel who liek to think they know a lot abotu IT. wich act like you, they say OpenSource is oh so great and you can modify the code like you wish and EVERYONE works on fixing the bugs. whenin reality they have never even looked at the code themselves, and there's a sad few people in reality actually doing code work, and then it's Disorganized, just ebcaus it's OpenSource.

Or do youhonestly think that even 1% of all those firefox users are Good programmers who ever enjoy working on the Firefox code ? If so you're sadly deluded.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know The ONLY thing I need to know is the price, which I know will be way higher than I (and most people) are willing to pay for a phone... so basically nothing here I need to know. PS: Nice job getting that Apple reference to a non-existent and unrevealed product as "competition" in there. Cheque is in the mail.
    • Well I really think the repasting helped if your higher clocks have returned, maybe the next thing to look at is if there is a problem with your case airflow? I guess this because your 3080 has returned to optimal state, but is still staying too warm, which might suggest it was thermal throttling before you repasted, of which the only logical conclusion could be outside factors.
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know by Hamid Ganji Galaxy Z Fold 7 - Image via Samsung The next generation of Samsung foldables is set to be unveiled next month at the second Unpacked event of the year. Samsung’s 2026 foldables are not expected to offer significant upgrades over their predecessors, with the Korean firm instead focusing on design refinements and conventional upgrades such as faster processors and better cameras. However, Samsung is reportedly planning to unveil an all-new passport-style foldable this year to rival Apple’s first foldable iPhone, which is expected to debut this September. Here’s a roundup of everything we know about Samsung’s upcoming foldable devices ahead of their official debut. When can we expect Samsung’s new foldables? The Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 series were unveiled in July, and Samsung is expected to maintain this timeframe in 2026. Based on previous reports from Korean sources, Samsung will hold its Unpacked event on July 22 in London, UK, to pull back the curtain on the Galaxy Z Fold 8 series. The devices are also expected to hit the shelves a few weeks after launch. However, Samsung has yet to announce an official date. A new naming scheme? One of the most interesting changes we might see this year is a new naming scheme for Samsung’s latest foldables. SamMobile reported that since Samsung is expected to unveil three foldables this year, it has adopted a new naming strategy to simplify product identification for customers. Accordingly, the standard Galaxy Z Fold 8 will reportedly be called the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and will serve as the direct successor to last year’s Galaxy Z Fold 7. The “Ultra” suffix suggests the phone could feature higher-end specifications, such as additional rear camera modules. Samsung’s new passport-style foldable is expected to carry the Galaxy Z Fold 8 name without any suffix. This model is reportedly equipped with two rear cameras. No major changes are expected for the Flip model. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 anticipated specs Rumors over the past few months suggest Samsung is preparing several upgrades for its upcoming foldables, although the devices may continue to rely on larger batteries and faster charging speeds rather than dramatic design changes. The primary focus this year is expected to be the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and its wide-screen design. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here are the anticipated specifications for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra based on previous leaks: 6.5-inch outer display and 8-inch inner display, 120Hz refresh rate, and 2,600 nits peak brightness Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, paired with 12GB or 16GB of RAM and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB of storage 4.1mm thickness when unfolded and a weight of 210g 200MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, 10MP or 12MP telephoto camera, 10MP cover camera, and 10MP selfie camera 5,000mAh battery with 45W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 As for the Galaxy Z Flip 8, the device is not expected to be a major departure from its predecessor, although it could become slightly slimmer. Expected specifications include: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600 processor 12GB of RAM with 256GB and 512GB storage options 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X inner dispaly and 4.1-inch Super AMOLED outer dispaly 50MP main camera, 12MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera 4,300mAh battery with 25W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 Samsung’s foldables are also expected to launch with Gemini Intelligence, Google’s AI suite for automating tasks in Android ecosystem. Moreover, given current memory and component costs, some Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 variants could see a price hike. Galaxy Z Fold 8 adopts a wide-screen design The centerpiece of the upcoming Unpacked event could be the Galaxy Z Fold 8, previously rumored as the Galaxy Z Fold Wide. This model adopts a passport-style form factor and is expected to compete directly with Apple’s iPhone Fold. Galaxy Z Fold 8 official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here’s what to expect: 7.6-inch primary OLED display and 5.4-inch cover display, 120Hz refresh rate, 2,600 nits peak brightness, and 4:3 aspect ratio Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, 12GB or 16GB of RAM, and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB storage options 4,800mAh battery with 45W wired charging 50MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera Android 17 and One UI 9 The three new foldable phones are unlikely to be the only devices unveiled at Samsung’s Unpacked event. The company is also expected to introduce the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 and the Galaxy Watch 9 series.
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      140
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!